The Trinity

The Trinity


  • Total voters
    121

Bright Raven

Well-known member
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Anything happen before the beginning?


Sent from my iPad using TOL
John 1:1-3 King James Version (KJV)

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

2 The same was in the beginning with God.

3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
 

keypurr

Well-known member
Before God created the universe (Genesis 1:1), the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit fellowshipped with one another within the Godhead for all of eternity past.

So God existed first, then his express image Son came to be before the "beginning".
That would make the express image firstborn then.


Sent from my iPad using TOL
 

keypurr

Well-known member
John 1:1-3 King James Version (KJV)

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

2 The same was in the beginning with God.

3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

Where did he word come from?



Sent from my iPad using TOL
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
So God existed first, then his express image Son came to be before the "beginning".

That's not what I said. That's not what I said at all.

I said that God (the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit) existed for eternity past, the three Persons fellowshipping with each other within the Godhead.

That would make the express image firstborn then.

Keypurr, You believe that the Son only indwelled flesh, that the body prior to the indwelling was someone else's body?
 

keypurr

Well-known member
That's not what I said. That's not what I said at all.

I said that God (the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit) existed for eternity past, the three Persons fellowshipping with each other within the Godhead.



Keypurr, You believe that the Son only indwelled flesh, that the body prior to the indwelling was someone else's body?

If the Son is the image of the Father, he must have come into existence after the Father. The Holy Spirit comes from the Father.

The point being, the Father always was, but the Son was not.

So what is the original beginning, the creation of the Son or the creation of the worlds? God created all through the Son.



Sent from my iPad using TOL
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
If the Son is the image of the Father, he must have come into existence after the Father.

Why must he have come into existence?

The Bible clearly states that He is God, and it clearly states that God has always existed. Why must the Son have been created or come into existence? What verse says that?

[/QUOTE]The Holy Spirit comes from the Father.[/QUOTE]

And? That doesn't mean he was created either.

The point being, the Father always was, but the Son was not.

You cannot find a verse that says that.

So what is the original beginning, the creation of the Son or the creation of the worlds?

God has no beginning, so for "the beginning" in Genesis 1:1, Moses starts with the first time God created something.

God created all through the Son.

God (the Trinity) created all through God (the Son). Only God created.

Keypurr, I'd like an answer to my question, so that I don't make a straw man argument against you.

You believe that the Son only indwelt flesh, and that the body he indwelt belonged to someone else, correct?
 

Bright Raven

Well-known member
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
If the Son is the image of the Father, he must have come into existence after the Father. The Holy Spirit comes from the Father.

The point being, the Father always was, but the Son was not.

So what is the original beginning, the creation of the Son or the creation of the worlds? God created all through the Son.



Sent from my iPad using TOL

If the Son is the image of the Father, he must have come into existence after the Father. The Holy Spirit comes from the Father.

Where do you get that from? Scripture references for proof that He had to come into existence after the Father?
 

Evil.Eye.<(I)>

BANNED
Banned
You tell me. Connect the dots between Genesis 1:1 and John 1:1-3

I will go a step further on this... Jesus calls Himself the "Light of the world". This is a direct binding to a profession that He is the first Life to "exist" within creation.

So many miss that God alone could be the FIRST to exist within creation. By Jesus binding HIMSELF to Gen. 1:3 ... He isn't saying that He was "Created at Creation" ... but that He is the GREAT I AM THAT I AM. Or... to get more to the point... that Jesus is the very SOURCE of ALL LIGHT that sustains LIFE ... Truth and all that is physical and (forgive the word)... Metaphysical... or (Beyond physical comprehension).

All that could be illuminated... only has ONE SOURCE of SPIRITUAL ILLUMINATION. To claim that Jesus is anything other than the I AM is to behold a "false" illumination.

Hence the deep connection between my screen name and Mt. 6:22

- EE

:thumb:
 

keypurr

Well-known member
Why must he have come into existence?

The Bible clearly states that He is God, and it clearly states that God has always existed. Why must the Son have been created or come into existence? What verse says that?
The Holy Spirit comes from the Father.[/QUOTE]

And? That doesn't mean he was created either.



You cannot find a verse that says that.



God has no beginning, so for "the beginning" in Genesis 1:1, Moses starts with the first time God created something.



God (the Trinity) created all through God (the Son). Only God created.

Keypurr, I'd like an answer to my question, so that I don't make a straw man argument against you.

You believe that the Son only indwelt flesh, and that the body he indwelt belonged to someone else, correct?[/QUOTE]

God had a spirit son before creation. God has a flesh son that he used to bring us light. The flesh son did not exist before the worlds were made. The spirit son was brought into existence by his creator.

When a single cell subdivides into two, the first cell created the second. Is God like that? The first cell is the original and the second a copy of? It would still be considered a cteation.

Just thinking of what might be.


Sent from my iPad using TOL
 
Top