Search results

It's not against the rules to address content of banned posters and Rusha *hates* free speech as much as I do, that is to say not at all.

Given that the choice was between Biden & another 4 years of Captain Bonespurs there was only one outcome that would be in the realms of sanity and thankfully was made. You sound rather familiar also...

There was no evidence of anything in the scenario so it was unclear as to whether the wife's complaint was because her husband had forced her into sex or not. If her friend considered her complaint to be rape then that actually does imply force but it can't be determined by that alone. I would...

If only some of you on the far right had any...

Of course not.

No, absolutely no need.

Only if it can be determined, otherwise no, not at all. Could hardly be clearer.

Nope, but no surprise that you persist with this loony tune stuff. I've answered this all ends up. The scenario was vague, nothing is specified as to why the woman is unhappy with sex on the Tuesday so it can't be determined if the husband forced her into sex or not. He would be guilty if so and...

What are you prattling on about now? That was my response to Derf after posting his lame scenario, that was it. How is that "inserting into someone else's ideas"?! Of course my responses are not Derf's ideas, duh...

Found who guilty? The hypothetical husband where it hasn't been determined in the scenario whether he's forced sex on his wife? You're all over the map, even more so than normal.

My initial response to Derf after he'd presented his scenario: "Your scenario is lame as anything frankly. Do you honesty think that loving married couples have sex on set days or something? If the wife complained to a friend that her supposedly loving and cherishing husband had forced her...

If that's in reference to me then I know fine well I ain't thanks. Could hardly have been any clearer on this topic from the outset including your feeble scenario.

He presented a scenario that didn't specify whether force was involved or not. All that's "apparent" is that the wife wasn't happy with sex on Tuesday, it doesn't state why that is. As already explained - in what could hardly be clearer terms - if she was forced into it by her husband then he is...

Why hey there you...strange person. Good for you cos they're indefensible. Nope, sure didn't as any honest reading would establish and especially after having to walk you through it all and everything and no reason to edit my posts anyway. If you perpetuate the same asinine nonsense about...

I've responded to this once again with baby steps so the pair of you might be able to keep up. In the scenario presented it was too vague as to what the wife was unhappy about as outlined in my last. What isn't vague is your asinine nonsense about stating that I consider it rape if a woman has...

Sad thing is, some folk will believe it just as they bought into 'Q'...

Says it all doesn't it?

Heck, maybe this stuff does need to be spoonfed to the likes of you and Stripe. If the wife complains to her friend that she wasn't happy about Tuesdays "tryst" because she didn't feel like sex but her husband forced it on her anyway then her friend is right to call that rape. Given the...

There's some more irony but Stripes accusations as well as yours associated are unfounded. Addressed all ends up and all the posts are there. I sure ain't editing them.

Nope, not at all. I addressed his scenario, lame as it was and you're bringing nothing but the same tired stuff as per usual.