glorydaz
Well-known member
Actually four according to your doctrine.
Though you can't see that most likely.
You poor blind fool.
There are none so blind as those who WILL NOT see. :nono:
Actually four according to your doctrine.
Though you can't see that most likely.
I don't really care to scold or get burned. I'd much rather actually discuss things peaceably to some profitable end. But you won't be having that now with you.Oh, those are my two options because that's all you are able to see. :chuckle:
No, you give several texts with multiple verses that are both broad and wide....as if you've actually made an argument. There are probably twenty arguments (more even) in that group....including scolding which is one of your favorite things.
Windmills
Those are the two options because the truth is simpleOh, those are my two options because that's all you are able to see. :chuckle:
No, you give several texts with multiple verses that are both broad and wide....as if you've actually made an argument. There are probably twenty arguments (more even) in that group....including scolding which is one of your favorite things.
Windmills
That's rather laughable coming from one who thinks he is allowed to knowingly sin and consider himself too made righteous by Christ.By saying "allow," you (perhaps unintentionally) make it seem like God is ok with people going against His will. That is not the case at all. I suggest you stop using the word "allow" to refer to something that happened. Because I assure you, God did not "allow" it to happen, it simply happened.
Except that is exactly what it says, especially to any unbelievers reading this thread. Words and ideas have consequences, Pops. You need to be mindful of that.
Yet all can see plainly the truth that flows from your mouth; all but you surely oh judge.You poor blind fool.
There are none so blind as those who WILL NOT see. :nono:
Not at all.
Three different persons is three different spirits by default.
Actually four according to your doctrine.
Though you can't see that most likely.
I am well aware that St. Paul preaches effectual faith though man would have us think the dead sort was spoken of and expounded upon.
Funny thing, context; more often than not, it spans actual chapters, showing the numeric divisions and even divisions of the chapters to be additions and needlessly divisive and too distractng from the actual content of the subject matter.
And my point is that what you say is polytheistic in its very root and source. Please check.
Not to mention am oxymoron.
I think I'm not going to respond to comments with improper usage of the word "too" in them.That's rather laughable coming from one who thinks he is allowed to knowingly sin and consider himself too made righteous by Christ.
You're missing the point. Golly, you people are dense.
My point is not that there are multiple words that mean one. My point is that the word used to describe God is not "one of singularity," as you and GT keep insisting, but that the word used means "one of plurality."
That's rather laughable coming from one who thinks he is allowed to knowingly sin and consider himself too made righteous by Christ.
Yet all can see plainly the truth that flows from your mouth; all but you surely oh judge.
I think I'm not going to respond to comments with improper usage of the word "too" in them.
If you want to speak, speak like a normal human being. Or was the word "also" never added to your vocabulary.
I am a person. One whole person. I have a spirit (singular).Incorrect.
Oh? And what are the other two, other than a divine nature and a human nature?
Something you seem to readily ignore.
"Elohim bara" "[Gods] [He created]"
"YHWH ehad" "[The Lord] [(is) one<plurality>]
Do you think those statements are oxymorons?
Because they're not. That's what the verses say.
To clarify ( thanks to @ 1Mind1Spirit )....whatever is not faith is sin. Abraham was still Abram when he took Hagar into his tent.
But, Abraham, like Saul/Paul, was "blameless" under the law. Righteousness is not found in law keeping.
I don't doubt we are to judge rightly and with mercy, silly; just that either of you judge a right of late.Laugh all you want.....believers are to judge all things.
That isn't you, Pops. You're unqualified to judge anything.
I do believe she's having another melt down. Laughing like a fool is the first sign.
Abraham and Paul were righteous for believing and obeying God.
Can you give the scripture that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are like a husband and wife?
I thought three in a marriage was a crowd?
GT, you won't learn anything until you renew your subscription.Can you give the scripture that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are like a husband and wife?
I thought three in a marriage was a crowd?
I don't doubt we are to judge rightly and with mercy, silly; just that either of you judge a right of late.
So.... If Abraham wouldn't have offered up his son he would have still been counted righteous?Of course. God's UNtruth is the truth teller, and the Apostle Paul was the Liar. :chuckle:
Romans 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
Romans 4:5-6 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness. Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,
Romans 10:10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Romans 10:22 And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness.
Yeah..... Uhm.....i've received it to an inexpressible extent.Silly? Back to kindergarten with you, Pops. :baby:
Don't expect mercy from me, it's God you need to believe....only then can you apply for His mercy and Grace.