Bladerunner
Active member
Below you said you believe the prophecies of Daniel. the biggest question is: when to they begin. we know that in Dan 9:25.."Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times." I have come to believe that this time is with Nehemiah 2:1.."And it came to pass in the month Nisan, in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes the king........" Here we have the month and year when it all started. A prophecy fulfilled. 483 weeks of years that turn into after adjustments for leap years (extra lunar days, etc.) 173,880 days until day that Jesus rode into Jerusalem, April 6, 32 AD on a faithful Sunday.What little I saw in your post didn't give an explanation on what dates were used to arrive at that conclusion.
Great to hear about Daniel's prophecies. I accept your rejection of 32 AD.I believe the prophecies of Daniell.
I reject your conclusion that it means Christ was crucified in AD 32.
God gave them that time in Genesis, Evening and the Morning....24 hours divided into two parts...The Romans used this timing in a little different form of 6 hours four times per day. For at midnight, "the thief in the night" would come calling and every soldier that was asleep on their watch would simple disappear, not to be seen or heard again.. Death came upon them...Not quite.
I don't mind using 6pm to make it simpler to convey, but in reality, they started the new day after sunset, and it was "night" when it was dark enough for three specific stars in the night sky to become visible, at least according to rabbinic tradition.
But Biblically, the new day starts at evening, when the sun sets, since they didn't have timekeeping devices like we do today.
with one exception I agree...Yes. Likewise, God passes over those who are washed in the blood of the Lamb who was slain for the sins of the world, Jesus Christ.
Since the calculations of 173,880 days landed the day Jesus rode into Jerusalem with the 6 days before His Crucifixion at Bethany (in scripture), the 13th was Wednesday and Passover was that evening.14th. that next day was preparation for Thursday High Sabbath. Feast of Unleavened Bread.Saying it doesn't make it so.
Yes, and?
You're still begging the question that the Crucifixion was on the 13th.
I know, but you ask and I explained my position as I believe that His Church is 'one body full of Jews and Gentile believers' over the thousands of years began in Acts 2. long before Paul showed up but shortly after the ascension of Jesus.I have no idea what you're talking about.
I'm a Mid-Acts Dispensationalist.
It lines up perfectly with the 4 BC birth including the death of Herod. This is another conversation. where the dates of the Bible and others play a big part in determining His actual birthday.The problem is that there are multiple oher things that an AD 32 crucifixion doesn't line up with, not the least of which is Christ's birth in 3 BC.
again, we disagree.!Then it follows that your timeline is wrong.
YES, From Sunday evening back to Bethany and back to Jerusalem on Monday, etc....the third day, rem 6 days to His death from Bethany...the 8th on Friday. Rem, Passover meal was eaten after the crucifixion and during the first three or so hours of the 14th. Wednesday Evening which was considered to be Thursday. YEAH--we agree on something. lolYou can't have it both ways, Blade.
No, Thursday was the 14th. From sunset on Wednesday, to sunset on Thursday, that was 14 Nisan.
Did He not do that on the 3rd day (Tuesday-12th)..Biblically, I am pretty sure He did.Yet you left out one of the most crucial, that of Jesus telling his disciples to get a room for the meal they were about to have.
No, they just fit perfectly, Biblically and Historically.You cut out Wednesday's events (or Tuesday's or Monday's, I'm not sure which, but it doesn't really matter) and moved Thursday's events onto Wednesday.
On Tuesday, did He not tell them to make ready for the Passover meal. He already had it set up according to scriptures.Did not Jesus specifically tell his disciples to prepare the passover lamb for them to eat at dinner?
You are right.Wednesday was the 13th with Sunday being the 10th...Jesus died that day and the Passover Meal was that evening 14th Nisan. You got it right, except you keep trying to make Wednesday into Thursday or something?Why could they not eat the Passover lamb after sundown on Wednesday (Thursday, start of 14 Nisan in the evening)? If Thursday was Passover, and I'm pretty sure you agree that it is, at this point, then there's no harm in eating the passover meal at the start of the new day, after sunset on 14 Nisan, right?
All Mat and all the others as well is telling us that Mary discovered the tomb empty about the time the angel rolled back the stone..Jesus had received His new transfigured body and would have been able to be outside of the tomb minutes after 6pm the evening before. Rem, the event of His appearing in the upper room..No He did not walk through the room, He actually appeared.That would go against scripture, no?
Specifically, Matthew 28: 1-3,
Again, the scriptures are speaking of the timing of Mary's and company arrival at the tomb and their conversations before arriving on how to remove the stone.Mark 16:1-10,
Both of the above scriptures tell the same story but each has a little different context. Yet, they are all speaking of Mary and company arriving at the tomb at sunrise or considered 6 AM.Luke 24:1-12, and John 20:1-10.
ok, Mar 16:9 "Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week....."Especially Mark 16:9-10, which says He rose early on the first day. "Early," being "at dawn" in the Greek text.
When did the first day of the week happen. at 6pm last evening. It does not say morning, early in the day..and the day began at 6pm last evening...We surely are not arguing about the time He arose for it matters not.. whether it was 2 minutes after 6pm or 15 minutes before 6AM, He arose for us. Amen
ok, it is simply the way I read it, my hermeneutics.You can't just make stuff up to suit your fancy or your preferred beliefs.
No, have look and researched the Thursday and Friday's scenarios and they simply do not fit with God's WORD..I would have to change something...the way I have laid it out, I have not changed anything.Why? Because you don't like it? Because it contradicts your beliefs and you're not willing to reconsider them?
I have truly given you what I believe to be true. I have been researching a Bible dating based upon the 50th year (Jubilee)from the first year of Adam to 2025 (AM Dating) and then backwards (AD to BC) from 2025 to the 1st year of Adam for the last 4 years. One runs into a lot of different information both biblically and historically. Each has to be dealt with, studied, compared with other beliefs. There are many opinions/beliefs for example about dating of the fall of Judah (the 1st time) by Nebuchadnezzar. Which is true and which fits with the Bible, God's Word. Am I stubborn, Yes because I believe that Jesus has provided the answer to all questions concerning His WORD..and He certainly knows everything that has, is and will be argued about His Word.?Or because of some yet unstated evidence that shows that your position better fits Scripture and the evidence?
I would hope it's the latter, otherwise you're just being stubborn and your disagreement is tacit admission that my position is better than yours and your position failed to match the data.
I do disagree with you but I am not going to trash your beliefs because I believe something else. You and the Good Lord will have to come to that arrangement and His Will will be done in His own time. By the way, has it occurred to you that we are having these discussions for a reason not known at this time. You see, I believe that He has brought us together at this time and place for reasons only He knows and will share in His own time...
How about you. why do you not see the way I have outlined His Crucifixion and Resurrection.?
thanks for the conversation and may the Blessing of God be upon you and yours this new day.