If it's taking him this long to type up the gospel, there's something very wrong.
This was my first post from last evening. It isn't personal. It's addressed to Dispensationalists in general based upon doctrine.
The same one you espouse by elpis (hope/trust) rather than pistis (faith); which makes true faith look like arrogance.
You've never read any of it.Yes, it can easily seem so. Identity and Postition are near-miss attempts at addressing ontology. They're just labels instead actually "being". And that too often is "being" as a verb rather than resting in Christ, which is just "doing".
Christ spoke in parables to hide truth from those who'd already rejected it. I asked you to explain yourself in the plainest possible language and you can't or won't. I suspect won't...if you do, the paucity of your doctrine will become evident.Not necessarily, that's absurd. Jesus Himself spoke in parables, and Paul says things hard to understand, according to Peter.
We (MADs) agree 100% with that. There's no work FOR salvation or righteousness - that is, to gain or to keep them - that's left for us to do. Christ did it all and we're complete in Him. All the MADs here believe that. The rest of TOL? Not so much. But we do. Of course you'll reject that simply because we're not you.It's the rest in Christ without works, but it inevitably produces the works OF faith.
So blinded by your own pride you don't even see it.Please recall that you indicated you got your view of identity from reading books... from books by a human author.
* * *
That's why I spend 60 hours each week teaching others.
So we're influenced by Satan while in the womb? You are insane and this will be my last post to you.Nope. You've been subverted by the devices of Satan through language. You can't even examine it yourself because it began gestationally and in the sub-cognitive limbic system. Now it's the foundation for your rational reasoning, which is neither.
Petty. Childish. You never impressed me. I'm the one who impressed you, then disappointed you, remember? You wanted me. "So close!" you said. You were so impressed with me that you said I was the only one on TOL even close to grasping your spiritual "level," so you wanted my scalp on your belt. Want me to pull the posts to prove it?And I don't need you. See how that works?
Nope. Colossians 2:13, Romans 8:1, Romans 8:39.I see you still cling to a law-based form of repeated repentance.
Oh, so now you've changed your mind about me. The Emperor can't turn Luke, so now he'll destroy him. You're a joke, and you're frightening.You're not in the prosopon of Christ, instead putting new wine in old wineskins. But I'm not offering anything.
God Himself is a dispensationalist. Ask someone else here how we know that, and why you don't. They'll tell you. I'm done with you.Dispensationalism is a part of what Paul foretold. But you can't see that with that veil.
Trapped by the devices of Satan, your Father.
I'm honored, as your imitating me. Of course, that makes sense, Skippy, as your father the devil, is the great imitator. He is applauding you right now, Cain Jr.
Take a seat, after your bow...
And that would be small "f," not the cap "F," that you posted, as the bible is a book of details. And you are trying to impress us, with those fancy words, you spam, on TOL, Ellie Mae?
God the Father
your father, the devil
Contrasts, like heaven, vs. hell.
When will someone substantiate the claim that Crowley learned dispensationalism from Darby? Or will one refuted lie simply be replaced with another?
John Nelson Darby (Dispensationalism) was a lot like Joseph Smith (Mormonism) and Charles Taze Russell (Jehova's Witnesses).
Joseph Smith called himself and his Mormon followers "Latter-Day Saints". The reason Smith chose this name was because Smith thought the 1830's were the latter days.
Charles Taze Russell and a few hundred men, women, and children followers of him put on white robes and gathered before sunrise on a bridge here in Pittsburgh in 1903. They did so because they were convinced that day was the end of the world.
John Nelson Darby, and Dispensationalists since Darby have constantly taught that they were living in the last days. Hal Lindsay is a Dispensationalist and Darby follower. His book "The Late Great Planet Earth" is Exhibit A of the doomsday hysteria associated with Dispensationalism.
Dispensationalism, Mormonism, and JW's are all "Doomsday" teachings.
Darby's "rapture" is no different than Joseph Smith's "latter-days"
I will show in a subsequent post how Darby changed many verses in the KJV to show the "last days" were the mid-1800's when he wrote his Darby Bible.
The following doesn't prove it, but it's an informative article about Crowley and Darby from someone who has read Crowley's biography and other works:
"The Master Therion himself left us a few notes about his life. We have read his biography and know what came of the boy that sat with his family on Sundays listening to the sermons of John Nelson Darby.
While young Aleister sat with his family on Sunday morning he would listen in awe to the teachings that the charismatic John Nelson Darby delivered with magical flourishes. " - SOURCE
The following doesn't prove it but
" The thing is... We know how Crowley turned out after listening to Darby's interpretation of the fate of mankind in his early years. Now that the great majority of protestants believe in the Rapture myth and every doomsday death wish that this entitles them to, I wonder... If the Plymouth Brethren -from whose bosom the Master Therion emerged- are the original exponents of this doctrine; how many Crowley's is the modern Protestant movement -basically millions of clones of Darby's church- creating?
Time will tell. I think Crowley was just the first fruit."
The Aleister Crowley Society
What a self-refuting idiot.