Search results

Acts a transition book. Without it, without the transition from "Gospel" to "Pauline Epistle," from New Covenant to Dispensation of Grace, Paul's writings would seem to not have any place in the Bible. In other words, the only reason Paul's writings fit in the Bible is because of the book of...

Even if that were true, and it's not, it doesn't change the fact that there are other paradigms of belief that do not require either Calvinism's doctrines of election or for universalism to be true. In other words, what you're presenting is a false dichotomy. What the Bible teaches is that...

| V

You don't seem to have understood what I said. An argument from repitition is where you repeatedly say something as though it will convince the one you are speaking to that it is true. In other words, just because you say something repeatedly, doesn't magically make it true. You can claim...

Argument from repetition is a logical fallacy for a reason.

"Why do when?" Because now. "You can don't" I can?

Do you need me or @Sherman to reset your password on your original account?

Since being introduced to Bob's ministry in 2015, I came to believe that anyone who dies before reaching the age of accountability, whatever age that is, they would be allowed to live in heaven until they reached that age, free from the flesh and demonic influence. I'd argue that the ratio of...

Not even close! I was simply wondering why Crede was responding to a post directed at Bladerunner. And then Bladerunner, seeing my mention of him, seems to think I was asking him something. Just pay attention people! It's not hard! I promise!

@Bladerunner @Crede please go read who I am responding to, and try not to respond to someone's posts to someone else as though they were addressed to you.

Are you @Bladerunner?

You clearly did not listen to what was played in the video. You did not listen to the words Dr. White himself said, that were recorded, and then played back for all to hear. Here is what he originally said, verbatim (yes, I went and looked for the exact quote): Dr. White: "I think God's...

Because you say so? Pointing to a future Remnant is not evidence of, nor does it prove that, a Remnant exists today. The Remnant are the branches that were not cut off (cf Romans 11). The program which allows for a Remnant to exist at all to begin with, is currently on hold, was put on hold...

Indeed. And? Where have I or anyone else ever said "Don't read James, Peter, Hebrews, Jude" or "don't pay any heed to the Gospels"?! All we have ever said is that you shouldn't ignore what is written within the context of what is written. For example: But He answered and said, “I was not...

It always amazes me that people who claim to put equal relevance on all the apostles completely ignore passages like Romans 1 and Acts 25, which promote the death penalty just as much as Jesus did.

No, they are not the Remnant. The Remnant died out after Paul's dispensation was given. Maybe what they taught has continued, but it's not a matter of what one teaches, it's a matter of what God did. If they are saved, it is in spite of their practices, not because of them.

You clearly do not. My position is what the Bible says. You find my position false? Which scripture, specifically? Because my position discounts NO Scripture. The "gospel of salvation" that you get by mashing two different dispensations together, which either makes Paul a liar, or makes...

No, I'm saying I cannot convince you of my position if you are not willing to even understand it. It's a refusal on your part.