heir
TOL Subscriber
I don't follow Darby. I follow Paul. Who do you follow?
ECT Gomer Tetelestai does it again...Shazam!
- Thread starter john w
- Start date
I don't follow Darby. I follow Paul. Who do you follow?
Maybe you should do a study on what the Apostle Paul says about grieving and quenching the Holy Spirit.
heir
TOL Subscriber
Nope. I'm in the Body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12:13 KJV)
If you're not following Paul (1 Corinthians 4:15-16 KJV), you could be following another Jesus (2 Corinthians 11:3-4 KJV)!
heir
TOL Subscriber
Why?
You should read the part in verse 4 about "another gospel"
I don't know how you can, and claim Peter preached another gospel.
One of his "Hail Mary" spams, to which he resorts, after heir/others have him cornered. That's all the bullets the punk has.
No, you are not. You are a Russell and Hanegraaf follower.
You're in denial
Fun! The Preterist Perverter taught us this debate ender!!
Punk.
Last edited:
Yet another Darby follower who can't defend the false teachings of John Nelson Darby.
Spammed, word for word, for the 556th time in the last 3 months.
You are a Russell and Hanegraaf follower,
who can't defend the false teachings of these "fallable" teachers.
You taught us that, clownie.
You should read the part in the bible, about what it says, happens, to perverters, like yourself, that claim that Judas preached this "just one gospel"(your words).
Have a nice trip, punk.
Another satanic, false accusation by Craigie Tet.:
"Darby followers are taught to take everything literal."-Tet
Post #79
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4377534#post4377534
Read it-"everything."
Your father taught you well.
Add that to:
"All Dispensationalists are Darby followers."-Craigie the Clown Tet.
"Darby followers are taught to take everything literal."-Tet
Post #79
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4377534#post4377534
Read it-"everything."
Your father taught you well.
Add that to:
"All Dispensationalists are Darby followers."-Craigie the Clown Tet.
Galatians 2
11 Now when Peter had come to Antioch, I withstood him to his face, because he was to be blamed; 12 for before certain men came from James, he would eat with the Gentiles; but when they came, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing those who were of the circumcision. 13 And the rest of the Jews also played the hypocrite with him, so that even Barnabas was carried away with their hypocrisy.
14 But when I saw that they were not straightforward about the truth of the gospel, I said to Peter before them all, “If you, being a Jew, live in the manner of Gentiles and not as the Jews, why do you compel Gentiles to live as Jews?
Sometimes it is as if those that argue against what the Bible clearly shows have even read it at all. I realize doogietalons, granite, and others just don't care. I am not talking about them. I am talking about the militant "Christians" that are wolves in sheep's clothing.
How can you be this dense?
"And the rest of the Jews also played the hypocrite with him"
Galatians 2
11 Now when Peter had come to Antioch, I withstood him to his face, because he was to be blamed; 12 for before certain men came from James, he would eat with the Gentiles; but when they came, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing those who were of the circumcision. 13 And the rest of the Jews also played the hypocrite with him, so that even Barnabas was carried away with their hypocrisy.
14 But when I saw that they were not straightforward about the truth of the gospel, I said to Peter before them all, “If you, being a Jew, live in the manner of Gentiles and not as the Jews, why do you compel Gentiles to live as Jews?
And Tet brings up James and others to misdirect from the fact that Peter was not straightforward with the gospel, making them live as Jews as per Genesis 12.
Again Nick, the verses you provide prove you wrong.
Notice Paul says "the gospel"?
There was only one gospel Paul and Peter were preaching.
Paul even tells us that Peter, who was a Jew, lived like a Gentile.
Dialogos
Well-known member
:think:
A good point me'thinks.
Why would Paul be accurate in saying that Peter wasn't straightforward with the gospel when Peter's gospel was different?
Also, why does the text say that that the rest of the Jews acted hypocritically if they weren't also part of the body of Christ?
Nick, why couldn't Peter and the Jews saved by Peter's gospel eat separate from Gentiles? According to you there weren't part of the same body, right?
heir
TOL Subscriber
Then it makes absolutely no sense for Paul top go up by revelation (meaning he was told to go) and communicate unto them "that gospel" which he preached among the Gentiles.
Galatians 2:1 Then fourteen years after I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and took Titus with me also.
Galatians 2:2 And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to them which were of reputation, lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain.
heir
TOL Subscriber
Acts 10:35 KJV and Titus 3:5 KJV are not the same "good news" (gospel=good news)!