70AD
ECT "Things that are different" included Gentiles
- Thread starter heir
- Start date
70AD
Not at the same time.
IOW, there was never two different gospels preached in the NC.
What was preached in the OC, was not preached in the NC, and vice versa.
Irrelevant. Go ahead and assert that the gospel of the kingdom, which the 12, including Judas, preached for almost 3 years, is equivalent to the gospel of 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV. Go ahead.
Watch the evasion, side stepping, Darby spam....Watch....
They were born under the OC. Jesus was born under the OC.
In addition to the 12 preaching that Jesus was the Christ, both Jesus and the 12 proclaimed the good news of the kingdom:
(Luke 16:16) "The Law and the Prophets were proclaimed until John. Since that time, the good news of the kingdom of God is being preached, and everyone is forcing their way into it.
As we see above, the Law and Prophets was no longer preached after John the Baptist.
Now the punk is changing his "argument." From "no multiple gospels" to "no multiple gospels at the same time."
That is slick, Craigie...Real slick.....And you cry we are confused?
You little Preterist fraud, hypocrite, clown.
I am picking you apart, and TOL is witnessing your being bloodied.
I never said it was equivalent.
I said there was not two different gospels preached after the cross in the NC.
Neither Jesus, Peter, or anyone else preached the NC before the cross because it hadn't been implemented yet. However, Jesus gave parables that hinted as to what the NC was going to be.
I'm not changing my argument. I've always made it clear that understanding the difference in the covenants is why you Darby Followers are so confused.
"As we see above, the Law and Prophets was no longer preached after John the Baptist."
As we can see, you spammed again, you punk, as you misinterpreted that verse. You got that interpretation from Russell. You made it up.
You evade the question as usual, side stepping punk. I asked:
Who told the 12 to be under the OC?
Does "under" mean that they were to keep the law? Yes, or no? Who kept the law, and why? Was the law part of the OC? Who taught them to be under the OC? Chapter, verse. Put away your Preterist stack of commentaries, punk-stand on your own 2 feet, instead of scrambling to:
View attachment 25684
Caught, in another lie-you changed your argument, from:
to:
No, you lied, and once again, you little demon possessed punk, rely on your "Darby" spam, as your "response:"
Caught, in another lie-you changed your argument, from:
to:
So, the OC ended in AD 70? Did the OC include the law, moron?
Who taught the 12 to be under the OC?
Were the feasts, such as Pentecost, part of the law?
AMEN!
Ta-da!
Nice to see steko's fellow Darby Follower, and cheerleader checking in.
The OC included the law.
HINT:
(Heb 8:13) By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear.
At the time Hebrews was written, the OC was "outdated" and "obsolete".
yep
... correct you with scripture.