And colliding black holes made up of spacetime warpage is something we can empirically verify because gravitational waves have been detected coming from them?
No science fiction or imagination here, move on. :devil:
View attachment 26324
--Dave
The earth is flat and we never went to the moon--Part II
- Thread starter DFT_Dave
- Start date
- Status
And colliding black holes made up of spacetime warpage is something we can empirically verify because gravitational waves have been detected coming from them?
No science fiction or imagination here, move on. :devil:
View attachment 26324
--Dave
Greg Jennings
New member
I've been to a place called the Kettle Black and I have a black kettle, but absolutely no one has ever, or will ever, go to, see, or verify the existence of a space time warped black hole. This is an imagined place we can only get to on a fictional spaceship at an impossible warp speed.
View attachment 26325 View attachment 26326
A black hole through a telescope. Who are we to question? :colt45:
--Dave
It is always interesting to watch people attempt to dismiss a topic when they find themselves incapable of dealing with the facts. That more than any other reason presented on your two threads is why you are not able to swing people to your world view. You lack credibility.
As if information about black holes is a verified fact or that they even exist.
When whatever person in science can say whatever about space they can imagine and people like you buy into it shows a lack of thinking for yourself about how such information is proven to be true.
Talk about being gullible.
--Dave
IN science, we use nat attic a models to make predictions about things, the workings of gravity. Nobody made anything up. The models predicted that gravity waves would exist if the model was correct. Recently gravity waves were observed and measured. In science, that verifies the validity of the models. It is an ex it ing time in science when a long standing hypothesis is verified. Yo use your words, the gravity waves were proof that your original post stating that gravity waves have not been detected is now wrong.
Last edited:
You may want to spell check your post. Just FYI there are a few typos.
ISS Lightning - Awful CGI
From Video : Okay, I admit it - I'm no computer graphics expert but this just looks awful. I also don't have a degree in meteorology but I don't think clouds morph like that during lightning. I didn't add the weird lighting issue at 1:34 either. But it's late at night and I might just be tired.Original Video: https://youtu.be/FaEqIudQUjw
5 minutes - I love this fake footage - so "magical"
From Video : Okay, I admit it - I'm no computer graphics expert but this just looks awful. I also don't have a degree in meteorology but I don't think clouds morph like that during lightning. I didn't add the weird lighting issue at 1:34 either. But it's late at night and I might just be tired.Original Video: https://youtu.be/FaEqIudQUjw
5 minutes - I love this fake footage - so "magical"
The only sentence that matters in this post is.... "Okay, I admit it - I'm no computer graphics expert"
What this moron doesn't realize is this video is a time lapse video using high resolution digital cameras. Not every second is being captured by the camera which causes the shifting from frame to frame when slowed down. And it's not like this fact is hidden. Usually right on the video page they will add a note like this... "All footage has been color graded, denoised, deflickered, slowed down and stabilized. Clips were then complied and converted to 1080 HD at 24 frames/sec."
If you want to you can see what a shot from the ISS looks like without any effects on the video... you can see a live shot from the ISS here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtU_mdL2vBM
Flat Earth theory.... it's what happens when people who have no idea what they are talking about regarding science, physics, math, geography, astronomy, perspective, computer graphics, history, digital video, pretend they know more than the people who do know about these subjects. :rotfl:
Isn't that what all conspiracies are founded on? People who have no idea what they are talking about?
Yeah, you guys are a regular Algonquin Round Table :rotfl:
David,
If I prove that the Earth is not flat, will you drop Christianity on the basis that the bible has been falsified?
That is a serious question. I'd appreciate a straight answer.
Clete
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
All we need is one legit picture from 100 miles up, with no fish eye lens, showing us the curve.
It has never been done. That would end the debate once and for all.
Try the live feed camera. Clear picture, no fisheye, shows the curve of the earth.
Right Divider
Body part
Why didn't you put "legit" in quotes?
I'm not sure about you, but most flat earthers simply reject any photo that disagrees their philosophy. Whether it be legit or not.
I would also remind you that 100 miles up is just barely over 1% of the diameter of the earth.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Thanks. I'd rather see an actual rocket lift off with a camera attached.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
NASA has put out photos less than 100 miles miles up...with ridiculous curve in some instances, flat in others, and curving the opposite direction when the camera moves. (evidence of fish eye)
Right Divider
Body part
Try SpaceX's channel. They should have a few.
- Status