| Lenny Pozner used to believe in conspiracy theories. Until his son’s death became one. |
I will read it, and no I don't believe in a flat earth but I have credible doubts about putting men on the moon. I have a healthy skepticism and I don't trust msm. Too many unanswered questions and violations of established protocols.
The application of fact and reason will always lead you to the more probable conclusion. Historically, very little of what passes through the ranks of conspiracy theorists meets this litmus, which is why so very few conspiracies are ultimately more than a confederation of like minded paranoia predicated on distortion and isolated facts.
Yep, it's the rage to chip away at our constitutional rights of speech, gun rights and morals. Thanks for taking interest in this thread as you're the biggest proponent of more gun laws here. You shouldn't be worried or concerned about delusional rantings of conspiracy theories. I know, you're here to help people who might "stumble" across such craziness and non-conformity. I encourage folks to seek the truth and draw their own conclusions.
Great, you've told us what reasonable people will certainly think IF they search the facts that DO have access to. Reasonable people know that the government and the media are honest and open, we all get the whole truth and the world is relatively safe except for these mass shooters and terrorists everywhere.
You may have doubts, but they are not credible and your inability to recognize something that fundamental should give pause to anyone giving your willingness to embrace conspiracy theory of other stripes. Healthy skepticism is rooted in rationality, in the verifiable and in facts that can be tested. The willingness to doubt isn't that in itself. So much of human endeavor undoes any serious attempt to lend credibility to the monumental and ongoing effort a fake moon landing would entail as to surpass any actual conspiracy in application from the dawn of mankind.
Rather, you have an unhealthy want of skepticism when it comes to the people who sold you the notion of a unified mainstream media and the conspiracy that entails. An unhealthy skepticism evidenced by your failure at this late date in your life to be settled on something as unproblematic as the moon landing.
Not if you're actually looking for answers, instead of reasons to believe something else.
Your investment shows when you make summations that don't sum. I haven't suggested that the government is open or always honest. I haven't suggested that there's a unified thing called the media, because I know better and you should too. That media tag covers a large number of diverse outlets with their own agendas and filters, from Fox to the BBC. And the broader you cast your net the more you understand the unifying truths they tell, and where the devil is often found, from detail to selection in presentation. I'm for a healthy skepticism. That's not what you're advancing with your lump sum paranoia and dismissal.
Let me guess, you'll be a fixture in this thread now to spout your "group think", liberal and highly educated analysis of and the psychology of delusional conspiracy theory "type" people. Why do you care if unreported facts are reported? Focus on football and gun laws.
Other people have listed sources and it's not my job to source images on the internet. Do you ask where jgarden gets his cartoons? I searched David Wheeler images and copied/pasted the image. The real footage also appears in videos, many removed now by youtube. Some actual footage videos still exist.
Rather, it's the rage to believe that this is what's happening. What's actually happening is the continued evolution of right in relation where we don't simply accept the authority of tradition as an argument and reject tradition that rests entirely on that premise as being somehow inviolate.
I'm certainly one of them, though I wouldn't say we so much need more as different.
If the people demonstrated a more serious approach to truth and reason I wouldn't be. But the number of people willing to buy into nonsense predicated on rhetoric has me investing in an open, voiced skepticism and reminder.
To which I'd add the litmus for reaching those conclusions is paramount.
You're advocating a lot of dangerously underthought nonsense as reasonable, PJ. I'm not around much these days, but I do mean to remind people that they owe it to themselves to throw a wide net, gather facts, be particular and demanding in the testing of any claim, and to demand that extraordinary claims are supported by extraordinary, observable, testable, confirmable fact.
I've gotten the attention of few "rational" reasonable logic based members. Liberals don't like free thinking or free speech.
Watch the videos, or don't. That's what this thread is my fellow citizen. I suspect you'll spend a bit more time here. How is what I post dangerous, oh great legal mind?
You're doing a bit more than just posting videos. Initially I thought you were joking. I told you what the danger here was and remains. If you don't understand you don't mean to and that may be part of the problem.
Talking to yourself instead of answering particular rebuttal is probably how you just know you're right, eh PJ?
lain: And slathering liberal over it is a near conspiracy theory in itself.
Here's one debunking of a similar actor claim: https://www.snopes.com/same-girl-crying-now-oregon/ along with photographs of the actual women some doofi were claiming to be one person.
I've seen the actual footage of him acting on film in movies and/or TV shows. His wife was an actor on a children's show and I saw the footage. It is documented and fact that they were both actors and/or in performing arts. All the parents recently moved there. Did their names change? I have no idea.