The Trinity

The Trinity


  • Total voters
    121

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
The "knowledge" of man.

One is singular; as in united; though many, making up the whole.

You know; like the branches make up the vine though they be different in shape and direction?

The english word "one," to be sure.

But I'm not talking about the English word for "one." I'm talking about the three different Hebrew words for "one."

Please pay attention to the subject matter at hand.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Do you really think it was not the Will of GOD to allow such?

Pops, you're sounding more and more like an Arminian...

No, God did not "allow" Abram to take Hagar just like he doesn't "allow" a man to rape a woman or "allow" a pedophile to molest a child, nor did he will for it to happen, and especially not by any "decree" as Calvinists teach.

No, Abraham simply did not wait upon God's timing like he should have.
 

popsthebuilder

New member
Three persons in One God.

It's only your PRIDE that keeps you from admitting no one here claims there are three Gods.

You know that, but you keep repeating the same old LIE. Which makes you a LIAR.



It's only your PRIDE that keeps you running off at the mouth instead of opening an ear. :nono:
Of course none of you would out right admit that three separate persons or personalities or personas really equates to three separate people. Or that three persons equals 300% person, and no room for God unless we are calling God 400% being. Illogical is great because it stands out for what it is. The fact of the matter is that the word person is a form of equating GOD to a person. Adding two more persons only makes it more atrocious. GOD is Spirit; and we are specifically and repeatedly told not to liken GOD to any formed thing.

I am in no way refuting the Spirit of the man Jesus. Man is formed, created, begotten; even if first to be so. As such, that man is not coeternal with the One Creator GOD; though His Spirit that fills HIS vessel and Temple is wholly of GOD.
 

popsthebuilder

New member
First you have to be smarter than any particular word on a page.

Example.....

Ephesians 5:31 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.​
Wow.... It means the two are one in spirit showing such through the deeds of their flesh in singular spiritual accord in love; for the sake of one another.

I
 

popsthebuilder

New member
The english word "one," to be sure.

But I'm not talking about the English word for "one." I'm talking about the three different Hebrew words for "one."

Please pay attention to the subject matter at hand.
I couldn't care how many words mean one; they still all lead to the same conclusion; 1....not 3.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Wow.... It means the two are one in spirit showing such through the deeds of their flesh in singular spiritual accord in love; for the sake of one another.

I
Again, you miss the point both I and GD are making, and that is that there is more than one definition of the word "one" used in the Bible other than describing a singular entity.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
I couldn't care how many words mean one; they still all lead to the same conclusion; 1....not 3.
You're missing the point. Golly, you people are dense.

My point is not that there are multiple words that mean one. My point is that the word used to describe God is not "one of singularity," as you and GT keep insisting, but that the word used means "one of plurality."
 

popsthebuilder

New member
Pops, you're sounding more and more like an Arminian...

No, God did not "allow" Abram to take Hagar just like he doesn't "allow" a man to rape a woman or "allow" a pedophile to molest a child, nor did he will for it to happen, and especially not by any "decree" as Calvinists teach.

No, Abraham simply did not wait upon God's timing like he should have.
Yet the act happened; did it not? Surely if GOD did not allow it, then it wouldn't have happened.

That is in no way whatsoever saying that the sin of man(though forgiven) is ever the will of GOD.
 

glorydaz

Well-known member
If you had then you wouldn't have acted like you hadn't.

Unless you are being deceitful.

Oh, those are my two options because that's all you are able to see. :chuckle:

No, you give several texts with multiple verses that are both broad and wide....as if you've actually made an argument. There are probably twenty arguments (more even) in that group....including scolding which is one of your favorite things.

Windmills
 

popsthebuilder

New member
Gt is saying you have to work to earn one's salvation. Paul refutes that completely. GT uses James 2:24 because it supports her argument, but only because it's ripped out of the context of James 1:1.
I am well aware that St. Paul preaches effectual faith though man would have us think the dead sort was spoken of and expounded upon.

Funny thing, context; more often than not, it spans actual chapters, showing the numeric divisions and even divisions of the chapters to be additions and needlessly divisive and too distractng from the actual content of the subject matter.
 

popsthebuilder

New member
You're missing the point. Golly, you people are dense.

My point is not that there are multiple words that mean one. My point is that the word used to describe God is not "one of singularity," as you and GT keep insisting, but that the word used means "one of plurality."
And my point is that what you say is polytheistic in its very root and source. Please check.

Not to mention an oxymoron.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Yet the act happened; did it not? Surely if GOD did not allow it, then it wouldn't have happened.

By saying "allow," you (perhaps unintentionally) make it seem like God is ok with people going against His will. That is not the case at all. I suggest you stop using the word "allow" to refer to something that happened. Because I assure you, God did not "allow" it to happen, it simply happened.

That is in no way whatsoever saying that the sin of man(though forgiven) is ever the will of GOD.

Except that is exactly what it says, especially to any unbelievers reading this thread. Words and ideas have consequences, Pops. You need to be mindful of that.
 
Top