I asked the question, regretabbly expecting a fool of an answer.
You did not dissapoint. Don't feel bad.
And I'm sure we've read the end of your foul mouthed imagery.
ECT MADists don't follow Paul
- Thread starter tetelestai
- Start date
I asked the question, regretabbly expecting a fool of an answer.
You did not dissapoint. Don't feel bad.
And I'm sure we've read the end of your foul mouthed imagery.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
No you didn't expect an answer.
That's why when it came you screamed like a scalded dog.
Don't try to lay a guilt trip on me, you talked your own self up on that fence fella.:shocked:
You really should stop runnin' roun' nekkid.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
Yes, I was hoping he would expose himself as a heretic, just as you have also done for yourself. It is you Englishizers who twist scripture when you don't know what words mean and substitute your concepts in place of truth.
You add to subtract. That's the very definition of evil, but you don't know it. It is you who are beguiled by the subtlety of words in a language that did not exist when the text was inspired.
Your hearts and minds are conformed to the subtle untruths of English words. You can't see how you have been groomed from the womb by language. It's your ontology. Your false reality of existence. You're the unwitting victim of dozens of modern revolutions by the spirit of antichrist to set up his kingdom in the hearts of men.
You don't want to know the truth. You just want to pretend others are what you actually are. As did the serpent and Eve by adding to what God said, so do you with your English concepts that are the devices of the enemy.
Cross Reference
New member
You either. <two faced>
Right Divider
Body part
This verse says just the OPPOSITE of 'everything is just spiritual".
Feel free to show what those passages I cited in my examples were actually talking about.
Or, feel free to continue to attempt to distract from the obvious with more of your OVER reliance on academ-anemia :chuckle:
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
Feel free to distinguish between Greek articular/anarthrous nouns and English definite/indefinite article nouns all throughout scripture.
Or, feel free to continue to attempt to distract from the obvious with more of your OVER reliance on your English-sculpted heart and mind against the truth of scripture.
Your false autonomy is irrelevant.
So you don't find a problem with what I said those words were referring to in those passages :chuckle:
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
I didn't bother to read it closely enough to examine the conclusions you arrived at via your false autonomy.
It's not a dichotomy of is/isn't for word meanings, it's a gradient of degree of accuracy for meaning. Single English words, even when close to Greek meaning, do not sufficiently convey the word meaning because of the differing language structure.
You have no clue what the effects of language are upon Epistemological funcion of the heart and mind. And you're in the epidemic majority.
Even if you utilize valid single English words, the entire context is not conveyed. Low-context does not convey high-context. You don't and can't know what that means, nor do you want to learn anything besides what you think you know.
That's the devices (noema - concepts of the mind) of Satan that we are not to be ignorant of, and you are.
:mock: calvinists
Calvinism is the most fundamental set of doctrine of the Reformation, which has strong historical influence.
Darbyism is, well, Darbyism
lain:
heir
TOL Subscriber
Colossians 2:8 KJV
Habitual, greasy liar, and actress:
Vs.
" That's not my argument.
I have never said that dispensationalism was "wrong" because of how old it was. I specifically said that no one taught about Christ coming back twice before Darby did."-Tellalie
“I never said it was wrong for how old it is.”-Tellalie
Vs.
"My argument is that if there is not one single trace of something for 1,800+ years by anyone, then it was invented.”-Tet.
Lying punk.
Does PPS know any other languages fluently ? All I ever see him type is English, which he hates.
"All Dispensationalists are Darby followers."-Tellalie
There you go, TOL-again, this greasy slanderer spams this devil charge.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Ontologically, he knows all languages.
Tellialie, the Hankie Hannegraaf follower, and wimp, has come up with a new, cute little characterization.
You greasy slanderer, as all you do is copy'npaste J. Stewart Russell's "AD 70-ism" "invention," and regurgitate, plagiarize, that stooge, Hankie Hannegraaf.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
On the contrary, I love English. It has the most prolific potential of expressing anything of any language in history, which is why it can't be used in the inverse manner as you and most are doing.