Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Since you're here noguru, perhaps you could respond to Naz's post about how you feel about the regulation of homosexual behavior by governments and courts (for you Libertarians out there, that means criminalizing it).
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...&postcount=804

Unless it's done at a gay pride parade or a homosexual festival like the Folsom Street Fair, it's already illegal (the crime is called "lewd act in a public place").

Where do you think HIV/AIDS, gonorrhea, syphilis and a whole bunch of words that are sexually transmitted diseases common amongst homosexuals, words that I can't pronounce let alone spell are contracted at nog?

(I'll give you a hint, in the privacy of someone's sodomy chamber).

It should be illegal at a parade in public as well.

Why? They're just doing their own "thing".

I see that you didn't touch the latter part of my post regarding the diseases that disproportionately effect those that engage in homosexual behavior.

I hope that you realize that several of the posters that have sided with you on this issue in this thread will be dead from AIDS; murdered by a 'lover" (most likely an anonymous one that they met in a public restroom toilet stall or a bathhouse); will take their own life (suicide is high amongst those that partake in homosexual behavior because they know that they are living a lie and feel that they can't change); or will overdose on drugs or contract liver cancer from drinking too much.

Thoughts on that noguru? (Perhaps you should say your farewells to your fellow homosexualists now because one never knows when that death sentence is going to happen).
 

noguru

Well-known member
What was the name of the guy that fired his gun way too much and was excessively overarmed all the time?
 

GFR7

New member
a Christian Warrior said:
Call it what you want, but I call anyone that gets excited about such a thing a freak.
Then you are calling most males born after 1965 all freaks. I happen to be one of those rare ones who does not like "girl-on-girl action" at all , and I am told that means I am probably a closeted gay. :nono:
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Then you are calling most males born after 1965 all freaks. I happen to be one of those rare ones who does not like "girl-on-girl action" at all , and I am told that means I am probably a closeted gay. :nono:

He has a logic disconnect on the matter, well, several matters in fact...

It certainly doesn't appeal to all heterosexual men but his denial that it does to most is simply sticking his head in the sand, which is about the only thing he's any good at...

Those who call you a closeted gay are just ignorant.
 

noguru

Well-known member
Then you are calling most males born after 1965 all freaks. I happen to be one of those rare ones who does not like "girl-on-girl action" at all , and I am told that means I am probably a closeted gay. :nono:

:rotfl:

What bothers me is the guys who get overly excited about it. I start to think it is an overreaction meant to compensate for something.

I was born in 1965.
 

GFR7

New member
He has a logic disconnect on the matter, well, several matters in fact...

It certainly doesn't appeal to all heterosexual men but his denial that it does to most is simply sticking his head in the sand, which is about the only thing he's any good at...

Those who call you a closeted gay are just ignorant.
I kind of see what you mean. It is one thing if he finds it repulsive; I can respect that. But in strip clubs, prostitution, and soft and hardcore porn, it is majorly sought by the most macho of males. The more intellectual males are the ones who tend not to be moved by it. I've known guys who pretended to love it so as not to seem suspect.

Thnx for your kind words, I appreciate them. :cheers:
 

Heterodoxical

New member
Yes, ACW almost seems like a cyber caricature/parody of a wannabe police officer from a movie like "Police Academy".

:think:

Deputy Dog?

deputy-dog.jpg
 

noguru

Well-known member
I kind of see what you mean. It is one thing if he finds it repulsive; I can respect that. But in strip clubs, prostitution, and soft and hardcore porn, it is majorly sought by the most macho of males. The more intellectual males are the ones who tend not to be moved by it. I've known guys who pretended to love it so as not to seem suspect.

Thnx for your kind words, I appreciate them. :cheers:

I found it mildly interesting, but I was not nearly as exuberant about it as many male friends I knew in high school, and a few in college. The bourbon neo con crew my brother gravitates towards because of his profession seem to be the biggest consumers of female on female porn and live action among female strippers/escorts. Most of that is because they have the money to pay for all sorts of things, so that moves up the "luxury" list.
 

GFR7

New member
I found it mildly interesting, but I was not nearly as exuberant about it as many male friends I knew in high school, and a few in college. The bourbon neo con crew my brother gravitates towards because of his profession seem to be the biggest consumers of female on female porn and live action among prositutes.
Thanks for that. Interesting indeed, that neocons would be so interested :think:
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
For those of you following this 3 part thread outside of TOL: I've temporarily closed the thread because as seen, the boyz were getting a bit too worked up thinking about men in uniforms.

(I bet Art, Al, Jr./GFR7 and noguru are sitting around a campfire with a bunch of 12 year old boys teaching them the words to the Village People's "YMCA":

Young man, there's a place you can go.
I said, young man, when you're short on your dough.
You can stay there, and I'm sure you will find
Many ways to have a good time.
).

I'm trying to keep this thread from turning into a gossip thread (I know that's next to impossible when Auntie Art is posting), as it was designed from the beginning to be an educational tool.

I've been procrastinating on putting together a table of contents for part 3, so I'll keep the thread closed for a couple of days until I get 20 or so pages done.

When I return I'd like to return to the topic of homosexual violence, as that is the segment that I finished part 2 with and I would like to finish that segment before moving onto other informative topics.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hopefully the boyz have cooled down a bit from getting all worked up thinking about men in uniforms after this little "time out" .

Since Art is obviously going to return to the thread to talk about his newest obsession: lesbian sex, I thought I'd enclose some information about the diseases that are quite common amongst lesbians.

I certainly hope that words like "bacterial vaginosis", "chlamydia", " hepatitis B and C" and "genital herpes" won't ruin your fantasies Art.

http://www.womenshealth.gov/publications/our-publications/fact-sheet/lesbian-bisexual-health.html
http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/homosexuality/ho0075.html
 
Last edited:

Christian Liberty

Well-known member
Thanks for that. Interesting indeed, that neocons would be so interested :think:

Neocons aren't exactly known for moral conservatism. They just pretend to so as to get the social conservatives on board with the GOP. I don't believe for a second that Mike Huckabee or Rick Santorum actually cares about abortion or homosexuality, but they pretend to in order to get pro-life, pro-family conservatives voting for them.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Neocons aren't exactly known for moral conservatism. They just pretend to so as to get the social conservatives on board with the GOP. I don't believe for a second that Mike Huckabee or Rick Santorum actually cares about abortion or homosexuality, but they pretend to in order to get pro-life, pro-family conservatives voting for them.

Good point Jr., we need more 'social conservatives' like Ron Paul.

Calling homosexuality a sin is a "complex issue"


Since this interview, Ron Paul had voted to allow those that openly admit that they're practicing homosexuals into the US Armed Forces.

(You almost have to feel sorry for this decrepit fool).
 
Last edited:

Christian Liberty

Well-known member
Good point Jr., we need more 'social conservatives' like Ron Paul.

Calling homosexuality a sin is a "complex issue"


Since this interview, Ron Paul had voted to allow those that openly admit that they're practicing homosexuals into the US Armed Forces.

(You almost have to feel sorry for this decrepit fool).

Did I say Ron Paul was a social conservative? Did I say social conservatism was a good thing? Did I say that Ron was correct about what he says above? The answer to all of the above is "no."

What I said is that people who actually believe in social conservatism are manipulated by neocons who use them to get them to vote for war and nation-building. Which is a correct statement.

For what its worth, homosexuals serving in the US Armed Forces is completely appropriate considering what the US Armed Forces has been doing lately. And I'd celebrate if they kicked every Christian out as well. The US Armed Forces are not a force for good, and haven't been since the early 19th century.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top