Search results

Should it not? Does not your theology drive everything in your life? IOW: Ideas have consequences. People act how they believe. Consider Steve Lawson. His theology drives his life. He believes that God foreordained everything that comes to pass, and there is a reason for everything He...

Thank you. So? Did you understand the point that was being made? Can you articulate it? I wasn't talking about the "conjecture" claim, which isn't an appeal to incredulity anyways. It wasn't even conjecture, either, not that there's anything wrong with conjecture! I was an "if - then"...

The haunted houses would be crazy! :P

Ugh, the lack of photos around the site (especially on Google Maps)... I would love to visit one day and take a few photospheres of the place for Maps. Okay, found some on Google earth. This is the view of Golgotha within the Garden Tomb area...

To give you an idea of just how close the Garden Tomb is to Golgotha, unfortunately I can't seem to find any good context shots on Google Maps, but I'm pretty sure you can see Golgotha from within the garden. And even if not, it's only a few minutes' walk between the two locations. Edit: it is...

Dunno. Just know that they had to prepare Jesus' body quickly, thus eliminating most burial sites (that aren't close enough to any places of punishment) and of the ones that remain, Golgotha and the GT are the only two sites that are close enough to each other and that match the narrative...

So what? ---- Instead of complaining about how unwatchable it is, you could, in good faith, watch it and address what was said. Appeal to incredulity is a logical fallacy. Are you talking about the video? Or Isaiah 41? You still aren't seeing it. Blinded by your own paradigm. If God...

Also, since it seems you didn't catch it: He is rebutting a fellow Open Theist. Not really an "opponent," per se. Most of your post seems to just be nit-picking, rather than considering what he actually said.

So many? So few? You a word. He recently publicly debated Dr. James White (and on the topic of omniscience, no less), and won. I'd say that gives him some clout. You cannot explain it without it being philosophical nonsense, because it is, inherently, such.

Distraction. Focus on what is said, not the one saying it. Take the step back. If Isaiah 40-48 is talking about God being so powerful, yet completely powerless to change His own people's hearts, and Isaiah 41:21-24 is within that section of scripture, then maybe, just maybe, it's not the...

As far as I'm aware, the Garden Tomb is the only tomb that matches the layout as fits the events in Scripture, where upon entering, is an antechamber, and to the right is where the bodies are laid, with a low wall in between upon which an angel could sit, the woman turned to the right, not the...

You're still not seeing it. Take a step back. Take a few, even,

@Lon Regarding Isaiah 40-48... (particularly 41:21-24, which is what you were trying to reference...) :

Isaiah 46 only has 13 verses.

FALSE. Jesus is the Logos. The Logos (Jesus) became flesh (human) and tabernacled (or "tented") among us. In other words, He put on a fleshy tabernacle called the human body and then lived in that body among humans. The body is just flesh. It's not another person.

So on the one hand, you say God knows the past present and future simultaneously. And on the other hand you say that nothing is really a necessary part of His existence. Is His simultaneous knowledge of the past, present, and future, not a necessary part of His existence?

So man is a necessary part of His existence?

So God from eternity past knew what it was like to be a man? Or did He gain that knowledge at the incarnation?