Did you stop posting? :think:
Did they start a thread?
Not if it's your universe...about as unusual as a homosexual saying they're the center of aCW's.
You know who laughs uproariously at their own shtick? The only person who's likely to.
It's your post, so that seems a bit redundant.
Like a child longs for summer, or a grammarian an eraser...assuming you wrote this in pencil, of course.
A bit like taking your clothes off in public and declaring the interest of passers by...it's a popular thread. If you post in it people will see it. Enjoy the novelty.
Did you come up with that on the spot or have you been waiting to use it?
I'd translate that, but I'm not going to. :nono:
A bit like taking your clothes off in public and declaring the interest of passers by...it's a popular thread. If you post in it people will see it. Enjoy the novelty.
lain:
I'd compensate you, but all the money from this thing goes to the Women's Defense Fund. And they thank you for your generous contributions...well, contributions anyway.I'm quoted so often in it- I demand royalties
I'd settle for you seeing me here first.
Finally, something you are less objective about than football.
Why would you build a wall in Africa?
That's one way to get seniority at the university, I suppose. Add tree-huggers and you'll be dean by the end of the week.
I think that's more ruining fashion...or 40 times.Yeah!....And pull up your pants! ....Or does that go along with ruining America?
Yeah. It's "Proof please" until you give it and then it's the ol "Not about me".
That's some gag. :think:
Who would ever have thought that word would be associated with SD?
Well...then it would be catchy, wouldn't it.As for SD's site I would posit there's a letter missing from it...
I'd ask for your position, but I don't want to be misconstrued.
Most murders in this country aren't committed by Muslims.
Most Muslims aren't from Africa.
Does your bronze subscription make you uneasy with yourself?
What's the hat situation like? Or, was he standing in a doorway denying you entry while darting his eyes repeatedly to one side or the other when he made the statement?I now know a person in real life who's voting for Trump. Who told me I "have to vote for Trump."...He also told me (vehemently) that if Hillary wins, that her first plan of action is to get us into a war with Russia, because that's what the new world order people have planned.
I mean, where do you go with that? I'm used to seeing that kind of thing online - hearing it in person is a little more surreal.
If so, I may have a clarifying insight. :think: Which, when you think about it, is about time.
It's odd. You'd think someone saying one thing over and over would get better at saying it, eventually.Originally Posted by Arthur Brain
Whereas you effectively say very little and when read even less...
There's only one of me...:think:...how many you got in there?Originally Posted by Crucible
Speak for yourselves.
Well, no. But it was a lovely impression of...your idea of someone. Can you do Nixon?
:think: A police officer?
Which subject, rape or your women are bad harangue? I wonder if your answering machine message goes: "You've reached the [...] residence. I'm not home right now, but if you'll leave your name, number and a brief message at the beep I'll get back to you with an extensive diatribe on the evils of women that'll curl your hair. Thanks for calling. Beep."
And I'm not entirely certain that beep was mechanical...or that you own an answering machine.
I swear it was that way when I found it.Originally Posted by patrick jane
Town Heretic has ruined America
I don't believe in magic. Though I do believe in magicians. . . I even enjoy their performances. But you need a new trick, that isn't a rabbit or a hat you're pulling it out of....you all are in denial about the problem. Or, under a spell- a very feminine spell
I'm mostly amazed you can spell it.
The most unfortunate thing associated with that war is how many people failed to understand its lessons or profit from the wisdom produced by the suffering and struggle of so many. In case you missed the point of that I mean people like you...for all your education your understanding and rhetoric are indistinguishable on the point from some similarly ignorant cracker pulling potatoes in a field.
Nothing other than a lack of means and ability prevents any man from doing something stupid...and you're making a fine case that even that isn't necessarily a bar.1. I'm sorry, I fail to see how this prevents us from shipping them back there...
Most murders in this country aren't committed by Muslims.
Most Muslims aren't from Africa.
Does your bronze subscription make you uneasy with yourself?
What's the hat situation like? Or, was he standing in a doorway denying you entry while darting his eyes repeatedly to one side or the other when he made the statement?I now know a person in real life who's voting for Trump. Who told me I "have to vote for Trump."...He also told me (vehemently) that if Hillary wins, that her first plan of action is to get us into a war with Russia, because that's what the new world order people have planned.
I mean, where do you go with that? I'm used to seeing that kind of thing online - hearing it in person is a little more surreal.
If so, I may have a clarifying insight. :think: Which, when you think about it, is about time.
It's odd. You'd think someone saying one thing over and over would get better at saying it, eventually.Originally Posted by Arthur Brain
Whereas you effectively say very little and when read even less...
There's only one of me...:think:...how many you got in there?Originally Posted by Crucible
Speak for yourselves.
Well, no. But it was a lovely impression of...your idea of someone. Can you do Nixon?
:think: A police officer?
Which subject, rape or your women are bad harangue? I wonder if your answering machine message goes: "You've reached the [...] residence. I'm not home right now, but if you'll leave your name, number and a brief message at the beep I'll get back to you with an extensive diatribe on the evils of women that'll curl your hair. Thanks for calling. Beep."
And I'm not entirely certain that beep was mechanical...or that you own an answering machine.
I swear it was that way when I found it.Originally Posted by patrick jane
Town Heretic has ruined America
I don't believe in magic. Though I do believe in magicians. . . I even enjoy their performances. But you need a new trick, that isn't a rabbit or a hat you're pulling it out of....you all are in denial about the problem. Or, under a spell- a very feminine spell
I'm mostly amazed you can spell it.
The most unfortunate thing associated with that war is how many people failed to understand its lessons or profit from the wisdom produced by the suffering and struggle of so many. In case you missed the point of that I mean people like you...for all your education your understanding and rhetoric are indistinguishable on the point from some similarly ignorant cracker pulling potatoes in a field.
Nothing other than a lack of means and ability prevents any man from doing something stupid...and you're making a fine case that even that isn't necessarily a bar.1. I'm sorry, I fail to see how this prevents us from shipping them back there...
Rather, Islam exists outside of the myopic focus you're attempting to use to define it.
A lot of people have been killed by radical Islam. Most of the victims have been neither white nor Christian.
Somewhere, Hillary smiled in her sleep.
It's mostly a trial lawyer thing. Tax, contract, corporate...they're about as wry as Wonder Bread.Touche! Ever the lawyerly wit.
Normally you'd have to attend Princeton Law for that demonstrable acumen...or be elected to Congress.Originally Posted by TomO
Ahhh....The old "He who smelt it; dealt it." criminology theory. :think:
I'd tip my hat to you if I could only pry it from my head.
Do you mean that theoretically or have you seen one? :think:Originally Posted by ClimateSanity
The last time he had a real point he was wearing it.
You can't teach what you don't know....let's see what you really want to talk about.
That's what it seemed like to me, too.
No idea what you're talking about, but good to see you're a subscriber. :thumb:Massive storm hits and takes out power for two days, tornado up the road sabotages the cable for three days...
Plenty of time to sink the teeth in, right
And the absence of sobriety checkpoints near polling places.
You get rid of any number of people and you reduce the number of problems.
According to the FBI, in 2015 out of every 100 white victims of violent crime, 13 would be at the hands of blacks, 56 at the hands of other whites. If you were black, 10 would be attributable from whites and 62 from blacks. That's not exactly a huge difference, is it.
A bit like me saying something direct about your ancestry and then telling you it's a purely genetic speculation and you shouldn't be offended.
On his status as a minority member:
Sure. You're a minority member. It just never occurred to you that most others weren't. That's why it was possible to elect a black president. That literally couldn't have happened a couple of generations ago.
It isn't my definition. Buy a dictionary.
Supra by way of illustration. In 1968, according to GALLUP, less than 20% of the U.S. population approved of interracial couples. By 2013 that figure was 87% and if you looked at the younger people, cutting off at 29, it was 97%. Huge generational sea change in this country since the Civil Rights Movement.
Get a time machine or just stand around griping about it until you die, dinosaur. It's not going to happen.
The dinosaur part, I mean.
"Jesus loves the little children, all the children of the world. Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in his sight. Jesus loves the little children of the world." My song beats your song all to heck and back.
Everyone is judgmental and most of us get a little personal now and then...so it's common among people. That's why you're comfortable inferring I'm judgmental and how you said what you did to anna.
Agreed. But it's also hard to miss. I'm betting anna didn't. Or, tell me what's objective and impersonal about telling her that she must love Muslims, etc.
I did say I wasn't calling you dishonest. Twice. I don't tend to apologize for not doing what someone thought I was doing when I wasn't doing it, unless I agree with the judgment, think it's reasonable to mistake me on the point. I think you took an inference that you were bias blinkered or playing coy in the worst possible way and I don't think that's reasonable. But I am sorry you saw it like that.
lain:
Suffragettes wanted the right the Constitution promised citizens, the right to vote, to be heard through the process that was premised in equality before the law. As with minorities, we failed the principle and, as with minorities, it had to be fought for and obtained through struggle.
Rather, that's precisely what it is, a social movement. As Merriam Webster would have the usage:
b: a series of organized activities working toward an objective; also: an organized effort to promote or attain an end <the civil rights movement> Merriam Webster
A question that comes to mind each time I read you.
Rape is sex without consent.
No, it would be rape in every sense.
You still don't understand the definition of assault either. You mean battery, which would also not be a necessary part of what constitutes a rape, though many rapes do involve both assault and battery.
So in his world refusing to have sex is the same as insisting on sex against someone's will.
It's like he's writing in English until you actually put it together in your head and then you have to think, "No, that can't be it...really?"
This is what comes from basing a rule on second-hand anecdotal experience.
An assault is putting someone in reasonable fear of a battery. Sex shouldn't be that, unless you're really, really bad at it.
Unlike you and the frequently banned one, lawyers don't eschew continuing education...or education in general. Sounds like a good idea. It's easy to become jaded when you're in the trenches over time. Prosecutors are human, just like judges.
Good for them. :thumb:
Memo to self: lobby to become a moderator.
Well, except for...
Tomorrow? The long bright weekend of the soul.
I believe in the value of science. I know the scientific method works. The latter does not inherently promote the former. In fact, were you a survivor of Hiroshima you might not find the former palatable at all.
But it isn't just in any sense. Or, you can accept, if you like, that death is inevitable, but you will not convince me (or, I think, yourself) that life isn't preferable within your context. And if life is preferable then the alternative is lesser.
There isn't a lack of evidence, only a want of irrefutable proof, outside the experience of God, which is inherently subjective. I don't, however, find skepticism reasonable if it leads to an inferior choice in life context, one at odds with human imperatives and does so without proof, only faith resting on the lack of experience of a thing, which if experienced could never be used to satisfy the standard no one can arrive at.
Life.
Where I'd say the atheist serves his ego (doing what he wills to serve what he values) and the faithful serve the judge of their egos (doing what He wills to serve what He values).
Maybe. It's hard to say how most feel about it without...well, you know.
Most married couples have bank accounts. If by "private" you mean individual, that's not uncommon either, especially among the affluent.
No, it's the part where I note that doesn't actually change anything.
Seriously, stop trying to see how much you can't manage to make work in a sentence.and I point out the resounding irony of the subject of what causes rape according to you
That takes a felony conviction and that requires actual evidence. You're not being honest with the facts.
Oh, I wouldn't say just. I don't think anyone would use that in relation to your arguments. :nono:So much for equal measure- instead of them being misandrists, I'm just a misogynist
Spoken like someone who literally doesn't know what he's talking about but insists on talking about it anyway.
Well, with that chip on your shoulder and that degree of experience...
Now coup de disgrace yourself:
There's no excuse, no personal bias that should make anyone with half a soul make that statement.
Thanks for putting you in perspective for everyone. :thumb:
Yeah, and that's why I don't care if women like you get raped. Something you never understood from the start- you all don't mind men getting treated horribly, so why should I care so much about you
Let it sink in- you shouldn't be expecting men to cater to you while you run over them :wave2:
And in response to a comment about police officers being murdered by snipers:
No, that's your myopic problem. I note that the Bible is replete with examples of great and ignoble men and women, from Ruth and David, to Jezebel and Judas. You think like a hammer and all you see are the nails.
Rather, being a man and not being a misogynist, knowing a large and diverse number of godly men who aren't remotely characterized fairly by that I'd never consider it. I also know there are people, like you, with a real and palpable hatred for that sex, one that blinds them to scripture, reason and reflection.
Demonize? I dismiss the indefensible fool who claims his actions are the responsibility of a victim. I don't care if Lady Godiva rides by my house. She'll ride by unmolested by me. A man who can't say that isn't really a man outside of the genetic description. Demonize? No, I hold him in appropriate contempt.
If you think finding rape detestable and failing to make excuses for the rapist makes you a sheep; and if you think finding the murder of policemen going about their duty to safeguard citizens makes you a sheep. Well then, "Baa-humbug."
You forgot the attribution...though I hear there's some difference of opinion as to whether it was Stalin, Hitler, Mao, or Caligula.
lain: