Who here has claimed that He did?
Straw man much...
No one has claimed that Christ used a modern-day Bible.
Talk about being lazy...
The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.
- Thread starter f.y.i
- Start date
Who here has claimed that He did?
Straw man much...
No one has claimed that Christ used a modern-day Bible.
Talk about being lazy...
Romans 10:4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.
Idolater
"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
Easter's not a fixed date according to the Christian (Catholic) calendar either.
Christ is the Church's Passover.
Easter always on a Sunday according to the church. Where Jews that go by their lunisolar calendar celebrated Passover this year on the Saturday 27 of March . But I’m using their calendar according to what Jesus Christ believed. By the way you’re celebrating his resurrection according to the council of Nicaea 325 ad . Not his Passover “do this in remembrance of me” . Learn the difference.
“To those outside the law I became like one outside the law—though I am not outside God’s law but within the law of Christ—to win over those outside the law.”
1 Corinthians 9:21 NABRE
https://www.bible.com/bible/463/1co.9.21.nabre
Thank you for conceding the debate!
How did I concede . When everyone knows Jesus Christ did his God and Father will . Matthew 6:9,10 , John 17:3,25 . Unless your practicing Monophysitism .
“Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned—
For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous.”
Romans 5:12, 19 ESV
https://www.bible.com/bible/59/rom.5.12,19.esv
“For every high priest chosen from among men is appointed to act on behalf of men in relation to God, to offer gifts and sacrifices for sins. He can deal gently with the ignorant and wayward, since he himself is beset with weakness. Because of this he is bound to offer sacrifice for his own sins as well as for those of the people. And one does not take the honor upon himself, but he is called by God, just as Aaron was. So also Christ did not exalt himself to be made a high priest, but was appointed by him who said to him, “Thou art my Son, today I have begotten thee”; as he says also in another place, “Thou art a priest for ever, after the order of Melchizedek.” In the days of his flesh, Jesus offered up prayers and supplications, with loud cries and tears, to him who was able to save him from death, and he was heard for his godly fear. Although he was a Son, he learned obedience through what he suffered; and being made perfect he became the source of eternal salvation to all who obey him, being designated by God a high priest after the order of Melchizedek. About this we have much to say which is hard to explain, since you have become dull of hearing. For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need some one to teach you again the first principles of God's word. You need milk, not solid food; for every one who lives on milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a child. But solid food is for the mature, for those who have their faculties trained by practice to distinguish good from evil.”
Hebrews 5:1-14 RSV-CI
https://www.bible.com/bible/2017/heb.5.1-14.rsv-ci
By quoting a verse that argues my side of the "debate". Not that you could call this a debate. Debate requires that both sides use logic and present rational arguments based on established premises. You are quite clearly incapable of anything approaching actual debate, nor are you even interested in such.
Who taught you how to type?
It's "you're" not "your" and I don't like sesquipedalians. No one does.
And stop trying to change the subject!
Again, thank you for conceding the debate!
Incidentally, who was the book of Hebrews written too?
Clete