Yes, he does.
That ought to do it.
All he tries to do is defend the false teachings of John Nelson Darby.
All you do, is try to defend the false teachings of fallable men, such as Russell, Gentry, Josephus, Gentry.
There-that ought to do it.
Only someone with an agenda would make such a ludicrous claim.
Only someone with an agenda, and a loser, obsessed with meanie dispies, would make such ludicrous claims, "inventions," "theories," such as a flat earth, that Jesus Christ is not a man, that everyone is saved, murder,rape, stealing,....are not sins, as "the law was nailed to the cross," and the "appointed times...feasts," are errors in the bible,that signs are invisible, Russell's Roman army is the second coming invention/theory, the resurrection/redemption of the body is not physical,Preterists/AD 70 followers follow infallible men, including Christ rejector Josephus, Genesis 1:1 KJV ff is not literal, all churches are "man made," and thus not scriptural, the cross was "man made," and thus not scriptural, and is not literal, little arms boy.
The only people trying to overthrow the faith are you Darby followers.
The only people trying to overthrow the faith are you AD 70-ism/Preterist Flavius Josephesus, Russell, Hanegraaf, Gentry followers.
There-that ought to do it,little chin weasel.