Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Hence: 1.) The information that the Christian uses is false, i.e. a bold faced lie.

Well, you do, not Christians in general. Perhaps you should stop doing it?

I stated this in the OP of Part 1:

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior

Numerous links will be attached throughout the thread, backing what has been written by various sources. If there is factual error, then I encourage anyone to refute it with their source.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3135435&postcount=1

We've been over the homosexuality of Adolf Hitler and his SS henchmen numerous times Art. I've shown that the person that organized the US Holocaust Museum is a homosexual activist, therefore he didn't want to tie those who engage in homosexual behavior and the agenda itself to Hitler (although I've shown how the Homosexual Movement uses gestapo tactics fresh out of the SS handbook to intimidate and silence any opposition).

I've also acknowledged that the drag queens, dykes and fairies that currently run both the American Psychological Association and the American Psychiatric Association state that the findings of Dr. Paul Cameron are fraudulent. If you can refute anything that Cameron stated in his articles or reports (early death, high rate of disease and violence amongst homosexuals) then I would appreciate the information.

 

[Rusha]

Assuming that you believe that Churches and other institutions (such as youth mentor groups) should be neutral when it comes to teaching morals to children and that the parents of children should be the only ones teaching them right from wrong, .

I don't ... which is why you shouldn't *assume* things.

I can only assume that you see nothing wrong with parents teaching their children that homosexuality is perfectly normal?.

Again, you assume. Parents should teach children to love themselves and be kind to one another. You do understand that kids are capable of going to Sunday School and reading the Bible all on their own, right?

BTW, I missed your comment about B. Hussein Obama and the great things he's done for our country.

Quit derailing this thread. IF you wish to discuss Obama or any other President or candidates, start a new thread.

This thread is about how icky all of those homosexuals are ...

Focus.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
What can I say Al other than Porno Pete and I love the 'imaginary sky god' and His Word.

You two sure seem to have so much in common.
People might say you're love?

Careful Al, you'll make GFR7, who is literally infatuated with the "soft spoken" Peter LaBarbera, jealous.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Assuming that you believe that Churches and other institutions (such as youth mentor groups) should be neutral when it comes to teaching morals to children and that the parents of children should be the only ones teaching them right from wrong, .

I don't ... which is why you shouldn't *assume* things.

But but but Sandy, you just said in an above post that "Teaching morality is the parents job."


Quote:
I can only assume that you see nothing wrong with parents teaching their children that homosexuality is perfectly normal?.

Again, you assume. Parents should teach children to love themselves and be kind to one another. You do understand that kids are capable of going to Sunday School and reading the Bible all on their own, right?

Would you agree with Art Brain that it's ok to tell children that homosexuality is normal as long as the people involved love one another?


Quote:
BTW, I missed your comment about B. Hussein Obama and the great things he's done for our country.

]Quit derailing this thread. IF you wish to discuss Obama or any other President or candidates, start a new thread.

This thread is about how icky all of those homosexuals are ...

Focus.

Oh but Sandy, "The First Gay President" (per the cover of Newsweek magazine) plays a huge part in this thread.

On that note, have a nice day Sandy.

 

[GFR7]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
What can I say Al other than Porno Pete and I love the 'imaginary sky god' and His Word.



Careful Al, you'll make GFR7, who is literally infatuated with the "soft spoken" Peter LaBarbera, jealous.

No need to be jealous; he likes me, and he doesn't like you.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior

Careful Al, you'll make GFR7, who is literally infatuated with the "soft spoken" Peter LaBarbera, jealous.

No need to be jealous; he likes me, and he doesn't like you.

 

[Rusha]

But but but Sandy, you just said in an above post that "Teaching morality is the parents job."

And yet you wish to argue with me over it. :think: So you don't believe it's up to the parents to teach morality. Noted.

I can only assume that you see nothing wrong with parents teaching their children that homosexuality is perfectly normal?.

At what age would this supposed conversation take place? I am not seeing the need to initiate a discussion that includes heterosexuality VS. homosexuality. The discussion of the birds and the bees should include the risks of promiscuous and unprotected sex. I guess you don't believe that happens with heterosexuals. :think:

Would you agree with Art Brain that it's ok to tell children that homosexuality is normal as long as the people involved love one another?

Being that I know him much better than you ever will, he would not butt into the lives of children who are not his own. Unlike yourself, he isn't full of hatred or the need to spread his negativity to others.

Oh but Sandy, our "first gay President" (per the cover of Newsweek magazine) plays a huge part in this thread.

On that note, have a nice day Sandy.

That's nice ... and you too.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior

I can only assume that you see nothing wrong with parents teaching their children that homosexuality is perfectly normal?.

At what age would this supposed conversation take place? I am not seeing the need to initiate a discussion that includes heterosexuality VS. homosexuality. The discussion of the birds and the bees should include the risks of promiscuous and unprotected sex. I guess you don't believe that happens with heterosexuals.

As shown throughout this 3 part thread the Homosexual Movement indoctrinates children of various ages (some as young a preschoolers) that having "two mommies" is perfectly normal.

I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt here Sandy and say that you obviously haven't been following this 3 part thread and tell you to review the table of contents and become informed.

After doing that, if you come back and still defend the decriminalization of homosexuality....well, I stated what those kind of people are in Part 1.

 

[GFR7]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior

Careful Al, you'll make GFR7, who is literally infatuated with the "soft spoken" Peter LaBarbera, jealous.

Don't be ridiculous, you old fool.
I have no cause and no reason to stalk Mr. LaBarbera.
Stop spreading disinformation on a public forum.
(Just because he likes me and doesn't like you,
don't let your jealousy project onto me. )

Nice try, but we need a Psycho Alert for you:

PSYCHO ALERT: MR. CULTURE WARRIOR, KENTUCKY, USA

 

[GFR7]

And you don't even care about Peter LaBarbara's trial in Canada :
I'll bet you didn't even text him
support and I am keeping on top of all
the details while you are not:

Canadian free speech trial of Peter LaBarbera and
Bill Whatcott is today at 9:00 AM at the
Regina Provincial Courthouse,
1815 Smith Street, Regina.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Nice try, but we need a Psycho Alert for you:

PSYCHO ALERT: MR. CULTURE WARRIOR, KENTUCKY, USA

I've been meaning to ask you muffin:

While I haven't gone into detail, I have mentioned that many proud and unrepentant homosexuals have their own reasons for being against 'gay marriage'.

You've started dozens of threads about 'gay marriage', I figure you know that it will be only a matter of time before your LGBT movement redefines that institution like it has others and you want to show people that you're 'reasonable' by standing up against 'gay marriage'.

For the record: What is your stance on same sex 'marriage' and more importantly why?

 

[GFR7]

I've been meaning to ask you muffin:

While I haven't gone into detail, I have mentioned that many proud and unrepentant homosexuals have their own reasons for being against 'gay marriage'.

You've started dozens of threads about 'gay marriage', I figure you know that it will be only a matter of time before your LGBT movement redefines that institution like it has others and you want to show people that you're 'reasonable' by standing up against 'gay marriage'.

For the record: What is your stance on same sex 'marriage' and more importantly why?

I'm against it because I believe it will further the moral unraveling for future generations.

It is also unnecessary and has far more to do with demanding acceptance than with "equality".

But then, you know as well as I that "proud and unrepentant homosexual" has nothing to do with me, and everything to do with your projections, delusions, and hallucinations.

 

[GFR7]

Happy Halloween to my dear friend, a Culture Warrior~!

 

[GFR7]

:up:May a Culture Warrior continue with his important work for many years to come~!! :up:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote: Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior

You've started dozens of threads about 'gay marriage', I figure you know that it will be only a matter of time before your LGBT movement redefines that institution like it has others and you want to show people that you're 'reasonable' by standing up against 'gay marriage'.

For the record: What is your stance on same sex 'marriage' and more importantly why?

I'm against it because I believe it will further the moral unraveling for future generations.

"Moral unraveling"? You're surely not talking about the morals of a once Judeo-Christianized society, hence the morals that come from The Holy Bible are you cupcake?

It is also unnecessary and has far more to do with demanding acceptance than with "equality".

It wasn't "necessary" that proud and unrepentant homosexuals be allowed into the military, be allowed into youth mentor groups, etc. etc., why is your pet peeve the institution of marriage sugarbear?

 

[GFR7]

Quote: Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior

You've started dozens of threads about 'gay marriage', I figure you know that it will be only a matter of time before your LGBT movement redefines that institution like it has others and you want to show people that you're 'reasonable' by standing up against 'gay marriage'.

For the record: What is your stance on same sex 'marriage' and more importantly why?



"Moral unraveling"? You're surely not talking about the morals of a once Judeo-Christianized society, hence the morals that come from The Holy Bible are you cupcake?



It wasn't "necessary" that proud and unrepentant homosexuals be allowed into the military, be allowed into youth mentor groups, etc. etc., why is your pet peeve the institution of marriage sugarbear?

Yep, that's the moral unraveling I meant.
The other stuff did bother me, but it rode in on the marriage wave, and will ride out on it. :AMR1:
Yours ever,
Cupcake

 

[GFR7]

PRAY FOR OUR PETER, A CULTURE WARRIOR~!!! :wave2:

Canada Update: Judge Reserves Decision on LaBarbera, Whatcott ‘Mischief’ Charge until December 22
Pro-family advocates reject plea bargain to lesser “trespass” charge in free speech case

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Yep, that's the moral unraveling I meant.
The other stuff did bother me, but it rode in on the marriage wave, and will ride out on it. :AMR1:

Please be more specific as to why this particular institution should outlaw two people of the same gender who love one another from participating in it.

You've started numerous threads on the subject and I would suspect went into great detail in your posts in those threads, show the followers of this thread the 'reasoning' you used in other threads that dealt with this topic.

 

[GFR7]

Please be more specific as to why this particular institution should outlaw two people of the same gender who love one another from participating in it.

You've started numerous threads on the subject and I would suspect went into great detail in your posts in those threads, show the followers of this thread the 'reasoning' you used in other threads that dealt with this topic.

I posted many scholarly articles making solid and logical judgments as to the reasons why same sex marriage is harmful to society.

Among them:

• the furthered acceptance of homosexuality in school teachings, in Universities, in media and entertainment, and in politics;
• the furthering of a disconnect between marriage and procreation; the embracing of third party reproductive technology;
• the redefinition of an institution which has been proven to be the cornerstone of family and society,
• the continued decay of standards begun by feminism, the sexual revolution, birth control, and abortion
• furthering of gender-blending, bisexuality, and confusion; furthering of sexual alternative lifestyles and experimentation now viewed as "normal, acceptable, and desirable"
• the alienation of religious traditions and liberty
• continued secularization of society

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Please be more specific as to why this particular institution should outlaw two people of the same gender who love one another from participating in it.

You've started numerous threads on the subject and I would suspect went into great detail in your posts in those threads, show the followers of this thread the 'reasoning' you used in other threads that dealt with this topic.

I posted many scholarly articles making solid and logical judgments as to the reasons why same sex marriage is harmful to society.

And you've made many many posts in this thread against the recriminalization of a morally depraved behavior that has been devastating to those who engage in that behavior and to society in general.

Again (this time in your own words), tell the followers of this thread why two people of the same gender (or more) who love one another shouldn't be able to partake in the institution of marriage.