^ This
Town Quixote's
- Thread starter Town Heretic
- Start date
^ This
You cannot settle that question.
I love to drink beer from a lovely crystal stein!
Cheers!
it took me about ten seconds :idunno:
pot, meet kettle :chuckle:
can you link to where i've accused him of not being one?
that's why i mock him
:mock: town
That is a conclusion to which only a pair of losers would subscribe.
thank you for contributing the opinion of a retard :idunno:
oops.
One must communicate at a level which the troglodytes may understand....or not!
While I made a decision not to aid and abet stalkers, in the interest of honest disclosure and to correct any potential for mistaken impression, the quote in full was:
The point being that in a secular compact there's no real and objective argument for the discrimination. It was and remains a purely religious objection. And while I share the moral objection I can't sustain it outside of that and for that reason (and because I don't want anyone else's purely religious sentiment controlling me and mine) I object as a matter of conscience and note its inevitability as a matter of law.
The latest Gazette found here.
Which is probably why I defended gay marriage as a matter of law and the building of the Islamic mosque near ground zero.lain:
The point being that in a secular compact there's no real and objective argument for the discrimination. It was and remains a purely religious objection. And while I share the moral objection I can't sustain it outside of that and for that reason (and because I don't want anyone else's purely religious sentiment controlling me and mine) I object as a matter of conscience and note its inevitability as a matter of law.
Don't worry it him, bybee. It's not worth your time.
The latest Gazette found here.
i suppose you're trying your best, bless your silly little heart :thumb:
town struggles to defend his actions, defending law that is contrary to God's will:
like i said, way to go, spitting in God's face
like i said, way to go, spitting in God's face
Breathe
New member
Not that it is relevant in this thread, but here is my opinion:
From a religious perspective, I cannot support homosexuality. However, I also cannot support passing laws based solely on the beliefs of any particular religion, for this reason: if we start to do so, using our own Christianity, we open the door for laws based on other religions, such as Sharia law - something very few of us would favor. So I cannot sanction opening that door at all.
That's essentially where I've come down and I've never been less than clear about that.
And you're right, the Gazette isn't a place for the argument. I expect it will come up again in another thread one of these days and there will likely be a link to that thread here when it happens.
Appreciate the effort though.
Breathe
New member
Sorry for the minor derailment. Most people just never think about what would happen if we start to pass religion based laws - they just want their particular faith to be represented in the legal system, and don't realize that once you have let that particular cat out of the bag, you cannot get it back in.
:think: We've dodged it in the NFL thread so far. But it's likely only a matter of time.
Latest Jack story (as told to another pal of mine):
Last night Jack had to have a Dora the Explorer balloon when we ran over to the Dollar store for milk. The minute we were out of the store he launched it.
He was starting to get upset about it, so I turned it into a game. I said, "Hey, that's GREAT Jack! Now she can explore the sky and the stars and roll over the tree tops at night and look down on all the homes in our town!"
He liked that so for the rest of the night I'd sprinkle in, "I wonder where Dora is now." And Jack would guess.
Thursday's Gazette here.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
As opposed to a petty dweeb who spends his time insulting total strangers on the internet? Not to mention making fun of people with disabilities? Also an advocate for cruelty to animals?
Not to mention beating his wife...
