The Catholics teach that EVERY TIME a Eucharist is made it is a sacrifice.
First you bare the same false witness as the slandering Jews in Acts 6:13-14 who claimed Stephen DID preach that Jesus DID change the customs Moses delivered...(Stephen did not as Jesus did NOT)
But now you insist to embarrass yourself with your misrepresentation of catholic teaching as well:
“The crucifixion was a one-time historical event. We must keep in mind, however, that Jesus is God. He was subject to time in His human nature, but in His Divine Nature, He is outside of time. Jesus is called “a priest for ever”: not for six hours on the cross only...
In this sense, the one crucifixion is “eternally present” and supernaturally “brought to us” in the Sacrifice of the Mass.
this divine sacrifice which is celebrated in the mass, that same Christ is contained and immolated in an unbloody manner, who once offered Himself in a bloody manner on the altar of the cross...
The notion of eucharistic sacrifice (in the Catholic sense) was common in the Church fathers' writings. Thus, one might misinterpret what Trent expressed, and come up with the notion of “sacrificed again and again”...
As a man, Jesus' sacrifice was in time and history. As God, outside of time (from
that perspective), it is not. His being God brings in a “supra-historical” aspect in which time is transcended. This is what Protestants often seem to neglect. If Jesus is our high priest forever, He is still offering Himself, out of time, because that's what priests do
https://www.ncregister.com/blog/darm...-at-every-mass
Why do you twist so much?
They teach He is outside of law of time and outside of law of biology...timeless and unbloody...
Sadly this teaching has Him outside the Law of Yah as well...
Of course what I preach is not Catholic or Protestant.
Not biblical either...
yours is another gospel from another Christ...another everyday all day Sabbath...your sabbath
Paul was clear...He did NOT teach against the Law...and teaching to eat His flesh and drink His blood would be exactly that...
Acts 21:24 but he took a vow to prove he walks orderly and keeps the law
Acts 24: 12-14 he caused NO disputes...you think he could do that teaching Sabbath is now everyday? LOL but he was worshipping the God of his fathers according to the Way a Sabbath keeping sect believing ALL things OT...no NT yet...
Acts 25: 8 neither against the law of the jews (given to Israel) or the temple did he offend...I think teaching an everyday Sabbath would offend at least some Jews...
Acts 26: 20 Jews and Gentiles should repent turn to Yah and do works befitting repentance...you think YOUR everyday Sabbath is a work He established?
Acts 28:17 he claims to jews he did NOTHING against our people or the customs of our fathers...you think YOUR everyday Sabbath would NOT be against the pious zealous jews or their ancient customs?
Acts 28:28 Paul concludes that salvation of Yah has been sent to the Gentiles and they will hear it...so why would they need salvation if the Law was NOT to them? It was...and they crowded the synagogues every Sabbath...as James expected
Acts 16: 20 what were the gentile Philippians complaining? “They teach customs which are not lawful for us Romans to receive and observe” you think Romans would refuse Sunday Ham? Of course not but that was NOT on the table...
Acts 5: 40 you really think zealous jews wanting to KILL the apostles would agree with Gamaliel’s advice to leave them alone because teaching “the Sabbath was done away with it is everyday all day...let’s eat dogs” might actually be of Yah?
But you would have Paul teach otherwise in his letters...letters that could be submitted at his trials as evidence he was lying...IF they perjured him...they do not
Yup what you teach is NOT biblical...