Search results

Harvard (or Stanford, for that matter) is not the bastion of Christianity you seem to think it is, Lon. Claiming "Harvard disagrees with you" doesn't address what Clete said, since they have adopted the very thing which Clete was talking about: Harvard falls into the category of those "who...

Then Jesus called a little child to Him, set him in the midst of them, and said, “Assuredly, I say to you, unless you are converted and become as little children, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven. Therefore whoever humbles himself as this little child is the greatest in the...

Fallacy: appeal to authority. Harvard can be (and on this, likely IS) wrong. Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I have become sounding brass or a clanging cymbal. And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge...

Do you happen to remember the argument? I'd like to hear it,

It's the same word G1722 in both 1 Corinthians 12:13 and in Matthew 3:11.

Ping @Lon

The Anglican church has been post-Christian for a loooooong time.

I had posted a couple of links to a few of your TOL posts on this topic in it, so it was probably auto-rejected or awaiting approval. I can't find it in my own comment history, unfortunately, so I'm guessing the former. https://youtube.com/@JudgeRightly

Curious to know your thoughts on this: My comment under the video: Open this link in a browser, as I'm pretty sure direct links to comments don't work in the mobile app. And I asked ChatGPT a few questions, seeing if what you and I believe ties into what Joel Korytko says...

First of all, if you're going to respond to someone, please use the "+QUOTE" or "Reply" button at the bottom of the post you wish to respond to. Second of all, why are you addressing this to me? None of this addresses anything I said, which wasn't much at all.

Link to the full playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLipp11LQP_zFPWbodNqsE6wnNdx66Q6nE

God IS sovereign. But he's not sovereign how a Calvinist defines the word, which isn't the actual definition anyways. They use the same word, but give it a different meaning.

INDEED! AMEN! Sure. No, Lon, it simply does not. Infinite ( adj. ): 1. limitless or endless in space, extent, or size; impossible to measure or calculate. - very great in amount or degree - [mathematics] greater than any assignable quantity or countable number. - [mathematics] (of a...

Now you're starting to get it.... I think... Again, I believe 2 Timothy 3:16-17. The entire Bible is profitable for men of God. It doesn't mean that there isn't truth relevant to both Jews and the members of the Body of Christ, let alone deeper truth. It means that some things were said in...

How in the world did you arrive at that conclusion!? Of course I don't believe that, nor is it what I said! I believe 2 Timothy 3:16-17. And again, you fail to rightly divide the word of truth.

It doesn't. You fail to rightly divide. It's not telling US (members of the Body of Christ) "faith without works is dead." You're reading someone else's mail, thinking it's addressed to you. It's telling a future generation of Israel "faith without works is dead." Not the Body of Christ...

No, He does not. False. Wrong. "No works" means no works. Period. "By grace through faith." If someone is on their death-bed, and places his trust in Christ, and then dies immediately after, your position would mean he went to hell because He had no works after He was justified...

https://chatgpt.com/share/67905e69-a1a0-8001-9b32-R23D32251847 There is one verse, ONE that says God's UNDERSTANDING is infinite. But that does not necessitate that God Himself is infinite. I stand by what I said above. The Bible does not call God "infinite."

@ok doser help is on the way!

You just did.