CULT Threads ...
- Thread starter Eeset
- Start date
Thunder's Muse
Well-known member
hey!
can i flounce too?
can i flounce too?
I seriously doubt you know how. You need to attend the Tamboring school of etiquette.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
This thread should come with a bridge over it, as with several others...
lain:
lain:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
And those who dwell therein...
hey!
you're halfway to being relevant!
you're halfway to being relevant!
if only town would help you boost your post count :think:
So, to sum, Eeset decides she's going to join in her buddies surge and tries a coy bit of language reinvention:
I answer and she issues the "Aha!" she thinks she's set up:
But being Eeset begins to screw even that posture up by noting a single author:
Breathe points out the only particular Woodshed complaint (and it isn't aimed generally):
I note a number of specifically aimed posts by Eeset in her Diary thread alone (with no mention of any other).
So Eeset tries another tactic:
And during all this not one mention of her buddy and his locked threads.
No mention of a single other, comes to that. No old quotes about those complaints either. And you know why?
So it isn't my ego that's problematic here, but Eeset's. It gets her into all sorts of trouble, like this sad, late attempt to join in what, were she the recipient, she'd no doubt compare to a gang rape and have a lovely name or two to call those taking part in it.
I answer and she issues the "Aha!" she thinks she's set up:
But being Eeset begins to screw even that posture up by noting a single author:
Breathe points out the only particular Woodshed complaint (and it isn't aimed generally):
I note a number of specifically aimed posts by Eeset in her Diary thread alone (with no mention of any other).
So Eeset tries another tactic:
No one, of course, was arguing she had. Though why that's a virtue and why locking a thread longer (though not permanently) isn't is anyone's guess...likely including Eeset.
And during all this not one mention of her buddy and his locked threads.
No mention of a single other, comes to that. No old quotes about those complaints either. And you know why?
So it isn't my ego that's problematic here, but Eeset's. It gets her into all sorts of trouble, like this sad, late attempt to join in what, were she the recipient, she'd no doubt compare to a gang rape and have a lovely name or two to call those taking part in it.
Like that.
Over a poor trickle of a thing. That's our Eeset.
good boy!
have a biscuit
have a biscuit
and next time, try to post as if you weren't such a whiny little girl :chuckle:
Poor Skipper. Still parroting what you can't originate. I was right early on about you. That collar never left, only it wasn't the fellow, but your anger holding the leash.
no, that wasn't very good
try again
try again
Poor kid, can't even get that right. But nah, that's just another pointless distraction. So:
And she never did, unhappily ever after....let's get back to the actual purpose of this thread, which was taking a distorted cheap shot at me then pretending you weren't. It should be a simple matter for you to produce a number of complaints by you about other people locking threads. I mean, I produced a number of your directly aiming that at me from one thread.
I'll wait while you never do that.
oly: