ECT Never the Twain

Status
Not open for further replies.

Danoh

New member
:rotfl:

:mock: How many "Greek grammars" do I need?

If ever you finally learn the truth about the ministry of Paul, you'll understand that dispensation of the grace of God has nothing to do with the promises to Israel. And that God chose twelve apostles for Israel for a reason.

You are lost in the wild fantasy world of men's vain opinions: silly commentary land.

Nope.

God's promises to Israel depend upon the success of His dispensation of the Grace of God.

It is why, and what, is behind His having planned all along to temporarily interrupt the Prophetic aspect of His TWO-Fold Purpose (His plans and purpose for Israel) with this other aspect of said TWO-Fold Purpose: The Mystery.

Which concerns His plan to reconcile back unto Himself FIRST those EVEN NOW fallen "high" or Heavenly "places" PRESENTLY STILL under the dominion of "the prince of the power of the air" and his dark "princes."

No point in reconciling the Earth back unto Himself first, or absent of not reconciling BEFORE THAT those fallen high places.

For they were what led to the Earth's "course of this world" or "spirit" of rebellion "that" even "now worketh in the children of" Adam's "disobedience."

No point in "thy will be done IN" the "earth, AS IN heaven" until AFTER the above, is resolved FIRST.

THIS is WHY The ONE Mystery of Romans thru Philemon that The Dispensation of the Grace of God is merely a means of.

Matt. 4; Matt. 6; 1 Cor. 2; 1 Cor. 15; Rom. 5; Rom. 8; Rom. 16; Eph. 1; Eph. 2 & 3; etc.

Nevertheless, Romans 5:8.
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
The truth is, saint john, that equally capable godly and equally godly capable men down through the annuls of history have agreed with Interloper.

Look, Mighty Mouse-You are out of step with mainline, orhodox prooftexting, in the context of sound, Biblical hermeneutics. You are mudding the waters, and your exegesis/eisegesis is based on faulty constructs, and your cult is a modern sect, not accepted by most credible biblical scholars, and has been rejected by most credible biblical commentaries. Zeal without knowledge is not good. Sincerity does not create truth. Are you sure you are not a closet Calvinist?
 

Danoh

New member
We often read the conclusion of a book to find out what really matters: go for it. sink into Acts 26, the last presentation on all this by Paul and see what he said in normal language. Not in 2p2p-speak where gloms of crud are imported from all over for whimsical reasons.

Often, only to find upon going back to read the prior portion of a book, that one has read things into the ending, absent of the much more well understanding of things, the prior portion of the book would have allowed.

Quit being so lazy, already - put your ever crystal clear obvious over reliance on your just as ever obvious ever endless books "about" and get in THE Book about, Itself.

For as far as your notions of God's plans and purpose as to Israel...

Isaiah 8:20 To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.

Nevertheless, the light of Romans 5:8 towards you.
 

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
Look, Mighty Mouse-You are out of step with mainline, orhodox prooftexting, in the context of sound, Biblical hermeneutics. You are mudding the waters, and your exegesis/eisegesis is based on faulty constructs, and your cult is a modern sect, not accepted by most credible biblical scholars, and has been rejected by most credible biblical commentaries. Zeal without knowledge is not good. Sincerity does not create truth. Are you sure you are not a closet Calvinist?

The extent of your interp problems are summarized thusly, "You do not hold the Head". Your obsession with the red dirt promises of the old clouds your judgment, and you fail to see the lighted illumination of the NHNE event. Your view is Pharasiacal in this regard and is "total crap".
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
The extent of your interp problems are summarized thusly, "You do not hold the Head". Your obsession with the red dirt promises of the old clouds your judgment, and you fail to see the lighted illumination of the NHNE event. Your view is Pharasiacal in this regard and is "total crap".

Perhaps so, Mary Ellen, but at least I know, and have a bull's eye, on the....

mission-statement-img1.jpg


The days of literalism are over.

Of course, do not take "The Mission" literally...
 

heir

TOL Subscriber
Yes, but following Paul is to not end up D'ist or 2P2P. It is
1, the resurrection was the enthronement
2, the new covenant is enjoyed now
3, the resurrection is the completion of what was promised to the fathers, because the land does not matter to Paul; what matters is that the blessing to the nations through the Seed, not seeds, gets to them through preaching justification in Christ
4, the belief of the Gospel found amonth the Gentiles is the restoring of David's fallen tent


D'ism and 2P2P are so full of crumbling, wobbling proof texts, that their will be contests for all time about what they mean--so long as you have bought the D'ist premise.
What in tarnation are you going on about? That didn't make any sense to me.
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
Paul spoke more about the resurrection than any other apostle. If the resurrection was the enthronement, where does Paul declare him to now be the coronated, seated and reigning King of all the earth?

And who was the man of sin?




The enthroned, reigning Christ: Eph 1:20-22, Phil 2:9, I Cor 15:25, I Tim 1:17 (Kings reign, generally...)

Man of Sin. Please read the essay 'the Rebellion that Desolates' so that you know why there are 3 answers. Adjust your frame of mind to the apostle: it was going to happen soon, at the temple...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top