I highly doubt that you are too stupid to understand what I have written. In any case, whether you simply did not wish to actually read it, you were too tired, or you are somehow being intellectually dishonest (something else I highly doubt after previous conversations), I will shorten it for you.
No, not stupid. No, not refusing to read. Yes, actually tired and literally sick. But aside from that, I was actually losing track of your point.
What I am saying is that, no matter what context you look at, the meaning of the passage remains the same: It is impossible to recrucify Christ and start over as if nothing happened.
That makes sense.
In other words, it may be possible to lose your relationship with God by going back to living like the world, but it is impossible to lose your salvation:
That's the part that doesn't make sense. Salvation is a thing not yet received, which is why we are given the Holy Spirit in earnest until that time. If one rejects that Holy Spirit, knowing full well what it means and entails, how is there going back? Salvation isn't actually received until it is given, at the resurrection and atonement. We speak of it in the present tense because it is as good as its guarantor, but it goes without saying that we can break our part of the covenant.
therefore, those who have turned back to the world cannot turn back to God in the same way as when they first acknowledged Christ as Savior, for it is impossible to start over as if nothing has happened. No matter the context, no matter the version of the Bible you look at, it was written to believers (specifically Jewish) to encourage them to continue in spiritual maturity, and to give them hope and security in the finished work of Christ. I hope this clears up what I am saying.
It still doesn't look to me as if it is saying it is possible to turn back after that point. It speaks of the alternative being burning.
As I said previously, the falling away part (no matter which version you choose) does not change the overall meaning of the passage: and actually, as much as I dislike the Message, It conveys the actual meaning of the passage the best. Give that one a look.
I had looked at Message in one of those 18. I dislike it also, but for sake of discussion...
Hebrews 6:4-9 MSG
(4) Once people have seen the light, gotten a taste of heaven and been part of the work of the Holy Spirit,
(5) once they've personally experienced the sheer goodness of God's Word and the powers breaking in on us--
(6) if then they turn their backs on it, washing their hands of the whole thing, well, they can't start over as if nothing happened. That's impossible. Why, they've re-crucified Jesus! They've repudiated him in public!
(7) Parched ground that soaks up the rain and then produces an abundance of carrots and corn for its gardener gets God's "Well done!"
(8)
But if it produces weeds and thistles, it's more likely to get cussed out.
Fields like that are burned, not harvested.
(9) I'm sure that won't happen to you, friends. I have better things in mind for you--salvation things!