http://www.fallacyfiles.org/equivoqu.html
Does this apply? It seems there is equivocation with terms.
Death/destruction has a semantical range of meaning. Tim simply begs the question with one definition (English vs theological/biblical) of the terms to suit his preconceptions.
If we look at all relevant texts, all uses of the words, range of meaning of the words, principles, exegesis/passages, etc., it will not support his heresy.
The posts become pointless because he ignores these issues and just covers his ears and repeats that death and destruction are cessation, contrary to evidence.
Time to quit wasting our time.