Search results

The argument is against infallible foreknowledge, Idolater. Not "foreknowledge" in general. No one is saying God cannot, with great accuracy, predict the future, and far better than we can. What we're saying is that God does not infallibly know that that future that He predicts will come to...

Supra. Well that's clear as mud! Thank you. Man-made, as opposed to God-breathed, like Scripture was. The contents of the Bible were established as soon as scripture was finished being written. As for "who" decided, God did, and: What advantage then has the Jew, or what is the profit...

That's not the kind of knowledge that is meant by "God knows all things infallibly." Thanks for establishing my point. Whatever that's supposed to mean... Would you care to define it? Another term that has absolutely no meaning to me... So....... A man-made work that claims to detail what...

Yes. BEFORE He became a man, He was in heaven, fully God. He didn't have the name Jesus yet. He was known as the Word. You keep repeating this. But repeating yourself isn't magically going to make what you say come true. Yes, we are. The LOGOS BECAME FLESH. The LOGOS is the same person...

Now I'm almost certain you're @keypurr. He was in his 80s, and preached much the same message as you.

Now this is the kind of toilet humor I can get behind!

Thank you for suffering through it for us!

Yes He was. The LOGOS became flesh. That's literally what "incarnation" means! HE BECAME A MAN! Because it's false! Jesus IS the LOGOS! He was in heaven with His Father prior to the incarnation! Do you have a problem with object permanence or something?

I'm just embarrassed for her every time I hear her.

BBCode allows for posting code. Use the [ CODE ] and [ /CODE ] (without spaces) to post code. There's more, but you're better off seeing what you can do on the BBCode help page: https://theologyonline.com/help/bb-codes/

I wouldn't be able to sit through it even at 3x speed. And that's only ~20 minutes of video.

I'm not THAT old!

Fix your formatting, please.

Red X? Circle? (Check the image you uploaded to make sure it's the right one!)

Because Luke had a very analytical mind. He was a physician. He wanted to present the events of the first century in an orderly manner. Luke was his first book. Acts was his second book. Acts picks up where the other three gospels than his leave off. Again, without Acts, Paul's epistles would...

This is why claiming Christ knew what it was like to be a man, prior to the incarnation, is heretical: https://chatgpt.com/share/67a24bd2-6214-8001-bb5e-a8da174a8712

No, it doesn't. God has access to FAR more information (regarding the present, and thus the past as well) than any human ever could. Saying it doesn't make it so. We do. The answer is simple: He doesn't know less than us. He knows far more, and thus, is able to predict with great accuracy...

Christ was the Passover Lamb.... for Israel. Him being the Passover Lamb has very little to do with the Body of Christ.

And the LOGOS (John 1:1) indwelt that flesh (John 1:14) and was given the name Jesus on the 8th day after his birth according to the law of Moses (Luke 2:21). Jesus Christ is the LOGOS in the flesh! LITERALLY! It's the same person, Doug. It's not two different people! It's not two "halves"...