One need only Google: "Jehovah's Witness cult" in order to see, they're a dyed in the wool cult.
You really ought to stay on your Cosmic Urantia thread. I'm certain you'd feel more comfortable in a "Twillight Zone" enviroment.
Kingdomrose, your heresy has you forgetting that "a rose by any other name, would smell as sweet" (is still a rose).
You are going by "what makes sense to me..."
Always an error - Gen. 3:6.
May you soon recover your self from the snare of the devil - who has taken you captive at his will - 2 Tim. 2:25-26.
There's not a non-Trin alive today that an historical Arian wouldn't slap senseless and charge with heresy. At least real Arians believed our Lord was something like Hercules or Superman; you just think He was a regular man. How silly!No. You know....I have gotten criticism for not thinking for myself, for believing stuff that somebody has told me, but that I haven't reasoned over. Now YOU are criticizing me for thinking for myself! I am d***** if I do, d***** if I don't. You don't want to discuss a viewpoint, you just want to brow-beat anyone who doesn't agree with you.
My heresy was not always heresy. Before the Council of Nicea (325 A.D.) the Arians had the popular beliefs. Constantine was able to bring the opposite views up to the top of the heap, and eventually anti-Arians won out. It all came down to POLITICS.
The last post on TOL from PsalmistGood.
Sacrifice is a Pagan interpretation of the tragic cross. In the original gospel preached to the Jews, the gospel they would be teaching today from Jerusalem if they hadn't rejected Jesus, salvation was by faith, not sacrifices. So the false claim that the cross was an atoning act is the problem for the Gentile world who invented it.
There was no sacrifice.
The word "cross" is not biblical. The suffering Messiah hung on a stake is biblical.Sacrifice is a Pagan interpretation of the tragic cross. In the original gospel preached to the Jews, the gospel they would be teaching today from Jerusalem if they hadn't rejected Jesus, salvation was by faith, not sacrifices. So the false claim that the cross was an atoning act is the problem for the Gentile world who invented it.
There was no sacrifice.
The word "cross" is not biblical. The suffering Messiah hung on a stake is biblical.
the only thing He carried was the cross part
The word "cross" is not biblical. The suffering Messiah hung on a stake is biblical.
The word "cross" is not biblical. The suffering Messiah hung on a stake is biblical.
Sacrifice is a Pagan interpretation of the tragic cross. In the original gospel preached to the Jews, the gospel they would be teaching today from Jerusalem if they hadn't rejected Jesus, salvation was by faith, not sacrifices. So the false claim that the cross was an atoning act is the problem for the Gentile world who invented it.
There was no sacrifice.
:freak:
Crucifixion was the standard of the time, and not on a 'stake'.
I also agree with you. There was no sacrifice in the Calvary. Jesus was not crucified as a sacrifice but as
a supposed act of insurrection. It happened that his disciples had planned to acclaim him king of the Jews at the entrance of Jerusalem and, being Jerusalem a Roman province in the First Century, Jesus was arrested as a rebel because of his disciples and the reason showed on the top of his cross as the verdict INRI that Jesus had been crucified as king of the Jews. (Luke 19:37-40) Now, I hope, you have his own disciples to blame for the crucifixion and not the Jewish authorities or the whole of the Jewish people.
I don't blame the Jews as a people, besides, among them are descendants of Jesus' own siblings. It was pig headed religious fanatics in Judaism whose bruised egos could not deal with the spiritual kingdom of Jesus. The Jews have paid a terrible price for rejecting the answer to Abrams faith.
It is very unlikely that Christ married and had children, but even if he did, that would not prevent the prophecies from being fulfilled.
If he did I wonder if the church would make them God too.
Sacrifice is a Pagan interpretation of the tragic cross. In the original gospel preached to the Jews, the gospel they would be teaching today from Jerusalem if they hadn't rejected Jesus, salvation was by faith, not sacrifices. So the false claim that the cross was an atoning act is the problem for the Gentile world who invented it.
There was no sacrifice.
You're a JW and don't have a clue. Jesus Christ was and is God the Son. Jesus Christ prayed to God the Father. Jesus Christ is God, ONE with God the Father and God the Holy Spirit.