SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
From your buddy:
Two peas in a pod.
From your buddy:
That's not what the verse says
(John 1:11 KJV) He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
Christ Jesus was a Jew from the line of Judah. It was the Jews who rejected Him.
The lost sheep of the House of Israel were not Jews. That's who Jesus said He came for.
So, He was a Jew, Who came unto His Own: Jews, who rejected Him.
But actually, He did not come unto His Own, but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Better take your meds, Tel: you'll soon be writing "Darby!!!" on your arms with a pen knife :chuckle:
Not my fault you don't understand it.
The lost sheep from the house of Israel were never Jews.
The Jews rejected, and killed Jesus, not the lost sheep from the House of Israel.
As long as you remain blind to the fact that the 10 tribes were never Jews, you will never understand it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jeremiah was concerned with all of Israel & Judah everywhere, not just in Babylon.Yes, but God only divorced the House of Israel. God never divorced the House of Judah.
No, God married one wife (Israel). However, Israel split into two houses, and God treated each house as a wife, and each as sisters.
Read Ezekiel 23. Oholah, and her sister Oholibah represent Israel and Judah.
He didn't. See above.
Yes. No man separated the House of Israel, it was God who divorced her.
(Jer 3:8) I gave faithless Israel her certificate of divorce and sent her away because of all her adulteries. .....
That has to do with the judgment on Babylon.
Babylon was punished for what they did to Judah and Israel.
Ah, but the destruction of Jerusalem, that's -- that's where I had them! They laughed at me and made jokes but I proved beyond the shadow of a doubt, with geometric logic and allegorical percision, that Josephus was right! I -- I know now they were only trying to protect some fellow officer, no doubt that Lt. Darby.
Jeremiah was concerned with all of Israel & Judah everywhere, not just in Babylon.
Jeremiah 23 KJV
(3) And I will gather the remnant of my flock out of all countries whither I have driven them, and will bring them again to their folds; and they shall be fruitful and increase.
(6) In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is his name whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.
(7) Therefore, behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that they shall no more say, The LORD liveth, which brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt;
(8) But, The LORD liveth, which brought up and which led the seed of the house of Israel out of the north country, and from all countries whither I had driven them; and they shall dwell in their own land.
Jeremiah was concerned with all of Israel & Judah everywhere, not just in Babylon.
I know.Correct.
Sure does't.But that doesn't take away from the fact that the two houses were divided.
Both houses were scattered.Nor does it take away the fact that God divorced, scattered, had no mercy on, and told the Israelites from the 10 tribes that they were "not a people".
I know.
Sure does't.
Israel was divided.
The BOC was not divided.
Both houses were scattered.
Both will be brought back united again into one.
The BOC was never split, scattered, and has no need for a promise of being restored and united once again as they were before.
Israel was divided.
The BOC was not divided.
No matter how hard you Dispies try, and no matter how hard you Dispies want it to not be, the fact remains that Dispensationalism didn't exist until John Nelson Darby invented it in the year 1830.
Sure, Tel - just as the law of gravity did not exist until whomever first came along to codify it into a verbal description as a principle...
You have repeatedly proven nothing by your incompetent assertion, once more; other than the obvious fact in words, once more...
That you are...an incompetent...plain and simple.
This fact about you had also existed way, way before I first came along...to put it in words :chuckle:
The irony...Well, you just lost the debate by resorting to ad hominem.
No . . what you are really saying, is that no one knew Truth or Grace until Darby came along and reinvented, according to new discovery, Christianity itself!
Well, you just lost the debate by resorting to ad hominem.
:chuckle:
Tet does not deserve your insults. . .
Indeed. There were 12 tribes in tact in the first century.