He blows alright.
New Low From Trump
- Thread starter PureX
- Start date
Trump is definitely your man.
Thanks for creating a silver lining for what would otherwise be a grim, dark cloud of an election day. :e4e:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
lain:
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Melania Trump’s demand for a retraction by People magazine is simply amazing
To review: Melania Trump is not disputing Stoynoff's claim that Donald Trump assaulted her. Melania Trump is disputing Stoynoff's claim that the two women had a chance encounter on a city street several months later.
Is this for real? It's almost as if Melania Trump is trolling her own husband — rejecting the defamatory notion that she would be friendly with, or even recognize, a reporter, while declining to challenge the idea that Donald Trump stuck his tongue down the throat of the same journalist.
(Update: In an Oct. 17 interview on CNN, Melania Trump repeated her claim that she did not meet Stoynoff on a street in New York and claimed the whole article was "discredited." A day later, People said one of Stoynoff's friends was an eye witness to the chance encounter. The magazine also published the accounts of five people who say Stoynoff told them about Trump's attack shortly after it happened.)
Is this for real? It's almost as if Melania Trump is trolling her own husband — rejecting the defamatory notion that she would be friendly with, or even recognize, a reporter, while declining to challenge the idea that Donald Trump stuck his tongue down the throat of the same journalist.
(Update: In an Oct. 17 interview on CNN, Melania Trump repeated her claim that she did not meet Stoynoff on a street in New York and claimed the whole article was "discredited." A day later, People said one of Stoynoff's friends was an eye witness to the chance encounter. The magazine also published the accounts of five people who say Stoynoff told them about Trump's attack shortly after it happened.)
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Trump can't even get support from Howard Stern:
Shock jock Howard Stern on Monday refuted his friend Donald Trump’s claim that his leaked comments about grabbing women’s genitals were just “locker room talk.”
“I have never been in the room when someone has said, 'Grab them by the [redacted]," Stern said on his Sirius satellite radio show, quoting Trump’s own words caught on a hot mic during a 2005 “Access Hollywood” appearance. "No one's ever advocated going that step where you get a little bit, 'Hey I'm going to invade someone's space.'"
“I have never been in the room when someone has said, 'Grab them by the [redacted]," Stern said on his Sirius satellite radio show, quoting Trump’s own words caught on a hot mic during a 2005 “Access Hollywood” appearance. "No one's ever advocated going that step where you get a little bit, 'Hey I'm going to invade someone's space.'"
^ Now you look to that freak as your support? You just keep sinking lower and lower into the gutter.
He is 70, how many more could he possibly have?
The Berean
Well-known member
These dirty old men always chase younger women. Hugh Hefner is 90 and his current wife is 30. That's just gross.
Sent from my SM-G920V using TheologyOnline mobile app
Remember the tycoon, J. Howard Marshall?
He was 62 years OLDER THAN Anna Nicole Smith, when she married him.
Apparantly some old geezers have a great deal of mileage to go before they croak, lol
The Brennan Center’s ongoing examination of voter fraud claims reveal that voter fraud is very rare, voter impersonation is nearly non-existent, and much of the problems associated with alleged fraud in elections relates to unintentional mistakes by voters or election administrators. Our report "
The Truth About Voter Fraud" reveals most allegations of fraud turn out to be baseless — and that of the few allegations remaining, most reveal election irregularities and other forms of election misconduct. Click here for additional resources on fraud.
The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law
The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law
[h=1]Donald Trump's Pants on Fire claim of 'large scale voter fraud' - Politifact[/h]
Study Finds No Evidence of Widespread Voter Fraud - NBC
A study of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases in 50 states between 2000 and 2012 found the level of fraud was infinitesimal compared with the 146 million voters registered over the 12-year period.
A study of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases in 50 states between 2000 and 2012 found the level of fraud was infinitesimal compared with the 146 million voters registered over the 12-year period.
The analysis found only 10 cases of voter impersonation, the only kind of fraud that could be prevented by voter ID at the polls.
And so on.
[h=1][/h]
Fraudulent voting has been happening for years. Even George Will, who HATES Trump, said as much:
...........Washington Post columnist George Will, who has been one of GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump’s biggest detractors throughout the 2016 presidential election cycle on the right, admitted Trump has a point when he says the election process in the United States was “rigged.”
Will argued Trump should make the point about rigged elections “more clearly” and pointed evidence he said that proves the process was “rigged.”
“[W]hen Mr. Trump talks about it being rigged, he sweeps all his grievances into one big puddle,” Will said. “He talks about the media. He talked about the primaries. He talked about the polls, talked about the Republican National Committee. I think when most Americans hear that an election is rigged, they think of government action to rig the election. And there Mr. Trump has a point if he would make it more clearly. It is hard to think of an innocent reason why Democrats spend so much time, energy, and money, scarce resources, resisting attempts to purge the voter rolls, that is to remove people who are dead or have otherwise left the jurisdiction. It’s hard to think of an innocent reason why they fight so tremendously against voter I.D. laws. They say, well, that burdens the, exercise of a fundamental right. The Supreme Court said that travel is a fundamental right. No one thinks that showing an I.D. at the airport burdens that fundamental right.”
“We know — we don’t surmise,” he continued. “We know that the 2010, ’12, and ’14 elections were rigged by the most intrusive and potentially punitive institution of the federal government, the IRS,” he continued. “You can read all about it in Kim Strassel’s book ‘The Intimidation Game.’ She’s familiar to all Wall Street Journal readers and Fox viewers. So this is not a surmise. And I have talked to lawyers in a position to know, they say it’s still going on — that the IRS is still intolerably delaying the granting of tax exempt status to conservative advocacy groups to skew the persuasion of this campaign.”
VIDEO AND QUOTE LINK
Last edited by a moderator:
The fact is that every serious look at election fraud using reviewed methodology comes to the same conclusion: it happens, but it's marginal and in no case determines the outcome of elections. The closest we've arguably come to impacting one would be what happened to Gore in Florida, where a potentially deciding margin was culled from a mostly democratic base.
That's the distinction of serious research, not the op/ed of a partisan columnist who is smart enough to know better...this sudden turn in rhetoric on the far right tells me that you've finally accepted what the numbers are really saying, will table Rasmussen and get on with the process of grieving.
I will bet if he gets a really big show he might marry someone who speaks better English
Here it is, you do not hear about many old ladies married to men in their 20s. Now do men refuse to marry for money, while women are willing to do so. Do not try to sell me on the notion they are in love. Why the difference>
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
She was in love with hismoneywinning personality and how much they had in common.
he looks pretty darned happy :idunno:
Tattooed Theist
New member
At the very least it's a bad example to other old rich men and greedy young ladies.
but, eh, whatever :sheep: