Proof from the Bible that God is In Time

Status
Not open for further replies.

godrulz

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
Oh, so admit that you add philosophy to your understanding of Biblical text? hmm....as if I didn't know.

I give biblical support for endless time vs timelessness. Your timelessness view is explicitly Platonic philosophy, not biblical truth. Godly philosophy is needed in some areas (free will vs determinism debate, nature of time, etc.) since Scripture does not resolve these issues. Mature Christian thinkers give supremacy to Scripture, but also recognize the need for sound logic, godly philosophy, etc. You wrongly assume all philosophy is false or pagan (nope).
 

sky.

BANNED
Banned
I give biblical support for endless time vs timelessness. Your timelessness view is explicitly Platonic philosophy, not biblical truth. Godly philosophy is needed in some areas (free will vs determinism debate, nature of time, etc.) since Scripture does not resolve these issues. Mature Christian thinkers give supremacy to Scripture, but also recognize the need for sound logic, godly philosophy, etc. You wrongly assume all philosophy is false or pagan (nope).

"Godly philosophy"? never heard of it, thanks for the heads up.
 

godrulz

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
"Godly philosophy"? never heard of it, thanks for the heads up.

Many of your classical views on the attributes of God are influenced by Thomas Aquinas philosophy on 'being', etc. (which had some Platonic, Augustinian influences, etc.). They are not explicitly biblical (aseity, impassibility, simplicity, etc.). We affirm the trinity within biblical parameters, but when we rightly talk about things like homoousias, etc., we are more in the realm of godly (vs pagan) philosophy (love of truth, etc.), than biblical proof texts.

Likewise, epistemology, logic, etc. can help us form right biblical views not found in proof texts, etc.
 

sky.

BANNED
Banned
Many of your classical views on the attributes of God are influenced by Thomas Aquinas philosophy on 'being', etc. (which had some Platonic, Augustinian influences, etc.). They are not explicitly biblical (aseity, impassibility, simplicity, etc.). We affirm the trinity within biblical parameters, but when we rightly talk about things like homoousias, etc., we are more in the realm of godly (vs pagan) philosophy (love of truth, etc.), than biblical proof texts.

Likewise, epistemology, logic, etc. can help us form right biblical views not found in proof texts, etc.

Never heard of the people you speak of. I have no idea what you are getting at. Do you ever use Scripture when talking about God?
 

godrulz

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
Never heard of the people you speak of. I have no idea what you are getting at. Do you ever use Scripture when talking about God?

Don't be naive. Your classical views have been influenced by Augustine, etc. Equally capable, godly believers read the same Bible and come to different conclusions, but all are not right.

If you want to discuss the Deity of Christ vs Arianism, I will use Scripture. If you want to have detailed discussion on the nature of free will, time vs eternity, etc., then we will use Scripture and critical thinking, speculation, logic, etc.
 

sky.

BANNED
Banned
Many of your classical views on the attributes of God are influenced by Thomas Aquinas philosophy on 'being', etc. (which had some Platonic, Augustinian influences, etc.). They are not explicitly biblical (aseity, impassibility, simplicity, etc.). We affirm the trinity within biblical parameters, but when we rightly talk about things like homoousias, etc., we are more in the realm of godly (vs pagan) philosophy (love of truth, etc.), than biblical proof texts.

Likewise, epistemology, logic, etc. can help us form right biblical views not found in proof texts, etc.

Don't be naive. Your classical views have been influenced by Augustine, etc. Equally capable, godly believers read the same Bible and come to different conclusions, but all are not right.

If you want to discuss the Deity of Christ vs Arianism, I will use Scripture. If you want to have detailed discussion on the nature of free will, time vs eternity, etc., then we will use Scripture and critical thinking, speculation, logic, etc.

I already don't trust you. You have slippery words and concepts and in your last two posts you forgot to captalize the word Godly.
 

godrulz

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
Godly is an adjective and is not capitalized in a sentence....godly believer. It is cap at the start of a sentence. God is a proper name and is capitalized if the true God, but a false god is not. In Greek, theos=GOD or god and is not capitalized.
 

sky.

BANNED
Banned
Godly is an adjective and is not capitalized in a sentence....godly believer. It is cap at the start of a sentence. God is a proper name and is capitalized if the true God, but a false god is not. In Greek, theos=GOD or god and is not capitalized.

Don't care. Capitalize it.
 

godrulz

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
Don't care. Capitalize it.

So, you are going to go against proper English grammar out of arrogant ignorance and demand the rest of us to be in error? Why trust your theology if you can't get grade school English grammar right?!

What a dweeb.
 

sky.

BANNED
Banned
So, you are going to go against proper English grammar out of arrogant ignorance and demand the rest of us to be in error? Why trust your theology if you can't get grade school English grammar right?!

What a dweeb.

You don't use Scripture, that also puts you outside of the realm of trust as far as anything you have to say regarding God.

Capitalizing aside. You are slippery with the Word of God.
 

Lighthouse

The Dark Knight
Gold Subscriber
Hall of Fame
Genesis 22:12

------------------------

Really then why did God provide a ram already waiting in that very place to be slain in the place of Isaac?

Genesis 22:13
13 Then Abraham looked up and saw a ram caught by its horns in a bush. So he took the ram and sacrificed it as a burnt offering on the altar in place of his son.

------------------------
So God's a liar now?

Did it seriously never occur to you that God put the ram there to be prepared? Or maybe the ram worked for either outcome, because if Abraham were disobedient he would need a sin sacrifice.

You change your name to "night sky," or "cloudy sky," because you're clearly not very bright.

Time is one of God's creations. God can be in time when and as he wants to be to communicate with his creation and that's what we read in the bible. But, to suggest that he can only live right along in time with us would mean he is somehow limited by his own creation. In that case, who, then is really the creator? God or Time?
Where is the Scripture stating that time is a creation?

I get that, but how can you and I read and know this post and God be ignorant of it?! How can God judge if He does not know all of reality? Classical views of omniscience are flawed, but you compromise even an Open Theist understanding. Your view is not biblically, logically defensible.
Because He's God; He is sovereign; if He doesn't want to know He doesn't have to.

Your question makes no sense to someone who believes God exists outside of time, but it's a great way of illustrating the point.
Why do you believe God exists outside of time? Why do you believe time is such that there exists an outside?
 

sky.

BANNED
Banned
So God's a liar now?

Did it seriously never occur to you that God put the ram there to be prepared? Or maybe the ram worked for either outcome, because if Abraham were disobedient he would need a sin sacrifice.

You change your name to "night sky," or "cloudy sky," because you're clearly not very bright.

You need to learn to read angry boy.
 

Aimiel

Well-known member
God was providential and provided for every contingency. He knew with probability, but not certainty. Abe could have totally disobeyed and failed the test. The final result was not in until the test was over. God knows reality as it is and does not see the non-existent future the same way He sees the extant past/present.
If God didn't know the end of time from the beginning, then what He made wouldn't be good or even complete, it would just be a guess. He knows of a certainty everything that will EVER happen, since He is God. God knows who will pass and who will fail every test. The test isn't so that He can find out, it's so He can prove those who are His. It's so they appreciate Him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top