31 Reasons To Reject The Jab

way 2 go

Well-known member

.https://x.com/redpilldispensr/status/1972218233433296939

 
Last edited:

way 2 go

Well-known member

Nick M

Reconciled by the Cross
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
The creator of Dilbert Scott Adams developed cancer after taking the jab. His vaccine repentance video was up on youtube. It might still be. He is terminal.
 

Avajs

Active member
I suspect he also developed cancer after he was born.
Wow, hard to beat that logic, but misses the point---can you show a causal relationship between a vaccine, breakfast, being born and cancer? And to follow up on the Dilbert creator, last I read he may not be terminal (although to follow the thought process of Right Divider, we are all terminal). His prostate cancer may respond to hormone therapy. If so, good for him, and another win for science--just as vaccine's are another win for science. For a good summary of the advances in science leading to better cancer therapies read The Emperor of All Maladies.
 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
Wow, hard to beat that logic, but misses the point---can you show a causal relationship between a vaccine, breakfast, being born and cancer? And to follow up on the Dilbert creator, last I read he may not be terminal (although to follow the thought process of Right Divider, we are all terminal). His prostate cancer may respond to hormone therapy. If so, good for him, and another win for science--just as vaccine's are another win for science. For a good summary of the advances in science leading to better cancer therapies read The Emperor of All Maladies.

According to a nee_tweet he posted a month or two ago, it will only work for a year or two. It buys him time, but it's not a cure.
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Here's a science-based counter to the questionable source at X:


Good thing I posted more than one, then.

Here's another, for good measure:

 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass

He's reiterating what we knew in 2022!

12 November 2022

Conclusions​

The benefits of vaccination over non-vaccination in terms of prevented hospitalizations and serious COVID-19 complications remain undisputable. In the age group, most at risk of vaccine myocarditis (12–29 years), for every 100 000 vaccinated, compared to about four more cases of myocarditis we have 56 fewer hospitalizations, 13.8 fewer admissions to intensive care and 0.6 fewer deaths.16 We must not forget to compare different groups of subjects (vaccinated against unvaccinated, COVID against non-COVID) before drawing conclusions on the possible association between COVID vaccination and myocarditis. The rate of myocarditis in non-COVID and unvaccinated subjects is not zero, but is approximately 0.33 cases per million per day (98 cases per 296 377 727 person-days), compared with 0.78 cases per million for day in vaccinated subjects (117 cases per 149 786 065 person-days).11,12 This equates to a 2.35-fold increase in the risk of myocarditis in association with vaccination (Rate Ratio 2.45 (1.10–5, 02)), but with a rate of myocarditis in the comparison group (unvaccinated) not equal to zero. According to the ‘Centre for Disease Control’, an excess of observed cases, compared with those predicted on the basis of the historical trend of myocarditis (unvaccinated subjects), is observed only up to the age of 29 in females, and 49 years in the male sex (https://cdc.gov/vaccines). To simplify the concept, it is not certain that the finding of a myocarditis in a subject affected by COVID, or that he has just been vaccinated, represents the sure demonstration that myocarditis is caused by COVID or vaccination. These figures bring to mind a famous cartoon of two British statisticians meeting: One asks the other: ‘How do you do?’ And the other replies without delay: ‘Compared to whom?’.
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
He's reiterating what we knew in 2022!

12 November 2022

Conclusions​

The benefits of vaccination over non-vaccination in terms of prevented hospitalizations and serious COVID-19 complications remain undisputable. In the age group, most at risk of vaccine myocarditis (12–29 years), for every 100 000 vaccinated, compared to about four more cases of myocarditis we have 56 fewer hospitalizations, 13.8 fewer admissions to intensive care and 0.6 fewer deaths.16 We must not forget to compare different groups of subjects (vaccinated against unvaccinated, COVID against non-COVID) before drawing conclusions on the possible association between COVID vaccination and myocarditis. The rate of myocarditis in non-COVID and unvaccinated subjects is not zero, but is approximately 0.33 cases per million per day (98 cases per 296 377 727 person-days), compared with 0.78 cases per million for day in vaccinated subjects (117 cases per 149 786 065 person-days).11,12 This equates to a 2.35-fold increase in the risk of myocarditis in association with vaccination (Rate Ratio 2.45 (1.10–5, 02)), but with a rate of myocarditis in the comparison group (unvaccinated) not equal to zero. According to the ‘Centre for Disease Control’, an excess of observed cases, compared with those predicted on the basis of the historical trend of myocarditis (unvaccinated subjects), is observed only up to the age of 29 in females, and 49 years in the male sex (https://cdc.gov/vaccines). To simplify the concept, it is not certain that the finding of a myocarditis in a subject affected by COVID, or that he has just been vaccinated, represents the sure demonstration that myocarditis is caused by COVID or vaccination. These figures bring to mind a famous cartoon of two British statisticians meeting: One asks the other: ‘How do you do?’ And the other replies without delay: ‘Compared to whom?’.
So, maybe I'm just tired, but for whatever reason, I couldn't follow what was being said in that final paragraph. I had GPT break it down in simpler language...

Here’s what the passage is really saying, in plain language:

  • Vaccines clearly prevent serious COVID outcomes. For young people (ages 12–29), even though vaccination slightly increases the risk of myocarditis (heart inflammation), the benefits are much larger: for every 100,000 vaccinated, there are about 4 extra cases of myocarditis, but 56 fewer hospitalizations, 14 fewer ICU stays, and about 1 fewer death from COVID.
  • Myocarditis is not unique to vaccination. Even in unvaccinated people with no COVID, it occurs at a low rate—about 0.33 cases per million people per day. In vaccinated people, it’s about 0.78 per million per day. That works out to roughly 2.3 times higher risk in the vaccinated group, but again, not a zero baseline.
  • According to CDC data, this higher risk is only clearly seen in younger people—up to age 29 in women, and up to age 49 in men.
  • The key point: finding a case of myocarditis after vaccination (or after COVID infection) does not automatically mean the vaccine (or the virus) caused it. You always need to compare groups to see whether the rate is higher than normal.
  • The “statisticians joke” at the end (“Compared to whom?”) is just a reminder that numbers only make sense when you know what group you’re comparing them against.
 
Last edited:

Ps82

Well-known member
I didn't want to in the beginning and I didn't for a long while. Until my friend's young healthy son-in-law died suddenly of what they said was COVID, then I took the first two jabs ... but stopped.

I'm still glad I stopped. I haven't even taken the flu shots since entering college. So far so good.
 

Nick M

Reconciled by the Cross
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Nicotine is a nutrient found in night shade vegetables. It isn't an added chemical. Tomatoes, peppers that stuff. And Potatoes. Why is there no nicotine warning on a bag of chips? Our bodies have nicotine receptors. This next piece is a double hit. Long covid is of course with people have been vaccinated and multiple boosters. It is a vaccine injury. And people did notice smokers didn't get covid.

Statistical surveys of COVID-19 patients indicate, against all common logic, that people who smoke are less prone to the infection and/or exhibit less severe respiratory symptoms than non-smokers.

....statistical surveys of COVID-19 positive patients in France and China suggest that the people who smoke are more often asymptomatic or exhibit less severe respiratory symptoms than the non-smokers who often develop an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [2]. These observations seem to contradict common sense because the impaired function of lungs (for example various degrees of emphysema) in smokers [3] should make them more, not less, vulnerable to the respiratory consequences of the virus attack.

In no way am I telling you that inhaling smoke particulates is healthy. Of course it isn't. And some people just can't get rid of covid, and it isn't a vaccine injury. Their diet is trash (American recommended) and their immune system does not work. There is very little nicotine in a cigarette. Don't use that method. Use the patch or gum. Or start eating peppers.
 
Six attempts, four of them called "vaccine", one as a pill, and finally a kind of "energy buster" to combat COVID.

In science, three or more attempts in a year is not called a vaccine but is called "experimenting". Six attempts in less than two years, surely the whole fuss was just an experiment in progress.

Lets go further.

My doctor, my dear doctor, frequently asking me to have the COVID test, just the test, just in case. I have no idea why but finally I conceded and I had the test. The results came POSITIVE. Instructions to be at home for ten days even if I feel OK. And yes, I had not a single symptom when the results arrived saying I had the virus. But this is not all.

After certain time, I received not the bill but the cost of the test. The total was $200. It came from the lab that analyzed the sample. So, the vaccine was not "free" as told by President Biden. And I remember at Walgreen a woman asking for six of those tests and she say her family have those test every week. If the test alone costs $200, then how much was each vaccine?

Let's follow the dots. Tests and vaccines weren't free. Someone paid for them: the government. Taxpayers' money went to lab companies and pharmacies (doctors and scientists included). Millions and millions of dollars paid for tests and vaccines that in the majority of cases were not needed but became "mandatory" in several places.

I myself said, "hell no, I won't let this happen to me, a doctor who introduces products he doesn't know into a body he knows even less."

I remember when the virus appeared, probable October or November, the reaction in my body was diarrhea, almost unnoticeable headache, and that was all. And I'm in the category of major risk because my age. But I felt good in that moment, and I still feel healthy enough today, so I rejected the vaccine all the time. I understand that people with health issues were the ones going to emergency and died. Smokers was other category with high risk because smoke covers the lung's membrane and COVID was doing exactly the same, so it was an increment of risk. Athletes were another category in risk because their "good health" sometimes is fake, this is to say, they take too many additives, legal drugs and similar to stay in excellent shape, but their body decays internally because such abuse of supplements.

The masks were the real solution to stop the spreading of the virus. A year after the first wave of COVID, it was discovered that masks not only helped to slow the spreading of COVID, but the cases of Flu also diminished. Masks were enough to combat COVID. And here is what I understood by studying the corollary of this story without political or propagandistic influence.

Let's say you got the virus and you get sick. Inside your body, your immune system is in war with the virus. Your body is injured but the virus is also injured. Even when the virus was slighted hurt, when the virus left your body to pass to another body, the body of the other person also stars another war with the virus and also causes some damage to it. And so forth, each time the virus passes from one person to another, war after war the virus eventually becomes weaker.

This is why, thanks to the continued war between our bodies against the virus, actually the COVID, the original one from years ago, has ended like a common cold. This is not thanks to vaccines but thanks to our bodies. Of course, some people were injured bad, but they fought "the good war". We have survivors and heroes, the COVID of years ago is not as dangerous as before. There are viruses and bacteria that we can't fight properly because they are like modern missiles and our bodies appear to fight with slingshots. Here is when we need help. But, when the COVID 19 appeared, I didn't see people coming outside bleeding from noise and ears, falling down on streets with twisted tongue and bulging eyes. So, I said, "killer virus? naahhh, this virus only kills the weaker not the healthier". And I continued my life like nothing is happening.
 

Avajs

Active member
Well, good for you. But I don’t think when you infect someone else you provide weaker virus. If anything, the virus that survives your immune system may have done so because it mutated to become different if not stronger.
 
Top