God's Truth
New member
What did I say i didn't understand?
I generally state my ignorance before hand when it is indeed the case.
Your question proves it.
What did I say i didn't understand?
I generally state my ignorance before hand when it is indeed the case.
Dear God's Truth,
I am not prophesying about impending doom as much as I am really prophesying about the Return of Our Lord Jesus to save us all from evil and save the 'elect.'
Much Love & Kindness,
Michael
Members of the Godhead?
Members is plural and you have yet to provide scripture saying the godhead is the fullness of GOD rather than a fullness of the understanding of the nature and will of GOD as it pertains to man.
Dear Rosenritter,
I have to tell you that this time it is going to happen. These prophecies are to instruct people that God sends His prophets before He does anything major in the Earth. It is written in the Bible. I am not going to write down the specific signs, for there are quite a number of them. You will just have to wait for a week or two to discover the mysteries of God. See Rev. 10:7KJV, "But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to sound, the mystery of God should be finished, as he hath declared to his servants the prophets."
You have to wait and see, Rosenritter. I don't know what else to tell you without much typing. Thanks!
May God Give You Patience Yet,
Michael
You never straight out said no that you are not Evil Eve. This is what one should do when asked a question:
"No", or "Yes". You are very much like him though. Maybe you should find some kind of knowledge in that; that would be the positive thing to do. Why do you find it so insulting to be asked if you are Evil Eve? Tell me about that.
Learn some respect and do not call people outside of their name. It is that simple.
This is a debate site about scriptures and doctrines, and I really don't care about what you have to say about me personally. Discuss scriptures and do not discuss what you think of me. You are not a righteous judge in my opinion and are not fit in mind and heart and common sense to give anyone advice.
How about we only talk about doctrines?
That sounded so bizarre that I didn't take your accusation seriously. No, I am not Evil Eye: his writing style and thought process (and content) is completely different regardless. Do you want to ask if I am Lon or Ask Mr. Religion or anyone else, or are you satisfied with that.
Wouldn't those elect need to be saved from something though? Such as certain doom? I'm a little unclear on the specifics of this prophecy, There needs to be a sure and certain way of judging it fulfilled (or not) or it's not a prophecy. And if it were from God it would also need to have some purpose. True Christians don't need to be told that the Lord is coming, we already know this, and we know that we should be ready always. This means prepared in our heart and spirit, not short-selling stocks or mortgaging our homes.
There is always something happening in the world. North Korean dictators threatening their neighbors near and far, violence in the middle east, terror attacks real and staged, natural disaster,outbreaks of disease. You might say these are the "four horsemen" but these things have been with us for some time, and repetition of these things in these scales are not indications that the Apocalypse or Armageddon has now begun.
Neither are predictions that Jesus is about to reappear. Those have been going on for a long long time. Jesus tells us that we will not know the day nor the hour, and in the spirit of that passage I don't think it means that we're going to be told the week or the month or the year instead. Besides, if you consider the heart of God, do you really think he wants people who only will "put their hearts right" at the last moment if they think they are being watched? There's no point for giving a date.
Revelation 22:10-12 KJV
(10) And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand.
(11) He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still.
(12) And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.
The reason I am pressing you to list the exact specifics is not for my sake, but for yours. My prediction is that your prediction will not come to pass. I base my prediction on scripture, twofold: first, we are not to know the day nor the hour; and second, when a prophet has given failed prophecies before, we are not to heed them further.
While I reserve there is the theoretical possibility that a set of millions of people all staggering their guesses to cover all bases could attempt to "out-wit" God thinking that it will force God to "set back the date" to avoid coinciding with their prediction, the imagery is so absurd that I discount it entirely. If necessary, God would strike such an effort as he did the Tower of Babel with confusion or the father of the Baptist with silence.
So I would like specifics please, so that we will have a true inescapable method after the fact of judging whether you received a true prophecy. Should the prophecy fail (again) then it is to assist you in recovery and repentance, not for any purpose of cruelty. But should it seem to come to pass, I may have to reconsider my judgment.
Why do you continue with repeated lies? What is this supposed to gain you?
http://theologyonline.com/showthread...=1#post5070246
Also see here and here:Spoiler
It is impossible to have a doctrinal conversation with someone who is a compulsive liar. It might be one thing to make a false prediction, it's another to repeatedly lie when the evidence is plain for all to see. It is even more absurd when that very person blasphemously calls themselves "God's Truth." Were you of the spirit of God, you would know what to do here. Apparently you don't, and you certainly wouldn't listen if I told you. Prove me wrong on this.
If you want to talk to me, please use a private message. You've ignored mine so far.
Anyone want to talk about the three?
I would love to talk about that.
Excuse me?
We are discussing things peacably and you want to back out?
What gives, and what do you think I don't understand about the writings ascribed to St. Paul?
Quote Originally Posted by popsthebuilder View Post "Well, Paul says the eternal Godhead is clearly seen and understood by the created. Romans 1:20 " Okay I'm thinking and that doesn't jive with none ever seeing GOD as Jesus proclaims. But I must be missing something, so please; while my thinking cap is on; please do explain why that passage means whatever you are insinuating rather than the fact that the sons of GOD are the sole receptacles of true knowledge of GOD. |
Quote Originally Posted by popsthebuilder View Post
"Well, Paul says the eternal Godhead is clearly seen and understood by the created. Romans 1:20 "
Okay I'm thinking and that doesn't jive with none ever seeing GOD as Jesus proclaims. But I must be missing something, so please; while my thinking cap is on; please do explain why that passage means whatever you are insinuating rather than the fact that the sons of GOD are the sole receptacles of true knowledge of GOD.
Just try reading the text...exactly as it is written. I'm not "insinuating" it says anything other that what it clearly says. Man is without excuse for he was created with the knowledge of God IN HIM. Whether you believe what is written by Paul, or not, I'm simply telling you what he DID SAY.Romans 1:19-20 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Is that how you feel about scripture pertinent to your very actions?
Does that shame you at all?
Sorry; kinda personal I guess, but for real though; does it?
I agree with that completely; why would you assume otherwise?
Quote Originally Posted by popsthebuilder View Post
"Well, Paul says the eternal Godhead is clearly seen and understood by the created. Romans 1:20 "
Okay I'm thinking and that doesn't jive with none ever seeing GOD as Jesus proclaims. But I must be missing something, so please; while my thinking cap is on; please do explain why that passage means whatever you are insinuating rather than the fact that the sons of GOD are the sole receptacles of true knowledge of GOD.
Just try reading the text...exactly as it is written. I'm not "insinuating" it says anything other that what it clearly says. Man is without excuse for he was created with the knowledge of God IN HIM. Whether you believe what is written by Paul, or not, I'm simply telling you what he DID SAY.
Romans 1:19-20 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Oh? So what do I deny then?Nope, it doesn't shame me at all. I know the difference between a brother and sister in Christ, and you who prove you are false brethren by the way you deny what is plainly written while coming up with your own nonsensical theories.
I assure you I have come up with nothing. To what profit would it be for me to make up doctrine?Nope, it doesn't shame me at all. I know the difference between a brother and sister in Christ, and you who prove you are false brethren by the way you deny what is plainly written while coming up with your own nonsensical theories.
I think I understand what Glory is saying. You, Pops, being a man, already clearly see and understand the Godhead. That's what it said, right?
Romans 1:20 KJV
(20) For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Unless what Glory meant was that she clearly understands the Godhead but you do not. That could be it also.
For you to say"YOU UNDERSTAND NOTHING." is vanity and pride based on assumption and presupposition spoon fed to you by the hands of men with their own secret proud motives.Such a wild imagination you people have. YOU UNDERSTAND NOTHING.
All people have been created to know God, but it takes years for the proud among us to put off that which has been shown them. The little children know what you don't.
We see this when you folks do not glorify our Saviour as God, when you do not glorify the Holy Spirit as God....vain in your IMAGINATIONS, and your foolish heart is darkened.
Romans 1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
Look at you people...refusing to recognize the Godhead, refusing to admit that Jesus is God, making all these statements showing you do not understand how God is triune. You dispute the very verses that believers recognize as Father, Son, and Spirit being the ONE GOD, with one name.
Oh, you PEOPLE say...."three people" "how can three people fit into one man". If that isn't making God into an image of man, I don't know what is.
Romans 1:23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man,
For you to say"YOU UNDERSTAND NOTHING." is vanity and pride based on assumption and presupposition spoon fed to you by the hands of men with their own secret proud motives.
Let's go over your choice of words shall we? You said; "All people have been created to know God, but it takes years for
( the proud among us to put off that which has been shown them) "
I agree with that statement but it seems rather unfinished. I'm pretty sure you were implying that it was shown them by the hands of man. So I ask; who did your beliefs come from? What was the actual initial source that was readily and obviously responsible for your specific beliefs? It's rhetorical really as I'm quite sure your beliefs stemmed from your upbringing. I won't be delving into that direction any further as to not offend you, bit would as that you consider your blanket statements and words and judgements; and if you don't understand those things to be weighed against you, then perhaps you should consider it.