Philosophy teaching with meaningless platitudes. Philosophy platitudes is all the UB ever offers. There is no direction. Nothing to help you in your time of trouble or need. Nothing to connect one to his/her Savior in a meaningful way."When once you grasp the idea of God as a true and loving Father,
Do you EVER read your book critically? EVER???
Er, cartoonish and run-on sentence. It is a platitude trying to be grandiose and is vulgar. God has all (ALL) rights to His creation. YOU, Joe (Caino) are owned, regardless if you want to be or not. God owns us. We are creatures, creations, owned. EVEN IF (He is not) God were a tyrant, YOU don't get to say anything about it. YOU are a creature. Owned. A creation owned.the only concept which Jesus ever taught, you must forthwith, in all consistency, utterly abandon all those primitive notions about God as an offended monarch, a stern and all-powerful ruler whose chief delight is to detect his subjects in wrongdoing and to see that they are adequately punished,
Ah, see? Total disdain for the whole New Testament, not just Paul. It is wicked, brutal, and wrong-headed. It is a creature defiantly inappropriate to his/her Creator.unless some being almost equal to himself should volunteer to suffer for them, to die as a substitute and in their stead.
WHO CARES what Sadler thought? Caino of course, but who else? The difference here: I'm not audacious. I KNOW I'm a creature, not a god dictating to God. I'm just a creation. You go ahead and be a god and contend with God whether you are right or wrong, simply because you want to be a god that dictates to God how He should behave before you'll follow Him.The whole idea of ransom and atonement is incompatible with the concept of God as it was taught and exemplified by Jesus of Nazareth.
I'm convinced most who say stuff like this have a thin veneer of understanding of what love is AND that they themselves are terrible at anything but self-love (arrogance, selfishness).The infinite love of God is not secondary to anything in the divine nature.
Nope. We love BECAUSE we were first loved by God. It is the reason I think most people who talk like this (if not all of them) are really the egocentric gods of their own making and truly have little love for any but themselves. It is why the UB says "Only natural" so often. It is all geocentricism in the flesh.188:4.9 All this concept of atonement and sacrificial salvation is rooted and grounded in selfishness.
Like robbing them, stabbing them, ignoring them, passing off false teaching of those who want to be god instead of following the Only God, etc. etc.......Jesus taught that service to one's fellows is the highest concept of the brotherhood of spirit believers.
James says: You believe in God? So do demons and they tremble.Salvation should be taken for granted by those who believe in the fatherhood of God.
The UB is antiChrist and antiBiblical (of course you know the latter is true, but the former also).
Retarded, frankly. Dying and 'wanting to be saved' is NOT selfish. YOU don't know why I'd want to be saved if I were drowning. When was the last time you watched the Coast Guard rescue someone and said "That kid is incredibly selfish!!!"The believer's chief concern should not be the selfish desire for personal salvation
Not only retarded, inappropriate, presumptuous, and DEFINITELY not from God or any of His messengers. Do you EVER THINK CRITICALLY when reading your awful book, Joe???
You'll never but reach a platitude of this. There is no way, in the flesh, anybody is going to love sacrificially. Only people who really do think of others before themselves will/can love another. Only new creations love this way. Paul said 'possibly' a man would die for another, if they were good, but not for the wicked and enemy. Your book never touches on that, which is why I call them pointless platitudes. It NEVER gets down to the nitty gritty of life, just gives empty words and meaningless pointless philosophies.
No I don't trouble myself except for YOUR future. I'm in Christ. I literally have Him with me and it is confirmed in scripture how I'd know. You have no such assurance.188:4.10 Neither do genuine believers trouble themselves so much about the future punishment of sin.
Good grief. This poor author just said that such ideas were 'selfish' and in the next breath indulges them! THINK CRITICALLY, CAINO!The real believer is only concerned about present separation from God.
Assumes that there are no 'wolves.'True, wise fathers may chasten their sons, but they do all this in love and for corrective purposes. They do not punish in anger, neither do they chastise in retribution.
Says the guy (Sadler and his friend who was so lazy he couldn't get out of bed for a year). Who cares what either of them think? I JUST proved the UB isn't from God just above.188:4.11 Even if God were the stern and legal monarch of a universe in which justice ruled supreme, he certainly would not be satisfied with the childish scheme of substituting an innocent sufferer for a guilty offender." UB 1955
God CANNOT have murdering, robbing, abuse, harm, or any other wickedness in His presence. Your book lays down a slap on the wrist as if God is wicked for addressing sin and is 'cruel' for doing so : Plain: It is childish rationalizing, Caino. Grow up and learn to think critically. It is time.