Facebook Muslims react to London terror with joy

[glorydaz]

I sure wish a psychologist could do a case study on the way you follow TH around, so they could examine your behavior when it comes to him. It would be fascinating.

As if Town doesn't follow Doser around. :chuckle:

 

[glorydaz]

I wrote: No, it isn't. You just don't know how to meet it rationally so you do this in lieu of putting yourself in a position to be embarrassed by your presumption.

There's literally nothing wrong with the grammar and I dialed it down sufficiently so that the grade reading level required to understand it without any difficulty is around the senior year of high school (the fog index came in at 12.67, so a sharp, college ready senior then). But if you're having trouble all you have to do is say so and I'll happily break it into something more digestible for you.

Nothing condescending about that. :ha:


What isn't digestible is your ego. :vomit:

 

[ok doser]

I wrote: No, it isn't. You just don't know how to meet it rationally so you do this in lieu of putting yourself in a position to be embarrassed by your presumption

There's literally nothing wrong with the grammar ...

well, yes, there is

you don't define your terms, to start

i bolded them - undefined, they make it impossible to understand

 

[annabenedetti]

My guess is that he has a circle of friends/ associates that are social clones of each other.

:freak:

 

[ClimateSanity]

I almost expect to see town in a gray powdered wig with white face and a fake mole on his cheek.

Sent from my XT1254 using TheologyOnline mobile app

 

[annabenedetti]

well, no

you don't define your terms, to start

i bolded them - undefined, they make it impossible to understand

Since you used "supra" the other day after making an issue of TH using it, you really have no room to whine about the words he chooses. :chuckle:

 

[annabenedetti]

I almost expect to see town in a gray powdered wig with white face and a fake mole on his cheek.

What are you trying to do, impress sod?

 

[Town Heretic]

I've known lawyers who were not high-minded and condescending, so I don't think he can use that as an excuse.

High minded is typically used to note strong moral value or principle and condescension tends to be a good bit like beauty. Your problem, again, is that you're incapable of valuing any opinion that you don't share or originate and if the issue is important to you that approach extends to the person holding it. That's what devalues both your regard and critique. That's what made your exchange with Cruc's shadow funny. You two deciding if you liked one another by virtue of that litmus.

 

[ok doser]

Since you used "supra" the other day ....

i rarely have an opportunity to, except to use in ridiculing mr pretentious :banana:

 

[annabenedetti]

i rarely have an opportunity to, except to use in ridiculing mr pretentious :banana:

Oh, you used it quite naturally, and it was hilarious when I posted back your own cackling to TH about using it. :chuckle:

 

[ok doser]

... a fake mole on his cheek.

i picture him with a live raccoon clinging to his face

 

[ok doser]

Oh, you used it quite naturally...

yes, as i said, i rarely have an opportunity to use it appropriately

in that case, the other day, it served both purposes



with the added bonus of outing your sycophantic OCD

 

[Town Heretic]

well, yes, there is

You don't know what you're talking about. Cite to the rule and run that through any grammar check you like.

No, let me...I use a service to check longer academic works, prowritingaid.com and let's see what it has to say.

No, no grammar issues, though it tells me I could have lost "just" and used instead where I went with "in lieu".

i bolded them - undefined, they make it impossible to understand

They exist in a context that shouldn't allow for confusion. I'm not writing to someone happening by or in on the conversation.

i picture him with a live raccoon clinging to his face

lain:

 

[annabenedetti]

yes, as i said, i rarely have an opportunity to use it appropriately

in that case, the other day, it served both purposes



with the added bonus of outing your sycophantic OCD

Keep spinning that spin. We both know better. :chuckle:

 

[Town Heretic]

Nothing condescending about that. :ha:

There actually isn't, which makes it a great way to underscore my point about that judgement being a good bit like beauty.

What isn't digestible is your ego.

Like getting advice on how to grill ribs from Gandhi.

 

[ok doser]

... I could have lost "just"

yes, it was unnecessary

and used instead where I went with "in lieu".

"instead of" just wouldn't have been nearly as pretentious as "in lieu of"

They exist in a context that shouldn't allow for confusion.

define what you mean by "your presumption"

 

[ClimateSanity]

i picture him with a live raccoon clinging to his face

That's close to what i was referring to.

Sent from my XT1254 using TheologyOnline mobile app

 

[ok doser]

That's close to what i was referring to.

Sent from my XT1254 using TheologyOnline mobile app

don't let acw see that pretty man - he'll have the vapours

 

[ClimateSanity]

Hahahaha

Sent from my XT1254 using TheologyOnline mobile app

 

[Town Heretic]

yes, it was unnecessary

Writing isn't only about what is "necessary".

"instead of" wouldn't have been nearly as pretentious as "in lieu of"

You just called a grammar program pretentious.

define what you mean by "your presumption"

No. You don't warrant it. Your conduct doesn't warrant this much, but when you decided to label a professional writing program pretentious I felt obliged.