Right Divider
Body part
I'll willing to follow scripture wherever it leads.
ECT "Things that are different" included Gentiles
- Thread starter heir
- Start date
dodge
New member
lol, if that was true you would have never bit into the lies of MAD.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Dodgeism is in error.
Right Divider
Body part
You are neither humorous nor intellectually honest.
You constantly lie about what MAD teaches.
You beat up your little straw-man and feel so proud of yourself.
No one said you have ended up at rank heresy.
And the fact is that after Acts 7, both Unbelieving Israel and lost Gentiles had been concluded "under sin" or "heathen."
Yours is an artificial distinction.
It seems your TOL majority has already decided otherwise:chuckle:
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Perhaps Acts 7 is an artificial "fall of Israel".
Right Divider
Body part
I don't try to force my meaning onto it. I'm fine with the fact that the RISEN LORD Jesus Christ called Paul and gave him new revelation and that began in Acts 9. That there was a change going on throughout the book of Acts is also self evident.
Like when Luke switched from accompanying the twelve and began accompanying Paul and those others with Paul. http://theologyonline.com/entry.php?3557-Luke-started-accompanying-Paul-beginning-in-Acts-16
There is the unofficial "handbook" bro.
Where the Acts 9 Position has always approached attempting to solve such questions from is the "handbook."
Other than whatever the three major schools or so within Mid-Acts might each be setting forth as some sort of a loose set of Bible Study PRINCIPLES - the whole issue boils down to where one approaches attempting to solve for one question or another from.
Obviously, Acts 9 does not approach attempting to solve for one question or another in the same way Acts 28 does.
Neither does knowingly and or unknowingly fusing both approaches into a Hybrid of both.
Those are three approaches.
Not one. Not two.
You and I hold different understandings based on one or the other of those.
Whether we are aware of it, or not.
Problem is, you and yours appear to take pointing this out as some sort of a personal thing.
It is not.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
What are the basics of Acts 9/MAD?
I doubt you attempt to force one thing into another.
At least not intentionally.
I have found myself having done just that unintentionally.
Because Bible Study is much like when one takes in a room mate.
Neither always knows what rules each actually lives by - until it is accidentally violated, lol.
Such is also often the case with Bible Study.
As a result, I greatly suspect that if there were an "Official Mid-Acts Bible Study Handbook" the last page would read "...to be continued and further refined, til the Lord returns..."
Right Divider
Body part
There are enough people on TOL throwing out their wild speculations. How about you just give some facts?
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
In order to determine a "hybrid", there must be a few basics.
lol - you are hopeless.
You just watch how some others on TOL will have understood exactly what I said in that post.
Get rid of that fool chip on your shoulder already.
Right Divider
Body part
Dude, you're the one with the chip. You're always on the offensive.
I just asked for some facts. It ain't that hard.
Shawn has more than aptly pointed out the same 15 "basics" pointing to your hybrid of where Acts 9 looks at things from with where Acts 28 does, that I also see you off in (and then some, as he only pointed out 15 of them).
You skirted dealing with even one of those.
https://forwhatsaiththescriptures.wordpress.com/2015/10/25/acts-9-28-hybrid-theology/
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
I want you to tell me what makes someone MAD, and what makes a hybrid.
15 Facts o touchy one
https://forwhatsaiththescriptures.wordpress.com/2015/10/25/acts-9-28-hybrid-theology/
Let me know if you need more, as he only touched on 15 of them :chuckle:
Quit skirting those 15 points :chuckle: