Ironic that Stipe is calling people morons, and then conflates "evolutionist" and "atheist."
Dumber than a ditch catfish, he is.
Dumber than a ditch catfish, he is.
Evolutionists are morons.
- Thread starter Stripe
- Start date
- Status
What? When do you think scientists taught that the Earth was flat?
Relax. Ipestay's otnay ootay ightbray, if you know what I mean.
Brainless, do you know what you're saying, 'cause I don't? Are you saying that it's the job of peer reviewers to automatically reject anything that doesn't fall within the generally accepted model? Or, are you saying that it's the job of peer reviewers to scrutinize the particular theories put forth within papers and then reject those papers of the reviewer doesn't think the paper has proven its theory?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Oh geez...scientific theories are constantly under scrutiny, that's part of the point. Unless you believe in a global "politically correct" conspiracy to subvert the 'truth' then evolutionary theory would have been falsified long since. As it is it constantly undergoes due process and modifications despite being established as the 'accepted model'. You probably confuse that as well. All you've done with the above is to confirm you have no actual idea how peer review actually works...
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Some folk still believe the earth is flat, there's even a forum for them: http://theflatearthsociety.org/cms/
They'd probably think you and Stipe are morons for not 'realizing' it apparently is...though what would you suppose their claims have to do with actual science?
Evolution and an old earth aren't the 'enemy' to anything apart from a rigid unthinking dogmatic belief system.
Ya, and they're all evolutionists. :chuckle:
Snob appeal!
Lordkalvan
New member
Banana Man? You are kidding, right?
Sure they did go read the history books, they used to burn folk at the stake if they stepped out of line....the bible always did say the earth turns on it's circuits.
These days Nasa is telling folks that their underarm sprays are what causes the violent weather patterns we see. Yes that came from Nasa, they wouldn't want you to think anything THEY are doing is destroying the ozone. Man there are trillions of dollars at stake.
Such stupidity...these are the wisest people on the planet. God help us.
Can't you deny that the hard evidence for man's whole history is there under our feet in solid bone?...it goes no further than 8, thousand years and probably less. Can't you deny that population and movement of people strongly support a single parentage?
This is scientific evidence, if you deny it you have to go into speculation which is exactly what evolution theory always was.
Lordkalvan
New member
Who would 'they' be?
For example? I have spent some time arguing with YECs elsewhere who argue precisely the opposite.
Citation?
So what are NASA doing, then?
What makes you think they 'are the wisest people on the planet'?
Lordkalvan
New member
Well, that's funny because I live near to a number of Magdalen Culture sites (la Grotte de Niaux, for example) that date back at least 50% longer than that.
What do you mean by 'a single parentage'?
Er, no, it wasn't (and isn't).
Nasa are doing two things 1st they have been burning holes in the ozone for decades while blaming us for using underarm sprays...people are so gullible they believe everything the scientists say. 2nd they are burning trillions of dollars worth of honest hard working American's taxes. Cancel Nasa and cancel America's debt...at a stroke.
There has never been any human remains dated beyond 10, 000 years old....there are plenty there, all in layers under our feet, every generation that ever lived, every age of man. It's all there compadre. How he has progressed is all there in hard solid form from stone age to the present day. It is this rock solid evidence which even schoolboys know about that the evolutionis must pretend doesn't exist.
Single parentage is easily discovered because that is what the hard solid evidence shows...waal ok not single parentage per se but look here.
The population on every continent and in every nation shows the expansion of mankind from a central location. Everyone agrees upon that though they might disagree where that location is.
Britain today has a population of 70 millions, 500 years ago it was 5 millions 1,000 years ago 1 million so by reversing the evidence you can discern how the human race has multiplied from a tiny number and spread out throughout the earth. It is perfectly logical to think that this tiny number is two or a single parentage.
There has never been any human remains dated beyond 10, 000 years old....there are plenty there, all in layers under our feet, every generation that ever lived, every age of man. It's all there compadre. How he has progressed is all there in hard solid form from stone age to the present day. It is this rock solid evidence which even schoolboys know about that the evolutionis must pretend doesn't exist.
Single parentage is easily discovered because that is what the hard solid evidence shows...waal ok not single parentage per se but look here.
The population on every continent and in every nation shows the expansion of mankind from a central location. Everyone agrees upon that though they might disagree where that location is.
Britain today has a population of 70 millions, 500 years ago it was 5 millions 1,000 years ago 1 million so by reversing the evidence you can discern how the human race has multiplied from a tiny number and spread out throughout the earth. It is perfectly logical to think that this tiny number is two or a single parentage.
Sure evolution is speculation, anything without scientific evidence is speculation.
Lordkalvan
New member
Simply reasserting your claim without the requested citation does not make it any more substantive than it was before. NASA's 2013 budget is about one-third what the US spends on pets every year. Just think how many more problems could be solved by getting rid of pets.
Well, I've just referred you to some that have been:
'Magdalenian Girl is the common name for a skeleton of an early modern human dating from 13,000 to 11,000 BCE, in the Magdalenian period. The remains were discovered in 1911 in southwestern France in the Cap Blanc rock shelter.'
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magdalenian_Girl
Um, the last time I checked out the palaeontology section of a natural history museum, this evidence was pretty much a central feature of its displays. How are your 'evolutionists' pretending it 'doesn't exist'?
Do you have a relevant citation?
Maybe logical, but wholly wrong: populations evolve, not individuals.
Lordkalvan
New member
But there is evidence for evolution. Consider, for example, this site:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/search/topicbrowse2.php?topic_id=46
Ol wighty is on board 
Carbon dating ain't what it used to be is it? 13,000 the best they can do huh with an room for error of 2, 000 years...doesn't give me any confidence as to it's accuracy.....especially in the light of all the previous failed discoveries.
Are you denying the population of Britain was 5 mill in the 16th century or 1 mill in the 11th what? this is schoolboy history and the same is true of every nation in every continent. Populations evolve you say.
Well as I read Job who lived at least 4, 000 years ago and maybe more I see no evolution nor any in the tribes who lived in Abraham's day. Egyptians then look pretty much like Egyptians today...whatever natural evolution occurs there is no fundamental evolution of species.
Carbon dating ain't what it used to be is it? 13,000 the best they can do huh with an room for error of 2, 000 years...doesn't give me any confidence as to it's accuracy.....especially in the light of all the previous failed discoveries.
Are you denying the population of Britain was 5 mill in the 16th century or 1 mill in the 11th what? this is schoolboy history and the same is true of every nation in every continent. Populations evolve you say.
Well as I read Job who lived at least 4, 000 years ago and maybe more I see no evolution nor any in the tribes who lived in Abraham's day. Egyptians then look pretty much like Egyptians today...whatever natural evolution occurs there is no fundamental evolution of species.
There is none...if there was evidence all the speculation would cease. The man who found the evidence would be mighty famous and VERY rich overnight.
Go public today proclaim to the world that you have the evidence...it is what the whole world is waiting for.
- Status