Is marital rape scripturally defensible?
- Thread starter annabenedetti
- Start date
- Status
Yeah, but that would require the woman to accept some sort of accountability for something- and that just doesn't do. They are then victims of being accountable :chuckle:
So we are bound by God to have sex when we may not want to?
1 Corinthians 1-5
Now concerning the matters about which you wrote: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” But because of the temptation to sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband. The husband should give to his wife her conjugal rights, and likewise the wife to her husband. For the wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. Likewise the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does. Do not deprive one another, except perhaps by agreement for a limited time, that you may devote yourselves to prayer; but then come together again, so that Satan may not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.
Using the Bible to justify your feminized mindset is futile, because the red highlight is all you see.
Your name should be 'jane patrick' :chuckle:
Thanks Mrs. Crucible, but what about respecting your partner's wishes? No means no
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
nonsense - i understand better than you how traumatic being raped is
i also understand that those who have been exposed to trauma - of any kind - are better off getting over it than dwelling on it
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
that's exactly what we're talking about - in a Christian marriage, each partner is directed to respect the wishes of the other
Just thought you should hear it from someone you love and respect.you win again!
Spoiler
dude - you're just awesome! :first:
now be a good boy and go away
A spouse imposing sex on the other is not a 'hideous violation of another human being'.
None of you have been able to explain otherwise, you all are just making the blanket statement that 'rape is bad' and that's it. You may as well copy and paste it rather than give yourself carpal tunnel
It is and here's the rational litmus: if you have to know if they're married to distinguish the act from a rape, it's a rape.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Only a moron would use such simplistic throwaway terms like 'getting over it' & 'dwelling on it' with regards to trauma.
So no surprise they were posted by you then really.
You know nothing about the effects of rape so take your sad little act someplace else you boring little troll. Honestly, how are you not even boring yourself with this tedious act yet?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
A spouse imposing sex on the other is not a 'hideous violation of another human being'.
None of you have been able to explain otherwise, you all are just making the blanket statement that 'rape is bad' and that's it. You may as well copy and paste it rather than give yourself carpal tunnel
Well if it isn't Captain Rolleyes...
You are a misogynistic little nut and just as boring as SOD...
Well if it isn't Captain Rolleyes...
You are a misogynistic little nut and just as boring as SOD...
Ah
So that's why you all perpetuate lies, it's much more fun than plain old truths
Also
It shouldn't even be called 'rolleyes', it's more of a sarcastic face. That's why I use it :chuckle:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Ah
So that's why you all perpetuate lies, it's much more fun than plain old truths
Do you wear a tin foil hat to bed? Otherwise this is just yet more unsubstantiated babbling, kind of a common trait with you. The reason why most don't see things the same as you is because that's not the way things actually are, your woman hatred notwithstanding.
Then put a post it note on your mirror then. You're a fruitcake with a whole load of nuts in the mix...
Interplanner
Well-known member
I always gag when I see this title, so I hope you will participate at "This Week's Male-Female Hour the best ever"
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
not sure why you'd say that, except for your antagonism towards me and anybody who dares to disagree with you on this subject :idunno:
artie said:
have you ever been raped artie?
i clipped the rest of your girly rant
YOU know nothing about the effects of rape, only what you've been told. Ever find it funny that a man raped by a woman would not be traumatized for life?
Why is that :think:
It's one of those funny damn questions that nobody is capable of really answering. And it's all too obvious why.
Rape seemed to have a far less impact on women up until the feminist movement- but don't let reality hinder your idolatry of them.
I've never been crucified. All I know about it is what I've been told. All most people know about any number of things is what they're told.
I don't think rape is funny no matter who is on the victim's end of it. Though a man is much more likely to be raped by another man. I suspect being penetrated is more psychologically damaging, but I'm not going to assume that a man, raped, simply isn't damaged by it or speculate on the degree or duration of the damage.
But then, I'm not trying to advance an irrational, emotional grudge, so don't let me stop you.
Why is what? Why is your undemonstrated assumption to set up another witless attack on women something worth considering? Why indeed.
It's an assumption with peculiar punctuation that happens so rarely it's not much discussed by anyone.
I think something is all too obvious. And here it comes.
Like most of what you say about women and rape, there's no reason for anyone, literally anyone to believe it.
- Status