The Second biggest evidence of the Flood. Fossils

[justatruthseeker]

Again, that has nothing to do with the creation of the planets and moons.

Says who, you?

All of that water came from the earth.

No sorry, your confusing comets which came from the earth as being equal to oceans worth of water on other planets….

 

[Right Divider]

Says who, you?

Everyone but you.

No sorry, your confusing comets which came from the earth as being equal to oceans worth of water on other planets….

Earth is the only planet with vast amounts of water.

 

[justatruthseeker]

You don't seem to have understood the problem, then.

I recommend these shows:

https://kgov.com/bel/20210709 (Part 1)
https://kgov.com/bel/20210723 (Part 2)
https://kgov.com/one-way-speed-of-light-measurement-proposal (Part 3)

Yah they always propose how to do it but never manage to actually measure it’s one way speed or it wouldn’t be up for debate…

Non-sequitur.

Says who you?

Based on what the actual problem is, explained above, all it would take is to devise an experiment that can show the one-way speed of light.

I’d suggest you get busy…. No one’s done it yet…

But not blind belief. Belief based on evidence, i.e. faith.

What evidence is there that the one way speed of light is the same or different? None either way, so all is based on blind belief….

Because physics is weird sometimes, and certain physical phenomena can accelerate decay rates of unstable elements.

They can accelerate and slow all elements, stable or not…. You don’t think under acceleration or changes in gravity it’s just the atoms in the clock that is affected do you?

I must have missed it, sorry.

You're going to have to explain what you mean by "Relativity," because depending on your answer, it may have absolutely no relevance to "God stretched out the Heavens."

And I can guarantee you that decay rates being faster in the past DEFINITELY has nothing to do with Relativity, in any case.

You would be wrong since Relativity is why clocks (decay rates) and twins, age slower during increases in velocity. So imagine the change in decay rates when God “stretched out the heavens “…..

And yet, sometimes, He does things differently. So?

And sometimes he doesn’t. So?

I'm not sure where you got this information, but you might want to check your sources.

Some species share some genetic code, in large and small amounts, but certainly not all life.

Every living thing on this planet shares the same 4 basic genetic bases. CTAG. No matter what combinations they exist in. There exist none other.

Non-sequitur.

Says who, you?

No, He didn't. Most life on earth is genetically distinct, with some creatures having parts (not all) of their genetic code shared for similar functions

All from the exact same 4 bases. Just as everything in the universe is made from the same 3 base atomic substructures (electron, neutron, protron).

Doesn't mean they were all created the same. In fact, it doesn't even mean that they were created with water at all to begin with.

Doesn’t mean they weren’t. According to HTP earth only lost about 4% of its mass, so all that oceans of water on moons and planets couldn’t have came from the earth along with all the comets, asteroids and TNO’s. Your pushing unfounded dogma for no reason.

And?

And…. See above. 4% of earths mass to account for the angular momentum change from 360 days to 365+ days per year would not allow all the asteroids, comets and TNO’s plus oceans worth of water on planets and moons….

 

[justatruthseeker]

Everyone but you.

Earth is the only planet with vast amounts of water.

Because you’ve been to them all?

We might agree to vast amounts of “liquid” water… on its surface….

“Enceladus orbits near the rings of Saturn. In fact, watery eruptions from Enceladus' ice geysers comprise the F-Ring of the gas giant—the moon spews 1,000 tons of water into space every hour.”

“Ganymede is the largest moon in our solar system, bigger than even the planet Mercury. Astronomers had long suspected that an ocean lies beneath the 100-mile-thick ice crust at the surface, and in a new study, aurorae activity suggest that the ocean is somewhat warm and definitely salty.”

“Ceres has been known since 1801, but its small size has made it difficult to study. Until recently, it was believed to be a relatively rocky body. But recent observations from and evidence from the spacecraft, which just arrived there, have raised an intriguing possibility: that Ceres is less a ball of rock and more a watery dwarf planet with an icy mantle and a slushy ocean below.”

Need I keep going? Sorry but there’s just too much water out there to believe the outdated dogma that only earth has water….

 

[Right Divider]

And…. See above. 4% of earths mass to account for the angular momentum change from 360 days to 365+ days per year would not allow all the asteroids, comets and TNO’s plus oceans worth of water on planets and moons….

The increased rotational speed of the earth was not caused by loss of mass. It was caused by compression of the mass of the planet. According to Dr. Brown the earth shrunk by about 180 miles in diameter.

 

[Right Divider]

Because you’ve been to them all?

That is hilarious since YOU claimed knowledge of them. There are no vast oceans of water except on earth.

We might agree to vast amounts of “liquid” water… on its surface….

You have knowledge of vast oceans under the surface of the planets? Do tell. Have you contacted NASA to let them know?

“Enceladus orbits near the rings of Saturn. In fact, watery eruptions from Enceladus' ice geysers comprise the F-Ring of the gas giant—the moon spews 1,000 tons of water into space every hour.”

Water that came from earth. Are you unaware that many objects in the solar system are debris from the bursting of the great deep?

“Ganymede is the largest moon in our solar system, bigger than even the planet Mercury. Astronomers had long suspected that an ocean lies beneath the 100-mile-thick ice crust at the surface, and in a new study, aurorae activity suggest that the ocean is somewhat warm and definitely salty.”

Again, from earth.

“Ceres has been known since 1801, but its small size has made it difficult to study. Until recently, it was believed to be a relatively rocky body. But recent observations from and evidence from the spacecraft, which just arrived there, have raised an intriguing possibility: that Ceres is less a ball of rock and more a watery dwarf planet with an icy mantle and a slushy ocean below.”

From earth. The entire asteroid belt is material from the earth.

Need I keep going? Sorry but there’s just too much water out there to believe the outdated dogma that only earth has water….

Yes, keep going and I'll keep telling you that all of that stuff is from the earth.

 

[justatruthseeker]

The increase rotational speed of the earth was not caused by loss of mass. It was caused by compression of the mass of the planet. According to Dr. Brown the earth shrunk by about 180 miles in diameter.

Had its mass remained constant the loss of diameter and compression would have increased the rotation beyound the 360 to 365 day rotation increase. The loss of mass is why it only increased 5 days not more….

 

[justatruthseeker]

That is hilarious since YOU claimed knowledge of them. There are no vast oceans of water except on earth.

Right, that’s why 1,000 tons per hour is spewing into space and one has 100 miles of ice….

You have knowledge of vast oceans under the surface of the planets? Do tell. Have you contacted NASA to let them know?

They already know, but then that’s who the quotes came from, so why contact them about what they already know…

Water that came from earth. Are you unaware that many objects in the solar system are debris from the bursting of the great deep?

If you think 100 miles of ice came from earth when our oceans are only two miles there’s no hope for a scientific discussion in this thread….

Again, from earth.

From earth. The entire asteroid belt is material from the earth.

Agreed… but what’s that got to do with moons with 100 miles of ice????

Yes, keep going and I'll keep telling you that all of that stuff is from the earth.

And you’ll keep deluding yourself if you think 100 miles of ice came from the earth…. Just don’t expect everyone to be so deluded…

 

[Right Divider]

Had its mass remained constant the loss of diameter and compression would have increased the rotation beyound the 360 to 365 day rotation increase. The loss of mass is why it only increased 5 days not more….

Sounds reasonable.

 

[Right Divider]

Right, that’s why 1,000 tons per hour is spewing into space and one has 100 miles of ice….

They already know, but then that’s who the quotes came from, so why contact them about what they already know…

If you think 100 miles of ice came from earth when our oceans are only two miles there’s no hope for a scientific discussion in this thread….

Agreed… but what’s that got to do with moons with 100 miles of ice????

And you’ll keep deluding yourself if you think 100 miles of ice came from the earth…. Just don’t expect everyone to be so deluded…

Where are getting this supposed 100 miles of ice from? Sounds bogus from the start.

 

[justatruthseeker]

Where are getting this supposed 100 miles of ice from? Sounds bogus from the start.

“Ganymede is the largest moon in our solar system, bigger than even the planet Mercury. Astronomers had long suspected that an ocean lies beneath the 100-mile-thick ice crust at the surface, and in a new study, aurorae activity suggest that the ocean is somewhat warm and definitely salty.”

https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/a14555/water-worlds-in-our-solar-system/

From NASA and the ESA

 

[Right Divider]

“Ganymede is the largest moon in our solar system, bigger than even the planet Mercury. Astronomers had long suspected that an ocean lies beneath the 100-mile-thick ice crust at the surface, and in a new study, aurorae activity suggest that the ocean is somewhat warm and definitely salty.”

https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/a14555/water-worlds-in-our-solar-system/

From NASA and the ESA

From the article in the second link:

The largest moon in our solar system may be hiding an ocean, according to NASA and ESA's Hubble team. So you can add Jupiter's Ganymede to Europa, Enceladus, and others on the ever-growing list of bodies in our solar system that might be home to water and good candidates for finding extraterrestrial life.

The researchers here focused in on an aurora phenomenon on the surface of Ganymede, one of the four large Galilean moons of Jupiter. Scientists had long suspected a subterranean ocean on Ganymede, the aurora displayed signs of a large amount of salt water under the surface of the moon—the first solid evidence of the ocean. The team spotted the phenomenon by imaging the moon in the ultraviolet spectrum.

I'm not convinced that this is such "solid evidence".

Note that this article is common in its anti-Biblical approach to the creation of the solar system and life on earth.

 

[Right Divider]

@justatruthseeker Here's another "good one".

The ocean would be 95 miles below the crust of Ganymede and reach depths of 60 miles. A saltwater ocean likely creates a secondary magnetic field on the moon, helping shelter it from some of the harsher effects of Jupiter's radiation and improving the chances for life.

It's all about "finding life" that has "evolved" on other planets/moons, since life "evolved" on earth. You know... it could have happened all over the universe... etc. etc. etc.

P.S.

Looks like we're adding Ganymede to the list of potentially habitable worlds.

 

[justatruthseeker]

From the article in the second link:

I'm not convinced that this is such "solid evidence".

Note that this article is common in its anti-Biblical approach to the creation of the solar system and life on earth.

Aren’t they all? You just got to weed out the data from the propaganda….

 

[justatruthseeker]

@justatruthseeker Here's another "good one".

It's all about "finding life" that has "evolved" on other planets/moons, since life "evolved" on earth. You know... it could have happened all over the universe... etc. etc. etc.

P.S.

Yes, you got to learn to weed out the standard evolutionary propaganda. Did you think it wouldn’t be included in any paper by the mainstream propagandists????

 

[Right Divider]

Yes, you got to learn to weed out the standard evolutionary propaganda. Did you think it wouldn’t be included in any paper by the mainstream propagandists????

Aren’t they all? You just got to weed out the data from the propaganda….

There is no real "data" to pull from the weeds there. It's a lot of sheer speculation.

 

[justatruthseeker]

There is no real "data" to pull from the weeds there. It's a lot of sheer speculation.

Yes… all science is bad…. Claim the fanatics….

 

[Right Divider]

Yes… all science is bad…. Claim the fanatics….

False accusation, try again.