Search results

Of course it has a criminal. If a husband forces sex onto his wife he's a rapist - ergo a criminal. Your bizarre ramble about Hunter Biden has nothing to do with rape so no, I don't in any way come to anything resembling your warped conclusions at all.

Nope, no need as anyone without some childish little axe to grind will well be able to see.

Realistically they wouldn't as so difficult to prove sans security cams in the house and bedroom. My requirement: 100% proof of guilt. You, on the other hand don't consider it rape if a husband forces himself on his wife anyway so what do you care?

His scenario was lame as pointed out. Nope. A person should only be convicted of rape if they're guilty of it. Got the memo now?

No I don't, at all so that's a fail.

Already addressed and in context. "Silly" is being generous but you continue with your lame little tropes if ya want. Once again, spam would be a step up for you frankly.

He was answered honestly. Bored much?

To pick up on this asinine post of yours again, no, not at all and as much as you like to throw the term 'liar' about then you've absolutely made one of yourself. Nowhere, ever on here or anywhere else have I reduced rape to anything akin. I can sure understand women having regrets after sex...

Try under 'V'. There ya go!

Rape occurs numerous times within couples whether married or not and elsewhere. The percentage of rapists being caught and tried is as low as 6% unfortunately and within relationships it's difficult to prove as MaryContrary pointed out earlier. You're advocating that a husband forcing himself on...

Well duh. Can't undo the vile views expressed by other people Stripe. It was, what was tripping you up? Do or don't but don't start prattling on if you're not up to speed with stuff before weighing in.

To you perhaps but meh. Given the context then yeah, it was answered and that's why I brought it up as Derf doesn't consider it rape if a husband forces himself on his wife and is reduced to these silly scenarios to start with. At least you acknowledge he's an idiot for not recognizing rape...

Nope. I wouldn't want to make up some of the vile garbage being aired on this thread. I'd sooner it wouldn't even need to be addressed or Clete to even be involved but it's there more's the pity. Sure, Clete is hardly the most relaxed poster on this forum and I agree with him in single figure...

A lame one yes and I answered it accordingly. If the husband had forced sex on his wife on Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday night or whatever then he'd be guilty of rape. You can read, right? Derf doesn't consider it rape if a husband forces his wife into sex as it's apparently "something else", as...

Maybe you should consult the same dictionary for "violation".

Sure they do but if you don't then eh, not that surprising. Yeah, they have otherwise there wouldn't have been so much discussion regarding it and nor would Clete have felt obliged to air such disgust as well as exasperation. Some of the comments and views aired warrant such. Earth. You...

Spam would be a step up for you. That's not what I regard concerning rape at all.

You had my answer previous. If it can be proved that a husband has forced sex on his wife then there's only one verdict: Guilty of rape. Many get away with it unfortunately.

Just as well I ain't doing that then eh? You bring nothing but lame, boring tropes ad nauseam so hey ho.

Hmm, given that plenty actually have and do then you must be nobody. Er, yeah they have. Sorry you missed it but then you did get a bit late to the "party". Why do you think Clete was so exasperated? See ya!