:think: It seemed to have had to have been one or the other. Some, as you probably can imagine, ask, but don't really want an answer, just giving vindictives from their staunch positions. It winds up just being fighting on a triune board. I have to wonder if they are just contentious and not really here for any other reason. I do, unfortunately, question their spirituality in our Lord Jesus Christ because of it. I'm pleased you are the other guy from that and assumed you were not of the former. I've seen you treat discussion as if truth is more important than posturizing our respective beliefs. :e4e:
But Panentheism,is. Ephesians 4:6 Colossians 1:17
Not Pantheism, Panentheism.
I think that is fair for expectation. If you are ever worried about it, put {spoiler] in front of the verses listed and [/spoiler} after replacing { and } for [ and ].
As I said, I like you. Demeanor is the difference between a challenge to something as well as answering questions. I think I was more addressing the material between us, if you will. However, as I've said, I have liked you from the day you arrived on TOL. However that plays out, I believe our best gift to each other is to speak what we know to be true and examine ourselves after to be sure what we believe is true, holds up. For me, that is the greatest gift to one another on TOL. It helps us be made and molded by scriptures (and the reason I'm glad for your scriptures in length). -Lon
I disagree. I believe that it IS mental gymnastics. Moments before, John 10:33 It was CLEAR to the Pharisees that Jesus claimed to be God. Mental gymnastics, as far as I understand scripture, is missing that. Somehow, very clearly, Jesus communicated He was God. Imho, you missed it. John 14:7
Modalism. As I've said, I agree with about half of what an Arian says, about half of what a modalist says. Triune could be partly understood as being "1/2 Unitarian/Modal -ism."
:nono: Which is why I only agree with about half of what you believe. John 1:3 1 Timothy 1:3 then 1 John 4:2 "c
ame in the flesh." Words mean something. If we don't acknowledge those words, we are no longer being molded by scripture, but molding scripture to OUR expectations. There is NO WAY I could be triune if scripture didn't mold me as such. It is NOT intuitive. God isn't a man nor does He think like a man. Numbers 23:19
-- Thank you, btw, for looking up and reading and studying scriptures with me on all this, of course it should not be something to 'thank' because it is the soul of a man who belongs to God, to know his/her God, but yet, it is refreshing to see a love for Him and His scriptures! Thus, I thank you for refreshing my soul with such. In Him.
Did you ever contemplate that the Lord Jesus Christ has authority over that Spirit? John 20:22
When it comes to the Lord Jesus Christ, if we 'assume' we are wrong. He was/is unique. Imho, this is speculative surmising.
We are wholly in disagreement. I am Trinitarian because it is the ONLY position that makes scriptural sense. Like I said, scripturally, I agree with about half of your scriptural ideas, specifically, because they are scriptural. The problem is, I/we see half of what you believe as
scripturally untenable. All any other would have to do, is PROVE from scripture we Trinitarians are wrong. To date? :nono: Even you are on about 'tradition.' It is a scapegoat, a rabbit trail, a nothing. I don't care about tradition OTHER than if it aligns with scripture. "Tradition" then, is a strawman and really a waste of time and breath. SHOW scripture and see if someone agrees. You already know where we don't in this thread. Any discussion BUT scripture is a red-herring and a waste of time in most cases (clarification discussion is often helpful).
I gave scriptures to contemplate otherwise. see John 16:28 among many others. To me, it does not look scripturally tenable that the Lord Jesus Christ is a 'created' being. His flesh was made, but to think the Creator is a creature is never expressed. Why you'd believe it, then, MUST be extra-biblical extrapolation. There is no other possibility. No scripture says the Lord Jesus Christ was created. I further believe the ONLY place you could have gained such an idea is from a heretic. Imho, it CAN'T come from scripture.
I appreciate the attempt!
Quick help tutorial of the way "I" do it:
I highlight sentences I want to respond to and hit the "Quote" button above (the dialogue balloon
I delete any sentence I don't want to respond to.
Next, I respond between the quote marks.
Finally, I copy the first quote:
Lon;# and paste it over all of the [QUOTE}'s :e4e: -Lon[/QUOTE said:
I must be quick, and may not be afforded the time to respond fully until next weekend.
I will respond to the things we seem to be wholly opposite on as bluntly as possible.
I agree wholly about self examination; be it active or retrospective. Beautiful, most significant point.
One with GOD is a spiritual state. An utter negation of self and the wants of self. If one sets aside their wants or themselves from all processes of thought and action then they are left focusing on the Spirit and the conscience. Doing such could be said to be at One with God. All is of GOD, and the potential to realize such lies within each of us. How much more so would this potential have been present for the Christ of GOD; the firstborn? Which, by the way, brings me to another point? Born, begotten, is to be formed. You say Jesus was the exception, but scripture says flatly that He is the firstborn; which is indeed the first to be formed, which too is per scripture as as all was formed by GOD through his Word which too emanated from GOD, making it not literally synonymous with the literal utter fullness of GOD, let alone while manifest in the flesh.
I see people who believe that Jesus was literally the utter fullness of GOD while temporal man. One question comes to mind that none have ever answered except to say because GOD loves us, which, though true; is no answer to the actual question. I really must go for now, but the question.... please answer it; and know I mean no disrespect to GOD or Lord.
Why would GOD send GOD to be a blood sacrifice to GOD?
how is that related to saving grace or the gospel?