Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

[aCultureWarrior]

There are a couple of posts that I wanted to respond to before I talk about another subject (how many proud and unrepentant homosexuals are against 'gay marriage').

While I don't want to get Jr. going on yet another one of his Libertarian rants, I looked into the new cult that he's currently admiring:

My views would be far closer to these guys

http://reformedlibertarian.com/articles/philosophy/libertarianism-and-the-christian/

and see that like all Libertarians, they adhere to the NAP (non aggression policy).

Reformed Libertarianism is still Libertarianism, just hidden underneath a different cowpie.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Looking back at an earlier post, I see that GayForReal7 didn't answer my question:

Quote:
Originally Posted by GFR7
From the libertarian purview, of course what you say is right. But as you yourself note, aCW would be the first to take our rights away
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4056817&postcount=2242

["Our rights"? Boy, if that wasn't a Freudian slip, nothing is].

I've asked this question many times before and will do it again:

Where does this supposed "right" to buggerize someone come from?

 

[GFR7]

Looking back at an earlier post, I see that GayForReal7 didn't answer my question:

Quote:
Originally Posted by GFR7
From the libertarian purview, of course what you say is right. But as you yourself note, aCW would be the first to take our rights away

["Our rights"? Boy, if that wasn't a Freudian slip, nothing is].

I've asked this question many times before and will do it again:

Where does this supposed "right" to buggerize someone come from?

How can it be a Freudian slip, when there is no secret knowledge that I am buggering, to let slip?

I meant you would take liberty away from us because you INSIST against all evidence that I, Arthur, CL, SammyT (gone but not forgotten), Wizard of Oz, are all gay--- even when you see Granite, PureX, Traci, and many others attacking me for my "rampant homophobia". So YES, you would in fact take our rights away. No Freudian slip there, and I have spoken openly at all times (remember my "crush" on LaBarbera? Freudian-slippers would have hidden that )
CLOSE BUT NO FREUDIAN CIGAR, KENTUCKY! :cigar:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

How can it be a Freudian slip, when there is no secret knowledge that I am buggering, to let slip?

I meant you would take liberty away from us because you INSIST against all evidence that I, Arthur, CL, SammyT (gone but not forgotten), Wizard of Oz, are all gay--- even when you see Granite, PureX, Traci, and many others attacking me for my "rampant homophobia". So YES, you would in fact take our rights away. No Freudian slip there, and I have spoken openly at all times (remember my "crush" on LaBarbera? Freudian-slippers would have hidden that )
CLOSE BUT NO FREUDIAN CIGAR, KENTUCKY! :cigar:

As much as I'd like to believe your above rant, when you stated that those of us that want to return to having decent laws and cultural mores' (Scott Lively, Matt Barber, Bryan Fischer, Peter LaBarbera, Brian Camenker, and millions of other) should be "Nuremberged", and that recriminalizing homosexuality amounts to that, you once again gave yourself away.

Quote: Orginally posted by GFR7

...But it is interesting, the thought of aCW being Nuremberged Of course, this is what he is looking to do to gays when his ReCrim kicks in...
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4056842&postcount=2245

Once again: Where do these supposed rights to buggerize come from?

 

[GFR7]

As much as I'd like to believe your above rant, when you stated that those of us that want to return to having decent laws and cultural mores' (Scott Lively, Matt Barber, Bryan Fischer, Peter LaBarbera, Brian Camenker, and millions of other) should be "Nuremberged", and that recriminalizing homosexuality amounts to that, you once again gave yourself away.

Quote: Orginally posted by GFR7

...But it is interesting, the thought of aCW being Nuremberged Of course, this is what he is looking to do to gays when his ReCrim kicks in...
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4056842&postcount=2245

Once again: Where do these supposed rights to buggerize come from?

I said only that I would like to see YOU Nuremberged -
NOT LaBarbera, Lively, Barber et al - because I have grown to despise you!

OMG, you are SOOOOOO stupid!!!

 

[GFR7]

1. My own and Christian Liberty's laissez-faire attitude does NOT mean we find a constitutional right to sodomy~ we do not find such!

2. As for legislation, we do not believe gay marriage should be legal!

 

[aCultureWarrior]

1. My own and Christian Liberty's laissez-faire attitude does NOT mean we find a constitutional right to sodomy~ we do not find such!

2. As for legislation, we do not believe gay marriage should be legal!

Where does this supposed right to buggerize come from if not the Constitution? (pssst, laissez-faire has nothing to do with homosexuality, it's an economic theory).
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/laissez-faire

As I will reveal shortly, there are organized groups of homosexuals that for various reasons, don't want homosexuals to 'marry'.

My thanks to TOL Moderator Delmar for removing pornography from GayForReal7's post.

Please, let's keep that filth in your gay bathhouses and bars, it's not needed here.

 

[Christian Liberty]

1. My own and Christian Liberty's laissez-faire attitude does NOT mean we find a constitutional right to sodomy~ we do not find such!

Constitutionally speaking, the states can decide their own laws on these matters.

2. As for legislation, we do not believe gay marriage should be legal!

Actually, I don't think gay marriage should be illegal. I don't think marriage should be officially recognized by the State though. I don't want gay marriages being done in my church and I would not participate in/attend a gay wedding or a church that did gay weddings.

Where does this supposed right to buggerize come from if not the Constitution? (pssst, laissez-faire has nothing to do with homosexuality, it's an economic theory).
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/laissez-faire

As I will reveal shortly, there are organized groups of homosexuals that for various reasons, don't want homosexuals to 'marry'.

My thanks to TOL Moderator Delmar for removing pornography from GayForReal7's post.

Please, let's keep that filth in your gay bathhouses and bars, it's not needed here.

laissez-faire is an economic theory, but its logical implication is that all governmental functions can also be provided by the free market, and that a hands off approach should be implemented toward such actions as homosexuality.

 

[GFR7]

Where does this supposed right to buggerize come from if not the Constitution? (pssst, laissez-faire has nothing to do with homosexuality, it's an economic theory).
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/laissez-faire

As I will reveal shortly, there are organized groups of homosexuals that for various reasons, don't want homosexuals to 'marry'.

My thanks to TOL Moderator Delmar for removing pornography from GayForReal7's post.

Please, let's keep that filth in your gay bathhouses and bars, it's not needed here.

PPPsssst , Turnip-Head from Kentucky: The term 'laissez-faire' among intellectuals simply means "live and let live/leave it alone" and can be extended and applied to many areas, you dunce, you.

lais·sez-faire
ˌlesā ˈfe(ə)r,ˌlezā
noun
a policy or attitude of letting things take their own course, without interfering.

And because Delmar is an Administrator , I have respect for him and would not presume to argue with anything he deems fit -

but as for YOU, who spews names like "fag" and worse at various and sundry - you call one of the century's finest lyrical artists and globally respected musical geniuses pornography fit for a bath house????? But then I guess you would.

Here is a subdued "portrait of the artist as a young man":

 

[Christian Liberty]

WRT: The "nuremberg" bit, I never suggested that anyone should be nurmeberged for suggesting certain policies, moral or otherwise. I said that if you really were a former cop, you inevitably violated someone else's rights, and could face nuremberg for that.

 

[GFR7]

WRT: The "nuremberg" bit, I never suggested that anyone should be nurmeberged for suggesting certain policies, moral or otherwise. I said that if you really were a former cop, you inevitably violated someone else's rights, and could face nuremberg for that.

And that is what I was responding to, in terms of him, and him alone. He has made it clear that he needs NO evidence to condemn people, so I can only imagine the havoc he wreaked in law enforcement.

 

[Caledvwlch]

And that is what I was responding to, in terms of him, and him alone. He has made it clear that he needs NO evidence to condemn people, so I can only imagine the havoc he wreaked in law enforcement.

What a nightmare! Now as a aCW-labeled "defender of sodomy," how will I be executed?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Constitutionally speaking, the states can decide their own laws on these matters.

So the devoutly Christian men that drafted and signed the Constitution, the same men who made homosexuality a felony in every State, one of whom thought that homosexuals should be castrated, thought that buggery was a "states rights issue"?

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/03/what-the-founders-believed-about-homosexuality/

 

[Caledvwlch]

So the devoutly Christian men that drafted and signed the Constitution...

Which ones were those? And no citations from David Barton, or you have to go sit in the corner.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Which ones were those? And no citations from David Barton, or you have to go sit in the corner.

Do your own homework.

 

[GFR7]

What a nightmare! Now as a aCW-labeled "defender of sodomy," how will I be executed?

That remains to be seen. But it won't be pretty, I'm sure. :think:

 

[Caledvwlch]

That remains to be seen. But it won't be pretty, I'm sure. :think:

I'm hoping for something they wouldn't even do on Game of Thrones.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

What a nightmare! Now as a aCW-labeled "defender of sodomy," how will I be executed?

As it been shown throughout this 3 part thread, those who engage in homosexual behavior disproportionately die from various sexually transmitted diseases, are murdered by an anonymous 'lover', overdose from drugs, or commit suicide because they can't continue to live the lie that they're living.

While recriminalizing homosexuality will help lost souls like you through various forms of therapy, I'm afraid that until that happens, you and others will continue to write your own death warrant.

 

[Caledvwlch]

As it been shown throughout this 3 part thread, those who engage in homosexual behavior disproportionately die from various sexually transmitted diseases, are murdered by an anonymous 'lover', overdose from drugs, or commit suicide because they can't continue to live the lie that they're living.

While recriminalizing homosexuality will help lost souls like you through various forms of therapy, I'm afraid that until that happens, you and others will continue to write your own death warrant.

Okay, then why re-criminalize if you're just going to go with therapy? Come on! Where's your Old Testement ire? Let he who is without brains cast the first stone and all of that.

And what, exactly, are you insinuating with the whole "lost souls like you" business?

 

[GFR7]

Okay, then why re-criminalize if you're just going to go with therapy? Come on! Where's your Old Testement ire? Let he who is without brains cast the first stone and all of that.

And what, exactly, are you insinuating with the whole "lost souls like you" business?

Plain and simple, he is saying you're gay, and that with all your sodomy, you will likely get HIV (he says same of me, and several other posters who would not toe the party line). Get used to it. :nono: