masks work .. to infect you :(

annabenedetti

Well-known member
Do you have any reason to believe that the rate of testing would be different between the population of people who wear masks and the population of people who don't wear masks?

Not talking about that. Although I still wish I knew his credentials.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Temp Banned
That's ironic, especially coming from the person who hardly ever provides any evidence of his own.

I think I'll pass this time.
So you haven't got any then?

Otherwise, I often provide sources to back up or substantiate assertions rather than "I say so".
 

way 2 go

Well-known member
Again from @ianmSC, credentials unknown.

What good are new case graphs, though?
new cases of wuflu is how governments decide policies
but most governments only take into account their areas of control

which is why we post charts from @ianmSC (which you can fact check )
to compare non pharmaceutical interventions or NPI's

Ewh8azLWEAM7TZ6.jpg
 

annabenedetti

Well-known member
He typically gets his numbers from the CDC. So his "credentials" are quite irrelevant.

Anyone can get numbers from the CDC. That doesn't mean they can analyze them correctly, so his credentials are indeed relevant. Aren't you even a little bit curious?
 
Last edited:

annabenedetti

Well-known member
new cases of wuflu is how governments decide policies
but most governments only take into account their areas of control

Okay, here's an example of what I mean. (Apparently the Covid Tracking Project stopped tracking on 3/7, so I'm using the 7th.)

Screen Shot 2021-03-15 at 11.58.14 AM.png



This gives you a different kind of information, as does number of deaths per million population. The number of cases can be much higher than the tested rate would indicate in a state which did less testing. That's my point. That's all.
 

Right Divider

Body part
Anyone can get numbers from the CDC.
Yes, we can.
That doesn't mean they can analyze them correctly, so his credentials are indeed relevant.
What "analysis" is he doing?
He's simply segregated the data based on mask "mandates" in the various counties.
Aren't you even a little bit curious?
I don't have to be curious, since I understand the extremely simple nature of the data that he's presenting.

You have your mind set against reality, so you're looking for a boogieman where none exists.
 
Last edited:

way 2 go

Well-known member
Okay, here's an example of what I mean. (Apparently the Covid Tracking Project stopped tracking on 3/7, so I'm using the 7th.)





This gives you a different kind of information, as does number of deaths per million population. The number of cases can be much higher than the tested rate would indicate in a state which did less testing. That's my point. That's all.

a person with a sore throat for a day dose not get tested , but the only person I know that tested
positive for the wuflu that was his only symptom & the only reason he was tested was someone
where he worked tested positive so he had to get tested too , otherwise he would have never known


most people don't know they had the wuflu

Screenshot_2021-03-16 IM ( ianmSC) Twitter2.png

Screenshot_2021-03-16 IM ( ianmSC) Twitter.png
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator

Nobel Prize Winning Inventor of PCR Test UNLOADS on Dr. Fauci in Earlier Video

Kary Mullis, who won a 1993 Nobel Prize for inventing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing procedure that is currently used to diagnose Coronavirus cases unloaded on Dr. Anthony Fauci in a video that went viral over the weekend.

In the resurfaced video Kary Mullis accused Fauci of “not knowing anything really about anything” but going on TV anyway and lying to the American public.
 

marke

Well-known member
Because you're a scientific expert where it comes to pandemics and effective measures to curtail the spread?

Nope.

Go follow some more rubbish like "We Are Paul Revere" JR.
Rand Paul asked Fauci to provide scientific research to support his pompous declarations and imperious edicts. Fauci is a buffoon with an enlarged ego. Of course he produced no scientific evidence to back up his mask-wearing nonsense.
 

way 2 go

Well-known member
Top