climate hockey stick defeated

marke

Well-known member
Use this:

In August, Chris Cherry, a professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, salvaged a large volume from a stack of vintage journals that a fellow faculty member was about to toss out. He was drawn to a 1966 copy of the industry publication Mining Congress Journal; his father-in-law had been in the industry and he thought it might be an interesting memento. Cherry flipped it open to a passage from James R. Garvey, who was the president of Bituminous Coal Research Inc., a now-defunct coal mining and processing research organization.
“There is evidence that the amount of carbon dioxide in the earth’s atmosphere is increasing rapidly as a result of the combustion of fossil fuels,” wrote Garvey. “If the future rate of increase continues as it is at the present, it has been predicted that, because the CO2 envelope reduces radiation, the temperature of the earth’s atmosphere will increase and that vast changes in the climates of the earth will result.”
“Such changes in temperature will cause melting of the polar icecaps, which, in turn, would result in the inundation of many coastal cities, including New York and London,” he continued.
Source: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/coal...YL0lmNptuiUSzKTJwtAJDmmM-PgQCF9w-eHfK2RCR4IfI
You found another speculator who feared future global warming might do bad things to the planet. Keep looking. I bet you can find thousands of speculators with the same irrational fears.
 

marke

Well-known member
Speaking of lies...

If you’ve been cruising the denial highway over the past week or so, you may have come to believe that Dr. Michael Mann has lost his defamation lawsuit--the British Columbia court ruled in favor of Canadian Tim Ball and forced Mann to pay Ball’s court costs. Deniers are also claiming that the hockey stick graph, which Mann supposedly refused to release the data for, has now been broken and ruled a fraud...Despite the victory laps from O’Sullivan and the rest, the judge didn’t rule in favor of Ball in the Mann case. Rather, the court dismissed the case on the basis that it has dragged on and been delayed for so long...In a statement responding to the wave of false coverage, Mann clarified that the “Court did not find that any of Ball’s defenses were valid. The Court did not find that any of my claims were *not* valid… The provision in the Court’s order relating to costs does NOT mean that I will pay Ball’s legal fees… In making his application based on delay, Ball effectively told the world he did not want a verdict on the real issues in the lawsuit.”

In reality, the court tossed the case in what appears to be an act of pity for Tim Ball. As a statement from Mann’s lawyer explained, Ball’s request to terminate the lawsuit “relied heavily on his alleged state of health” and because, per Ball’s defense team, his claims are “given no credibility by the average, reasonable reader.” (An assessment bolstered by the fact that in a similar suit, a judge ruled that “a reasonably thoughtful and informed person… is unlikely to place any stock in Dr. Ball’s views.”)

On the health front, the plea to toss the case notes that Ball, born in 1938, “suffered coronary heart failure” in 2017, after “quintuple bypass surgery” ten years prior, in addition to having Type 2 Diabetes. Apparently being old is a defense?

What this all means: no, the court didn’t rule that Mann’s hockey stick was a fraud. And no, it has nothing to do with Mann supposedly refusing to release the data for deniers to double check. Again, Mann took to Twitter to explain that “The ‘Hockey Stick’ data & code are all available & have been for more than a decade,” with a link to the FTP site that’s hosted the data since, by the looks of it, at least 2003.

And for whether or not the hockey stick, showing a rapid increase in temperatures in the modern era, has broken, Mann points out that multiple other teams have come to the same general conclusion.

Far from being a clear win for the deniers, the ruling appears to be more a judgement of the state of Tim Ball: a broken down old man, who’s lucky that no one takes his conspiratorial and accusatory ramblings seriously.

And that’s what his own defense said about him!

Source: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...clares-Victory
Try this.

 

way 2 go

Well-known member
Looks like something Hollywood might claim came out of the containment building of a hot nuclear reactor. Take my word for it, nobody glows coming out of the containment area of a hot nuclear reactor.

Emerald Robinson

Allow me to share my secret and very profound methodology:

1) I went to the MODERNA website.

2) I clicked to the PATENTS page.

3) I found PATENT US 10,703,789

4) I conducted a keyword search for something called: Luciferase.
 

way 2 go

Well-known member

  • In 1970, they claimed there would be an Ice Age by 2000. Contrary to what people tell you today, this was not an outlier. This was the widely accepted "science" and reporting of the day. SOURCES: YouTube, WaPo, WhiteHouse, Guardian, Time
  • TRUTH: No Ice Age in 2000--it was the 14th warmest year on record. SOURCE: Weather.gov
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: A "mini Ice Age" could hit earth by 2030! SOURCE: ScienceNatures
  • In 1970, Life magazine claimed people would have to wear gas masks for pollution by 1985! SOURCE: AEI
  • TRUTH: Not unless you're in Beijing, and even so, people wear surgical masks.
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: Covid masks will cause record levels of waste in the oceans! SOURCE: WorldEconomicForum
  • In 1989, it was claimed that rising sea levels would drown countries by 2000!


image.jpg




  • TRUTH: Have any countries drowned?
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: Florida will be drowned by 2060! SOURCE: TheGuardian
  • PREDICTION: In 1988, Bob Reis predicted Lower Manhattan would be underwater by 2018. SOURCE: SalonArchive
  • TRUTH: Yes, but not for reasons they thought… SOURCE: NYPost
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: NYC will be underwater by 2050! SOURCE: TheTravel.com
  • PREDICTION: IN 1988, officials claimed that the Maldives would be underwater in the next 30 years. SOURCE: AgenceFrancePresse
  • TRUTH: 30 Years later, a record 1.48 million tourists visited the Maldives. SOURCE: MaldivesAssociationForTourismIndustry
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: The Maldives could disappear by the end of the century. SOURCE: CNBC
  • PREDICTION: In 2000, children won't know what snow is by 2020! SOURCE: IndependentArchive
  • TRUTH: Do your children know what snow is?
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: In 2040, the UK won't have snow anymore! SOURCE: NatureWorldNews
  • PREDICTION: In 2004, a Pentagon report warned the UK climate would be like Siberia by 2020! OVERLAY TheGuardian
  • TRUTH: In 2020, the UK's climate included record-breaking rainfall, record dry and sunny periods, and a summer heatwave. SOURCE: CarbonBrief
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: 10 areas of the UK could be underwater by 2050 because of rising sea levels! SOURCE: CountryLiving
  • PREDICTION: In 2009, Al Gore said there would be no more ice in the Arctic by 2013! SOURCES: YouTube
  • TRUTH: In 2013, Arctic ice measured 2.25 million square miles Compared to 2012, 1.67 million square miles. SOURCE: Nasa.gov
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: Arctic sea ice could be gone by 2035! SOURCE:
 

way 2 go

Well-known member

marke

Well-known member

Dozens of Ships Stuck in Arctic as Ice Freezes Early, Contradicting Global Warming Claims​

Maybe Biden can send Fauci and Cameltoe down there to try to find out what is causing the icing problem.

142945_600.jpg
 

ffreeloader

Well-known member

  • In 1970, they claimed there would be an Ice Age by 2000. Contrary to what people tell you today, this was not an outlier. This was the widely accepted "science" and reporting of the day. SOURCES: YouTube, WaPo, WhiteHouse, Guardian, Time
  • TRUTH: No Ice Age in 2000--it was the 14th warmest year on record. SOURCE: Weather.gov
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: A "mini Ice Age" could hit earth by 2030! SOURCE: ScienceNatures
  • In 1970, Life magazine claimed people would have to wear gas masks for pollution by 1985! SOURCE: AEI
  • TRUTH: Not unless you're in Beijing, and even so, people wear surgical masks.
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: Covid masks will cause record levels of waste in the oceans! SOURCE: WorldEconomicForum
  • In 1989, it was claimed that rising sea levels would drown countries by 2000!


image.jpg




  • TRUTH: Have any countries drowned?
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: Florida will be drowned by 2060! SOURCE: TheGuardian
  • PREDICTION: In 1988, Bob Reis predicted Lower Manhattan would be underwater by 2018. SOURCE: SalonArchive
  • TRUTH: Yes, but not for reasons they thought… SOURCE: NYPost
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: NYC will be underwater by 2050! SOURCE: TheTravel.com
  • PREDICTION: IN 1988, officials claimed that the Maldives would be underwater in the next 30 years. SOURCE: AgenceFrancePresse
  • TRUTH: 30 Years later, a record 1.48 million tourists visited the Maldives. SOURCE: MaldivesAssociationForTourismIndustry
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: The Maldives could disappear by the end of the century. SOURCE: CNBC
  • PREDICTION: In 2000, children won't know what snow is by 2020! SOURCE: IndependentArchive
  • TRUTH: Do your children know what snow is?
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: In 2040, the UK won't have snow anymore! SOURCE: NatureWorldNews
  • PREDICTION: In 2004, a Pentagon report warned the UK climate would be like Siberia by 2020! OVERLAY TheGuardian
  • TRUTH: In 2020, the UK's climate included record-breaking rainfall, record dry and sunny periods, and a summer heatwave. SOURCE: CarbonBrief
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: 10 areas of the UK could be underwater by 2050 because of rising sea levels! SOURCE: CountryLiving
  • PREDICTION: In 2009, Al Gore said there would be no more ice in the Arctic by 2013! SOURCES: YouTube
  • TRUTH: In 2013, Arctic ice measured 2.25 million square miles Compared to 2012, 1.67 million square miles. SOURCE: Nasa.gov
  • UPDATED PREDICTION: Arctic sea ice could be gone by 2035! SOURCE:
New study shows islands are actually rising and growing in land mass in spite of "global warming".

 

User Name

Well-known member

Emerald Robinson

Allow me to share my secret and very profound methodology:

1) I went to the MODERNA website.

2) I clicked to the PATENTS page.

3) I found PATENT US 10,703,789

4) I conducted a keyword search for something called: Luciferase.
 

ok doser

Well-known member

Dozens of Ships Stuck in Arctic as Ice Freezes Early, Contradicting Global Warming Claims​

No no no no no no no

ANY weather event, whether expected or not, is ALWAYS proof of global warming!
 

way 2 go

Well-known member

Yachts To Be Exempt From EU's Carbon Pricing Plan​


If there is anyone still confused why ESG, and the entire "green" movement is one giant, boiling cauldron of lies, hypocrisy and fraud, read on.

Last summer, we reported that the European Commission - that murder of career bureaucrats - has proposed exempting private jets, the one most polluting form of transportation, from the planned EU jet fuel tax. A draft indicated that the tax would be phased-in for passenger flights, including ones that carry cargo. Private jets will enjoy an exemption through classification of "business aviation" as the use of aircraft by firms for carriage of passengers or goods as an "aid to the conduct of their business", if generally considered not for public hire. It gets better: a further exemption is given for "pleasure" flights whereby an aircraft is used for "personal or recreational" purposes not associated with a business or professional use.

This is odd because a recent report found that private-jet CO2 emissions in Europe rose by 31% between 2005 and 2019, with flights to popular destinations up markedly during summer holiday seasons. So if Europe was truly concerned about curbing CO2 emissions it would ostensibly go after some of the biggest culprits... but no.

European Commission published a set of proposals to decarbonize the maritime sector. However, what quietly not mentioned, is that the proposed carbon pricing scheme (ETS) and the low GHG fuel standard (FuelEU Maritime) will only apply to ships above 5,000 GT and exclude a number of ship types such as offshore vessels, fishing vessels and.... yachts.

It appears that a size threshold was implemented after the fact precisely the allow yachts to be among the vessels exempt from the regulation. The problem is that by setting the threshold so high, ships accounting for nearly 20% of the EU’s shipping emissions - would be exemplt, double what the Commission originally claimed the exemption would cover.




the "useful idiots " still think its about "climate change™ "
 
Top