Robert's Gospel According to the Apostle Paul
At least you finally admit that you follow your own made up crap and not the true Word of God.
Robert's Gospel According to the Apostle Paul
Why did God go through all the trouble to separate Israel from the gentiles and give them all of these things if he was just going to remove them later?
Why did God call Paul when He had already called TWELVE apostles and sent them to all nations?
Specifically for the purpose a pure lineage of the promised Messiah. .
Because that job is bigger than any twelve people: God has called a lot more people than Paul.
And what was that new commandment?
And why did the Lord give Paul revelations He had not given to the twelve?
I'm not expecting an answer, but merely pointing out that Rosenritter speaks without understanding.
Ah, so this is what is being said during those "This message is hidden because the user is on your ignore list" posts.
Please do me a favor: if you are directing something for my attention, drop me a private message.
You might try searching on the words "new commandment" for an indication of the answer to your question.
Why did the Lord give Peter revelations that he did not give to the other twelve or to Paul?
Why did the Lord give John revelations that he gave to none of the other twelve or Paul? That question needs no special answer, it is sufficient for God to send revelation in the time and manner and through the prophets that he wishes. God has worked through many servants and prophets and not every one receives the same special revelation.
And I already know you don't want an answer or a discussion.
You're here to snipe, which is why you're on my ignore list. Message me if you actually want to talk.
I figured that something like that would be your lame answer.Specifically for the purpose a pure lineage of the promised Messiah. .
Another completely lame and ridiculous "conclusion".Because that job is bigger than any twelve people: God has called a lot more people than Paul.
I should have known better than to cast my pearls before reprobates.
Why did God call Paul when He had already called TWELVE apostles and sent them to all nations?
Because that job is bigger than any twelve people: God has called a lot more people than Paul.
I figured that something like that would be your lame answer.
How does separating ISRAEL from the gentiles create this "pure lineage"?
And what do ALL of the other things have to do with that simple thing?
Why did all of those things take CENTURIES to accomplish that simple thing?
What about God promising them a kingdom ON THE EARTH?
You have SO much to learn.
Another completely lame and ridiculous "conclusion".
Apparently you are too ignorant to understand the significance of calling TWELVE apostles that will sit on TWELVE thrones judging the TWELVE tribes of Israel. And also the calling of the ONE apostle to deliver the mystery of Christ to ALL without distinction.
So you conflate OTHER people with these APOSTLES?
It's really surprising how little you know, but how much you think that you know.
She is asked, poignantly, by GD:,
Observe, the humanism, comedy:
Power from on high,with miraculous gifts, filled with the Holy Spirit, "Boot Camp" with the Lord Jesus Christ for 40 days, and yet, "too big a job."
That's rich-I needed a chuckle today, during this heathen "Happy Holidays."
That was RD's poignant question.
Mine were the easy ones.
Edit...Gosh you're quick. You fixed it already.
You both are poignant-and quicker than me!
wrong...He said “think NOT I have come to abolish the Law”...or change it...which is another method of abolishing the prior law with a latter...He'd nail that Old Covenant to the cross
wrong...even Paul circumcised...but it was just made of no effect as there were no more jew et al...but it was always about the circumcision of the heartwith its circumcisions,
Paul continued even made a vow...we all should sacrifice and with our lips baptism etcits sacrifices...
oh sure that was ripped but NOT the Law in fact NOW with the veil ripped WHOSOEVER believeth can be saved approaching the mercy seat with the Law in it...its temple veil,
yup the ministration of the Law was indeed changed TRANSFERED just not the Law itself was abolished...its Levitical priesthood,
that was EXACTLY abolished and now WHOSOEVER believeth is a sovereign citizen of the law full kingdom of Israel...you know His people...its separation between Jew and Gentile,
Peter continued kosherits unclean meats,
pray Sabbaths not be broken in future times of troublesabbaths,
yes look those up again...learn which one went where into which covenant...the new one being sealed PRIOR His death...no changes OKcommandments, laws, and ordinances.
yup... Let’s read that one slowly together...And he'd give us a new commandment in its place,
rise from the dead, confirm his status as the LORD of Hosts through his ascension, and then speak to the twelve and Paul to make sure they understood.
Get some new material.
If the law was "abolished" at the cross, why does Paul tell us that we are not under it?
How can we "not be under" something that does not exist?
Yup...Paul actually says we establish Law...neat eh?
Prolly meant wherever we go to whoever we meet...
And the law we establish is just like His or nearly or maybe not even for us?
He'd nail that Old Covenant to the cross with its circumcisions, its sacrifices, its temple veil, its Levitical priesthood, its separation between Jew and Gentile, its unclean meats, sabbaths, commandments, laws, and ordinances.
And he'd give us a new commandment in its place, rise from the dead, confirm his status as the LORD of Hosts through his ascension, and then speak to the twelve and Paul to make sure they understood.
It wasnt even about them but a promise He made to Abraham their father...Why did God go through all the trouble to separate Israel from the gentiles and give them all of these things if he was just going to remove them later?
uh...cuz all these nations were only jewish?Why did God call Paul when He had already called TWELVE apostles and sent them to all nations?
you mean the love as I loved you one?...that thing has been around for awhile now...almost brand new though hardly used...since not even jews did that...And what was that new commandment?
you mean revelations that opposed prior treaching? Oh wait He didnt...And why did the Lord give Paul revelations He had not given to the twelve?
At least you finally admit that you follow your own made up crap and not the true Word of God.
not sure what you mean by pure lineage as that lineage has a few bad woman and goyim in it...Specifically for the purpose a pure lineage of the promised Messiah.