The mountains being "ancient".
The Late Great Urantia Revelation
- Thread starter Caino
- Start date
- Status
Right Divider
Body part
Thousands of years is ancient.
Are you from Australia?
Only among science deniers.
No, but somehow the Kangaroo hoped all the way back to Australia after the flood.....and nowhere else.
Right Divider
Body part
Only among people that don't know what words like "ancient" mean.
I'm all about science... real science... not the wild-eyed speculations of the "billions of years" crowd.
You are about AIG quack pseudo science. The Ken Ham sandwich special.
So what?
Last I checked, the Hebrew Old Testament is practically identical to the Dead Sea Scrolls...
And THOSE are ancient...
Your faith is not in God, but in a god made in your own image.
Which means absolutely nothing.
Sorry, but while a few civilizations may be old, they aren't older than the Flood.
No it's not.
Sorry, not that old.
Considering Deuteronomy was written between 1500 and 1400 BC, and the flood occurred between 3200 and 3300 BC, that means the mountains that were formed during the flood would, in fact, be ancient, as they would be over 1700 years old! THAT'S ANCIENT!
The answer is in Genesis 10.
This coming from someone who believes the Urantia Book is a true story...
Right Divider
Body part
I'd be glad to debate the subject with you, except that I know that you are not up to the task.
The dead sea scrolls are Just fragmented copies of what was finalized in Babylon. Taken down to Qumran for sake keeping before Gentile vengeance fell upon Jerusalem.
I was debating with you guys on evolution but then got blocked from that section because you phony scientist couldn't refute radiometric dating techniques.
There is only one reason to refute the dating techniques of science, to fit the Israelites story of origins.
Right Divider
Body part
I have explained the problems with radiometric dating techniques many times here on TOL. But people like you have your ears plugged and are brain dead on the topic.
There are no problems with radiometric dating. Its verifiable and fully accepted out in the real world beyond Bible worship
Have any evidence to support that claim?
Again, evidence?
Or are you just saying that because the UB tells you that it is so?
You were blocked from that section because what you were trying to talk about wasn't science, it was cultish nonsense. It doesn't belong in the science section.
It's because radiometric dating techniques are inherently based on unprovable and incorrect assumptions.
C-14 dating, however, is pretty reliable... (when calibrated properly...)
More anti-semitic nonsense.
We are validating our science while the Bible history was debunked long ago.
Yes, there is evidence. Go ask the flawless Jewish people who have been working on the Dead Sea scroll dates.
Dead Sea Scrolls Mystery Solved?
Right Divider
Body part
You have no idea what you're talking about.
I understand that you would rather worship man-made "science" than to believe the real thing.
Because you say so?
It's not verifiable. Give two samples of rock from a few inches apart the same rock layer to a radiometric dating facility, and they will come up with two very different dates. Oh wait, you can't do that anymore, because it would show how inaccurate the testing is... They need to know exactly where you got it from and how old the rock layers around it are supposed to be, which is completely counterproductive....
Actually, Wikipedia is wrong on this one:
Digital Dead Sea Scrolls at the Israel Museum, Jerusalem - The Project
The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls have had dramatic implications for the study of Jewish history, providing scholars with a large and diverse (mostly religious) literary corpus from the Hellenistic-Roman Period.
dss.collections.imj.org.il
Dating from the 3rd century BC to the 1st century AD.
If by validation you mean constantly coming up with ad hoc rescue devices and changing the story, then sure.
But the Bible has never been debunked.
Caino, question for you, and I would like you to answer this:
When atheistic and/or secular archaeologists go out on a dig in the middle east, which book do you think most of them bring with them?
See the link above.
Alright, I've had enough of your anti-semitism. Time for you to take a break.
- Status