31 Reasons To Reject The Jab

[Nick M]

You will like this headline. HIV

COVID-19 vaccination and HIV-1 acquisition​

In the end, we still do not know what caused the slightly increased HIV-1 infection rates in HAdV-5 seropositive men in the STEP and Phambili trials. However, it is important to note that the increase in HIV-1 infection in these studies was only observed in very small numbers of individuals.

 

[Nick M]

This one is from Nature.com. It got enough traction that the propaganda machine went up against it.

Results​

mRNA vaccines induce HIV reactivation ex vivo with minimal T-cell activation​

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induces transient systemic innate immune responses in vivo, which include the activation of TLR, RIG-I, and other inflammatory signaling pathways, providing potential latency reversal stimuli25,26,27.

 

[Nick M]

This has nothing to do with the jab in and of itself. I just want to rub it in.

 

[Ps82]

Most of my life I was a very trusting person. So many reasons now not to trust ... but depend on the LORD God to have given us the truth even about how wrong multiple sexual encounters are stupid.

I trusted any vaccine that was offered. The first time I felt mistrust was when I had to have a flu shot to enter college. I did not want to take it but did because my college required it.

Now, I am very concerned about all the vaccines that are given to our babies! About what these might be doing to our children as they grow. We have so many emotionally challenged children these days. Something has caused it. I thank Mr. Kennedy for stepping up to try to solves some of the harmful things we are taking into our bodies. May our Lord be with him. Amen.

 

[Nick M]

I trusted any vaccine that was offered.

Even the flu? That one never made sense.

 

[way 2 go]

☕️ THE HARD WAY ☙ Saturday, January 10, 2026 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠

Trump hammers credit-card usury; markets jump on a mortgage-bond tweet; tariff & tax refunds teased; affordability EO for homebuyers; PBS cuts news; Greenland threat hardens; & cancer study detonates.

substack.com

Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

The newly published (January 3rd), peer-reviewed study in Oncotarget does something that was functionally forbidden for four years: it systematically catalogs cancer cases temporally associated with covid vaccination and covid infection, then asks —carefully, explicitly— whether mRNA might plausibly connect the dots.

The first reason is that the study’s authors aren’t fringe figures or Twitter gadflies. Dr. Charlotte Kuperwasser is a senior cancer biologist at Tufts University whose work focuses on tumor microenvironments, metastasis, and immune–cancer interactions. Dr. Wafik S. El-Deiry is a longtime oncologist and molecular cancer researcher at Brown University, former president of the American Association for Cancer Research, and a leading authority on p53 signaling and cancer therapeutics.

In other words, these are scientists whose day jobs are spotting early cancer signals— not making them up for clicks. And they know the game. The paper took a year to traverse peer review and be published— including 5 months of silence following acceptance.

The second, and perhaps bigger reason, is that the two researchers didn’t conduct a new experiment that could be sliced and diced by Big Pharma’s stable of pet critics. Instead, they reviewed 69 other peer-reviewed publications from 27 different countries, covering 333 patients, plus several large population-level datasets, and proved recurring patterns that simply cannot be waved away:

• unusually rapid cancer progression,
• reactivation of previously controlled disease,
• odd tumor clusters near injection sites or draining lymph nodes, and
• a striking overrepresentation of lymphomas, leukemias, aggressive solid tumors, and virus-associated cancers.

In other words, to criticize this peer-reviewed paper, Big Pharma’s slander team would have to criticize the 69 previous peer-reviewed papers, too. A project like that would look a lot like outright persecution and not Science™. Hence, the DDOS attacks and ad-hominem assaults.