Search results

My initial response to Derf after he'd presented his scenario: "Your scenario is lame as anything frankly. Do you honesty think that loving married couples have sex on set days or something? If the wife complained to a friend that her supposedly loving and cherishing husband had forced her...

If that's in reference to me then I know fine well I ain't thanks. Could hardly have been any clearer on this topic from the outset including your feeble scenario.

He presented a scenario that didn't specify whether force was involved or not. All that's "apparent" is that the wife wasn't happy with sex on Tuesday, it doesn't state why that is. As already explained - in what could hardly be clearer terms - if she was forced into it by her husband then he is...

Why hey there you...strange person. Good for you cos they're indefensible. Nope, sure didn't as any honest reading would establish and especially after having to walk you through it all and everything and no reason to edit my posts anyway. If you perpetuate the same asinine nonsense about...

I've responded to this once again with baby steps so the pair of you might be able to keep up. In the scenario presented it was too vague as to what the wife was unhappy about as outlined in my last. What isn't vague is your asinine nonsense about stating that I consider it rape if a woman has...

Sad thing is, some folk will believe it just as they bought into 'Q'...

Says it all doesn't it?

Heck, maybe this stuff does need to be spoonfed to the likes of you and Stripe. If the wife complains to her friend that she wasn't happy about Tuesdays "tryst" because she didn't feel like sex but her husband forced it on her anyway then her friend is right to call that rape. Given the...

There's some more irony but Stripes accusations as well as yours associated are unfounded. Addressed all ends up and all the posts are there. I sure ain't editing them.

Nope, not at all. I addressed his scenario, lame as it was and you're bringing nothing but the same tired stuff as per usual.

Of course it has a criminal. If a husband forces sex onto his wife he's a rapist - ergo a criminal. Your bizarre ramble about Hunter Biden has nothing to do with rape so no, I don't in any way come to anything resembling your warped conclusions at all.

Nope, no need as anyone without some childish little axe to grind will well be able to see.

Realistically they wouldn't as so difficult to prove sans security cams in the house and bedroom. My requirement: 100% proof of guilt. You, on the other hand don't consider it rape if a husband forces himself on his wife anyway so what do you care?

His scenario was lame as pointed out. Nope. A person should only be convicted of rape if they're guilty of it. Got the memo now?

No I don't, at all so that's a fail.

Already addressed and in context. "Silly" is being generous but you continue with your lame little tropes if ya want. Once again, spam would be a step up for you frankly.

He was answered honestly. Bored much?

To pick up on this asinine post of yours again, no, not at all and as much as you like to throw the term 'liar' about then you've absolutely made one of yourself. Nowhere, ever on here or anywhere else have I reduced rape to anything akin. I can sure understand women having regrets after sex...

Try under 'V'. There ya go!

Rape occurs numerous times within couples whether married or not and elsewhere. The percentage of rapists being caught and tried is as low as 6% unfortunately and within relationships it's difficult to prove as MaryContrary pointed out earlier. You're advocating that a husband forcing himself on...