I am a person. One whole person. I have a spirit (singular).
Yes, that is because you are human, not because you are a person.
If I were comprised of three persons then you could justifiably state that I had three spirits.... Like Legion or something. So yes; three persons can be considered three spirits.
The problem with this assumption is that it inherently assumes that God is like man.
That is wrong. Man was made in the image and likeness of God, not the other way around.
God is One Spirit, who exists as three Persons, who coexist as one Being.
Your definition of "person" is lacking.
As far as the plurality in your doctrine is concerned; if the Temple
A temple is a building. Are you referring to the body of Jesus Christ? If so, just say Jesus' body.
of GOD contained the fullness of GOD per your doctrine
The fullness of God was in Jesus, not his body.
of three persons together equaling the fullness of GOD,
One God, three Persons.
then the three persons or spirits
There is only one Spirit, but He exists as three Persons.
that make your god
You mean the God of the Bible? Because that's who I'm talking about. If so, please show some respect and capitalize the word 'God.'
are three and contained within the vessel where as the vessel too has a spirit because He is also a complete man. That's four.
Complete and utter nonsense.
God is one Spirit, and He exists as three Persons. Jesus is a Person, the Father is a Person, and the Holy Spirit is a Person.
The three are one.
The three are 'ehad,' "one of plurality."
I don't ignore scripture or that the Jew was off the mark in more than one respect; not because they followed the words of Moses, or the commands of GOD; but because of greed and pride being their GOD and the cause of their misdirection and misdirecting.
What does this have to do with anything?
Can you give the scripture that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are like a husband and wife?
I thought three in a marriage was a crowd?
WHOOSH!!!!
Once more, you completely missed the point that was made. You are apparently not capable of comprehending what we are saying.
So.... If Abraham wouldn't have offered up his son he would have still been counted righteous?
Let me ask you this, Pops, when did Abraham offer up Isaac, before or after he was made righteous?
Do you really think that you prove three different Gods are written in the scriptures but called one?
Straw man. No one here believes in three Gods.
One means the same.
One of the many definitions of the english word 'one' is "identical; the same," but does not have the connotation you are imputing to it. But that is completely irrelevant because:
WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT THE ENGLISH WORD 'ONE'! How many times must that be said?
The Bible has been translated with the right word on this and it means one as in the same.
No, GT, that's your definition, not the actual definition of the word used.
'Echad' means 'one of plurality.'
'Echad,' which means "one," is used to describe God's plurality.
God says there is no one like Him and no one beside Him.
NO ONE HERE SAYS OTHERWISE!!!!!!!
When He says that He is not really saying there is no one like the three of them or beside the three of them.
*facepalm*
I can hardly believe you said that.
Well too bad, I said it because it's the truth.
God allows some evil to happen. He made hell and the lake of fire for a reason.
God does not "allow" evil to happen, as if He permits evil to happen on a case by case basis. It simply happens.
Do you really think that the bad would still have happened if God did not allow it?
Yes, I know that God does not "allow" people to disobey Him. They simply do because they are free agents, and God cannot stop them from exercising their will.
Whenever someone falsely judges me, I know then exactly what it is that they are.
GT: "I know you are, but what am I?"
You cannot nullify scripture with scripture.
No one here making the argument for the trinity has used scripture to nullify scripture. we have only shown the dispensations which are present in the Bible.
Paul says all scripture is useful for teaching and correcting and raining.
He was correct.
You then got a scripture that you do not understand and think that is takes away the scripture about all scripture is useful for training.
You're the one who can't even comprehend it, let alone fully understand it.
----
Pops:
Did Abraham offer up Isaac before or after he was justified/made righteous?
GT:
If I knowingly permit a man to murder his neighbor, am I to be held accountable for not stopping him?