ClimateSanity
New member
Thanks.
Anybody else sick of the supposed race issue?
- Thread starter Poly
- Start date
Thanks.
Jews have been oppressed for over five thousand years, and every race has encountered it's time of enslavement. There was white slavery while American slavery was going on, but because it's not actually about slavery- and rather about a pass to prejudice, nobody cares about that.
'Reality' is not being indebted to a people, who were never enslaved, because your dead ancestors may have been slavers. That is 'madness', and those such as yourself should be charged and incarcerated every time a white person is transgressed against by another with that mindset.
And
The only thing black people are paranoid of is themselves.
If I yelled this down the street, I'd be called racist, because society isn't living in 'reality'. Like you, it is 'madness' to say that a black man's worst fear is ANOTHER BLACK MAN.
You didn't ... nor do I believe that Rex believes a parent should put their happiness above their child's. A child's living environment is only as healthy as that of his parent(s)/caregivers.
Here's what he actually said:
That's not severe? Seems pretty severe to me. You can't always recognize the jerks right away. But lets just blame the women by default. It's probably her fault.
So...divorce is bad because it let people out of marriages...
...and even if there's physical abuse, there should be no getting out of it. And the family should be forced to have him back, albeit with "supervision". That's not severe?
Families that are happy are some kind of fairy tale? That's not severe?
And that's why I reacted the way I did. Who decides what's best for the family? Is it the adults? No. Is it the kids? Not really. Who decides? He does. And he expects that parents will do as he wishes no matter how miserable it is. It's a recipe for misery.
I'm not sure how that helps him.
Exactly ... plus there are certain violations that, IMO, should never be tolerated in a marriage ... by either partner. It is not in the children's best interest to view one of his/her parents as a willing victim of domestic abuse or adultery. Acceptance by that parent tells the child that such behavior is what should be expected and repeated in their own relationships.
You think I've been kidnapped by women and have fallen in love with them?
:rotfl:
Well, all I can really say is that it's pretty clear that hasn't happened to you.
What gibberish is this :chuckle:
Stockholm's Syndrome- a psychological phenomenon in which hostages express empathy and sympathy and have positive feelings toward their captors, sometimes to the point of defending and identifying with the captors
You liberals are the torch runners in this sport, I swear.
And
There's only one way to describe a person who sees being feminist minded as a necessity in 'getting a girl'.
See definition above :rotfl:
:chuckle:
Just for the record, feminism has nothing to do with "getting a girl". Feminism is about what's right.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
PureX
Well-known member
As far as we know, the Jews were never enslaved, anywhere, ever. (The biblical story in Exodus has never been corroborated, and is unlikely to be true as ancient Egypt did not use slaves.) White slavery has occurred on occasion, but very rarely in modern history. People with dark skin, however, have been enslaved in massive numbers and in very recent history. - A simple truth that you are trying very hard to deny because you are trying to justify the lies of bigots.
Madness is fretting and sputtering about a reparation issue that is not an issue in any reality in which we are living. No one is holding you responsible for slavery. We're only holding you responsible for your willful ignorance and subsequent dishonesty regarding the racial prejudice that exists, today, and that is doing harm to many of your fellow human beings.
I think it's safe to say that black people know better what they are afraid of than you do. Especially when you practice willful ignorance on the scale that you do. But of course your willful ignorance is equaled by your arrogance, and so here you are, spouting off your nonsensical gibberish just the same.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
you, sir, are a retard
also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonian_captivity
purex said:
:doh:
wiki said:
purex said:
are you black?
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
i'll get to it , i'll get to it
multitasking at the moment - got terminator genysis streaming and trying to find illegal source pdf files for my textbooks
I refuse to even have this discussion, as it's just rank annoyance dealing with people who find excuses for everything to justify their ridiculous, Stockholm ridden liberalism.
They have resorted to
-denying that Egypt ever had slaves
-minimize any other slavery (American slavery was actually mild in comparison)
-deny that blacks exclude themselves for any reason other than fearing other people (which is straight up nonsense, they are simply culturally different and, in some cases, prejudice themselves)
-etc. etc. etc. (I could go on, but a waste of time is a waste of time)
I'll be surprised if they even quote this entire post, and not just the first half and declare some bogus victory.
Because that's what it all is- a big farce masquerading as something other than just base discontent for REALITY
They have resorted to
-denying that Egypt ever had slaves
-minimize any other slavery (American slavery was actually mild in comparison)
-deny that blacks exclude themselves for any reason other than fearing other people (which is straight up nonsense, they are simply culturally different and, in some cases, prejudice themselves)
-etc. etc. etc. (I could go on, but a waste of time is a waste of time)
I'll be surprised if they even quote this entire post, and not just the first half and declare some bogus victory.
Because that's what it all is- a big farce masquerading as something other than just base discontent for REALITY
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
now, to be fair, most of that is purex and he's always been recognized around here as being, well....
special
I said I wasn't on board with everything he said. This is part of it because of the emphasis on the woman while ignoring the man. It reminds me a bit of that misogynist group leader that satirically said we could lessen rape by legalizing it on private grounds because women would be more careful. Remove the ability for a single mother to survive and they'll be more careful.
But a couple things. First, the context was a woman because your initial hypothetical was a single mother on SNAP. Second, is this true: in most break-ups that involve children it is the mother that gets custody. If so, then the sad truth might be that women/mothers have more to think about, but it isn't simply because women need to make better choices.
'easy divorce'.
This was the other part I didn't like. 'Should' is too strong. And if there is abuse then I don't think staying would be better for the child either. I don't want to discount the possibility for genuine change though and CS might have been focusing on that.
'blissful'.
:idunno:
Because being in a family changes what the pursuit of happiness entails.
My impression is that you and him are putting emphasis on opposite sides of the spectrum. You picture completely miserable and/or abusive relationships where a woman is pressured to stay or unable to leave and he's picturing couples splitting up for minor things at the expense of their children (the abusive part of it notwithstanding). Neither is good.