Search results

Er, there was certainly implied force else why would the wife's friend encourage her to file rape charges as needed to be explained to you previously? The whole scenario is lame for sure but to say there's no force implicit is dumb. Rather, you misquoted me out of context and applied my...

Make ridiculous assertions? Quote people out of context? Quite a list really...

Nah, it wasn't. He lost, simple as, fact. Get over it already.

Thanks Mary. I'd hope that most of it's just foolishness but there's definitely an insidious aspect going on as well. Some folk actually think that there's no such thing as rape in a marriage so that shows the mentality of certain elements here, and elsewhere unfortunately.

Except it is if you'd actually noted the exchange. Note the parts highlighted in bold in each post. https://theologyonline.com/threads/answering-old-threads-thread.58428/post-1851072 "Which of course doesn't justify the notion that a spouse has the right to force themselves on their partner."...

Of course they didn't steal the election. Only loonies and conspiracy nuts buy into that rubbish. Trump was beaten, simple as that.

Of course not. You'd have to have reading comprehension problems or just be thick to even construe that from what I've wrote. Ho hum.

The invasion of Ukraine is all down to Putin and his despotic regime so that was bizarre. So's your nonsense about somehow preferring pedophiles grooming kids. I despise pedophilia and any atrocity of any stripe all ends up. Welcome back "Trump Gurl"...

Of course I won't, there's absolutely no need to and I stand by every word of it.

Only to those who don't know her and/or trolling.

It's not against the rules to address content of banned posters and Rusha *hates* free speech as much as I do, that is to say not at all.

Given that the choice was between Biden & another 4 years of Captain Bonespurs there was only one outcome that would be in the realms of sanity and thankfully was made. You sound rather familiar also...

There was no evidence of anything in the scenario so it was unclear as to whether the wife's complaint was because her husband had forced her into sex or not. If her friend considered her complaint to be rape then that actually does imply force but it can't be determined by that alone. I would...

If only some of you on the far right had any...

Of course not.

No, absolutely no need.

Only if it can be determined, otherwise no, not at all. Could hardly be clearer.

Nope, but no surprise that you persist with this loony tune stuff. I've answered this all ends up. The scenario was vague, nothing is specified as to why the woman is unhappy with sex on the Tuesday so it can't be determined if the husband forced her into sex or not. He would be guilty if so and...

What are you prattling on about now? That was my response to Derf after posting his lame scenario, that was it. How is that "inserting into someone else's ideas"?! Of course my responses are not Derf's ideas, duh...

Found who guilty? The hypothetical husband where it hasn't been determined in the scenario whether he's forced sex on his wife? You're all over the map, even more so than normal.